Teoria mea despre cauzele parafiliei (homosexualităţii)

Teoria mea despre cauzele parafiliei (homosexualităţii)

psihopatologie Baldovin   10:41

Acest vlog este un rezumat al unei deducţii structuralist-genealogice asupra cauzelor homosexualităţii pe care am detaliat-o în cartea mea „Dinamica psihologiei abisale” . Am făcut un prim video ceva mai tehnic în limba engleză aici https://youtu.be/jDrkB8OW7aI , şi cel de faţă mai simplu, în română. Ambele au subtitrări încastrate în video, însă platformele Rumble, Facebook sau YouTube, au subtitrări separate, ce pot fi convertite în alte limbi. Primul video poate fi văzut în :

rumble



facebook



youtube



tiktok

instgrm

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Baldovin psi (@baldovinpsi)

archive.org



Cel de-al doilea video poate fi văzut în :

rumble



facebook



Youtube

instagram

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Baldovin psi (@baldovinpsi)

Mai jos puteţi vedea şi varianta de text simplu pentru primul video, tradus în română din engleză (mai jos şi varianta originală:

„Vă salut! Acesta va fi un vlog în engleză, aşa că, dacă nu înţelegeţi pronunţia mea, Voi pune subtitrări separate în Rumble, Facebook sau YouTube. Căutaţi aceeaşi titlu pe profilul „Baldovin psi”, şi îl puteţi vedea cu traducere în engleză sau tradus automat în toate limbile de pe glob! Îl fac în engleză pentru că vizează o problemă de interes larg; teoria mea despre homosexualitate de fapt este o teorie nouă, dar pe care am dezvoltat-o în urmă cu ceva timp în cartea mea „Dinamica psihologiei abisale”, încă netradusă în engleză, dar Google face cât de cât treaba asta. Cum o explic? O explic printr-o caracteristică specială a homosexualităţii pe care toată lumea a observat-o încă din antichitate, şi anume faptul că persoanele homosexuale sau bisexuale sunt atrase de acelaşi sex. De fapt ele dezvoltă comportamentul sexual opus şi explic asta prin dezvoltarea transgeneraţională a libidoului, a impulsurilor sexuale în creierul nostru. De fapt, avem impulsuri genitale provenind de la organul nostru instinctual, biologic, şi avem impulsuri moştenite din linia noastră matrilineară sau patrinală.

Deci, de fapt, cu toţii avem o anumită parte de comportament homosexual; nouă, bărbaţilor, uneori ne place când partenerele noastre se comportă în pat ca un bărbat, chiar dacă nu am accepta un act sexual homosexual cu o persoană de acelaşi sex ca noi. Deci există grade de homosexualitate, provenind de la gradul mai mic până la cel mai înalt, al homosexualităţii absolute, pentru că există şi persoane care sunt atrase de ambele sexe; şi ele sînt bisexuale. Şi, la cealaltă extremă avem persoanele absolut normale, care se identifică natural fie cu un sex, fie cu celălalt, concordant. Dar între aceste extreme există grade diferite începând de la homosexualitatea exclusivă, apoi ajungând la bisexualitate, apoi transsexualitate, în care, în opinia mea, intră acele persoane cărora nu le place să fie homosexuale, au o discordanţă, o discordanţă mentală cu tendinţele lor. Şi ei îşi explică inconştient această tendinţă prin faptul că sunt cumva plasaţi într-un corp greşit. Şi apoi urmează travestismul fetişist; care este un fel special de fetişism ce există la bărbaţi; lor le plac femeile, dar sunt excitaţi sexual dacă se îmbracă cu lenjerie intimă feminină. Uneori le spun partenerelor lor despre asta, alteori nu. Dar asta e ceea ce îi excită, sexual. Şi apoi există un alt grad spre normalitate, care este metatropia (metatropismul) – aşa se numea în mai multe cărţi pe care le-am citit acum ceva timp – care este o atracţie heterosexuală între un bărbat foarte feminin şi o femeie foarte masculină. Şi, de fapt, aşa ceva este o relaţie pe jumătate homosexuală; ei sînt făcuţi unul pentru celălalt şi înţeleg că partenerul lor este cel mai bun partener, pentru fiecare, pentru că le place aşa cum interacţionează în pat; femeia iniţiază activitatea sexuală, iar bărbatul este foarte pasiv în acest caz. Şi acesta este, aşa cum am spus, un prim pas spre homosexualitate.

Deci, cum o explic? O explic din perspectiva transgeneraţională; Adică există o contribuţie matrilineară şi una patrineală sexuală în libidoul nostru general, individual. Şi dacă linia genealogică de acelaşi sex este scăzută, atunci vom dezvolta atracţia faţă de sexul opus, deoarece linia genealogică sexual opusă a părinţilor, bunicilor şi străbunicilor noştri, depăşesc, este mai puternică decât impulsul nostru genital împreună libidoul nostru concordant moştenit de la părinţii, bunicii noştri şi aşa mai departe. Deci, în acest caz avem două posibilităţi: în primul rând, homosexualitatea absolută – cred că provine dintr-o linie genetică de pe aceeaşi linie sexuală în care există o „tulburare de personalitate de tip schizoid” sau o tulburare depresivă puternică. Şi în cazul tulburărilor schizoide sau depresive există o atracţie foarte, foarte scăzută, un interes foarte, foarte scăzut pentru sex, dragoste şi ură; persoanelor cu tulburare schizoidă nu le pasă dacă sînt criticate sau dacă sunt iubite. Pur şi simplu, nu le pasă, nu sunt interesaţi. Uneori, se căsătoresc pentru că anturajul, părinţii, prietenii le-o cer, Şi, în acest caz, copilul de acelaşi sex cu ei va dezvolta o tendinţă homosexuală.

Şi în celălalt caz, al tulburării depresive, de asemenea, libidoul este foarte scăzut. Şi, pe de altă parte, avem un posibil hiperapetit sexual pe linia opusă, adică de la părinte, bunic/ă sau străbunic/ă. Şi o astfel de combinaţie este posibil să derive în bisexualitate; Adică, linia sexului opus este foarte puternică, în negocierea libidoului general al individului, are un foarte puternic impact în el. Şi de aceea oamenii vor dezvolta tendinţe homosexuale. Aşadar, aceasta este teoria mea! Mulţumesc pentru vizionare! O zi bună!”

Mai jos puteţi citi varianta de text simplu a celui de-al doilea video:

„Bună ziua! În precedentul video am dat o explicaţie aşa un pic mai tehnică despre teoria mea asupra cauzei parafiliei, adică atracţiei pentru acelaşi sex, care şi ea până la urmă era o simplificare a teoriei mele, pe care am expus-o mult mai detaliat în cartea mea „Dinamica psihologiei abisale”. Ei bine, în videoul ăsta o să fac o simplificare, să zic aşa, maximă a teoriei mele. Respectiv, avem bisexualitate în cazul în care pe linia transgeneraţională de sex opus avem un hiperapetit libidinal; asta duce la bisexualitate. Pe de altă parte, dacă pe linia transgeneraţională de acelaşi sex avem aplatizare libidinală, răspunsul, rezultatul va fi fie parafilie totală, homosexualitate, fie transexualitate, care e o homosexualitate din asta mascată, sub teoria schimbării corpului genital, organului genital.

Şi există trei situaţii de aplatizare libidinală. Eu am zis în videoul precedent doar două, respectiv tulburarea de personalitate de tip schizoid şi o depresie mijlocie spre majoră. Astea au constantă lipsa apetitului sexual. Ei bine, şi mai e o situaţie, cu care am început eu la un moment dat seria asta de videouri, respectiv maternitatea la femei: în timpul maternităţii apetitul sexual femeiesc scade la maxim. Numai bine, cu ocazia asta, să vă readuc aminte, în special pentru domni, să nu facă presiuni asupra soţiilor aflate în perioada maternităţii să aibă relaţii intime. Pentru că dacă rămân însărcinate în urma unei astfel de relaţii intime, atunci fetiţa e posibil să dezvolte un comportament lesbian în viitor; pentru că libidoul ei vine mare parte de la tatăl hiper libidinal, iar de la mamă, care are în cazul de faţă maternitate, să nu primească nimic în negocierea generală a libidoului. Desigur, că nu-i vorba doar de mamă aici. E vorba şi de bunică, e vorba şi de străbunică. Şi aici mai e de căutat să vedem cam care e situaţia de uneori străbunica, alteori bunica, sau alteori mama are un cuvânt de spus în treaba asta.

Şi, desigur, se deschide aici pentru mine posibilitatea de a face un tabel al compatibilităţii libidinale între membrii cuplului, adică pe viitor să facem cumva să ne alegem partenerul în funcţie de apetitul nostru libidinal şi nu de alte lucruri, de, eu ştiu… modul cum ne potrivim în exterior, după statutul social fiecăruia. Nu. E mult mai important să fie un oarecare echilibru între apetitul sexual între partenerii cuplului, deşi într-adevăr, libidoul bărbatului trebuie să fie un pic mai puternic, că aşa e natural datorită funcţiei masculinităţii. Desigur, tabelul respectiv nu pot să-l fac acum că am altceva de făcut, dar în câţiva ani cred că o să fac asta, dacă tot o să fie bine pentru mine. O zi faină vă doresc! La revedere!”

Textul original în limba engleză al primului video este următorul:

„Hello! This is going to be an English vlog, so if you don't understand my pronunciation, I will put separate captions in Rumble, Facebook or YouTube. Go and search for the same name on “Baldovin psi” profile and you can see it with English translation or automatically translated into all kind of languages on this planet! I'm making it in English because it's a wide interest issue; my theory on homosexuality is a new theory actually, but that I developed some time ago in my book “The dynamics of abyssal psychology” also not translated it in English, but Google will do the job. How do I explain that? I explain it by a special feature in homosexuality that everybody noticed it even from the antiquity, namely the fact that the homosexual or bisexual persons are attracted to the same sex. Actually they develop the opposite sexual behavior and I explain it towards transgenerational development of the libido, of the sexual impulses in our brain. Actually we have genital impulses coming from our biological organ, instinct, and we have impulses inherited from our matrilineal or patrineal inherited lineage.

So, actually, all of us have a certain part of homosexual behavior; we, the men, we sometimes like when our partners behave like a man, even if we wouldn't engage in a homosexual intercourse with the same sex person as us. So there are degrees of homosexuality, coming from the smaller degree to the higher one, of exclusive homosexuality, ‘cause there are also persons that are attracted to both sexes; and they are bisexual persons. And in the other extreme we have the absolute normal persons that like to behave either in one sex or other. But between these extremes there are different degrees coming from exclusive homosexuality, bisexuality and we have transexuality, which, in my opinion, are those persons that don't like to be homosexuals, they have a discordance, a mental discordance with their tendencies. And they unconsciously explain that tendency by the fact that they're somehow misplaced in a wrong body. And we have also the fetishist travestism; it's a kind a special type of fetishism that is involved in men; they like women, but they are sexually attracted to wear women underwear. Sometimes they tell their partners, sometime they don't. But this is what brings them on, sexually. And there is another step towards normality, which is metatropy – it was called like that in several books that I read some time ago – which is a heterosexual attraction between a very feminine man and a very masculine woman. And actually this is a half homosexuality; they are built one for another and they understand that their partners is the best partner for them, because they like each other the way they interact in bed; the woman starts the sexual activity and the man is very passive in this case, you know. And this is, like I said before, a step towards homosexuality.

So how do I explain it? I explain it from the transgenerational perspective; I mean there's a matrilineal and a patrineal sexual contribution to our general libido. And if the same sex lineage is low, then we will develop the opposite sex attraction, because the opposite lineage of our parents, grandparents and grand-grandparents overwhelms, is more powerful than our genital impulse is and our (concordant) libido inherited from our parents, grandparents and so on. So, in this case we have two possibilities: first of all, the absolute homosexuality – I believe that comes from a lineage on the same sex lineage that suffers from “Schizoid personality disorder” or a powerful depressive disorder. And in this case, in case of schizoid or depressive disorders, you have a very very low attraction, very very low interest in sex and love and hate also; the people with schizoid disorder don't care if are criticized or if they are loved. They also don't care, they aren't interested. Sometimes, they marry because the entourage, the parents, the friends ask them to. And, in this case, the same sex child will develop a homosexual tendency.

And in the other case, with depressive disorder, also the libido is very low. And, on the other hand, we have a possible hyper-appetite sexuality on the opposite lineage, I mean the parent, grandparent, and grand-grandparent. And in this case it's possible to have a bisexuality; I mean the opposite sex lineage is very powerful that, in the negotiation of the general libido of the individual, they have a very strong point. And that's why people will develop homosexual tendencies. So this is my theory! Thanks for watching! Have a nice day!”

Gabriel Baldovin

2.5.3. The capitalist methods of persuasion

2.5.3. The capitalist methods of persuasion

sociologie Baldovin   13:38

The automatist society manifesto  

 

2.5. The evolution of methods of persuading servants to execute orders

This article continues the previous one

Click aici pentru varianta în limba română

2.5.3. The capitalist methods of persuasion

The slaves riot and their retreat into (religious) prayer are the main social reactions that led to the suspension or improvement of classical slavery. The feudal lord practice of collecting taxes from the "free peasants", who lived on his lands, was a very clever strategy of the feudal system to diversify and improve Greek-Roman slavery. Instead of terrorizing the order taker with direct threats to more efficient work, the feudal lord gave him freedom of choice. Here is the pragmatic core of the Christianity free will theory. This abstract theory has had a very pragmatic application. The peasant who worked more or less efficiently, however, could keep a larger share of the goods produced, after another share was paid as taxes to the feudal lord, and thus his wealth was bigger. The one who produced less, remained with lesser, and was poorer. Unlike the classical slavery threats to produce more, the feudalism used another profit strategy: it encouraged extra work, but not forced it, so the servant had a certain illusion of freedom. Although the feudalism and capitalism are seen as completely different systems, we can still see in the first one the capitalism itself very roots.

Although the early Christianity preached the values of poverty, money and wealth gradually began to become fundamental values of its later variants, such as the Catholicism and, later, the Protestantism. This change of direction was directly recognized, either at the colloquial level, or at the scientific level by the famous sociologist Max Weber, especially through his book "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism". That is why the American "Christians" of the 18th or 19th century, especially the Protestants, had no problem restoring the classical slavery, despite all the criticism leveled at it by Jesus and the Church Fathers. Recently, even the Orthodoxy has turned on the money values, although there are still important figures here who disavow the culture of profit.

But the capitalism actually has its origins in the Christianity free will theory. This allowed the free peasant's freedom to work more or less, or not to work at all, and to live in poverty, praying, unlike the classical slavery, which did not tolerate disobedience and inactivity. The difference between feudalism and capitalism is that the last one specific job is much more restricted than that of the former. The territory of the owner's factory is much smaller than the feudal land. Both the capitalist owner and the feudal lord claim ownership of that production space. The difference between the two is that the feudal lord claims ownership of the (processing) natural resources and less of the production tools, while the businessman owns only the production tools and not the natural resources that the factory processes.

Subsequently, through lobbies or various schemes, the big industrialists bought the natural resources, or transferred them from a certain authority. But initially they bought the raw products, which they later processed in their factories. The production space restriction looked like certain equalization between the master and the subject, which seduced the feudal peasant. The feudal domination of huge tracts of land in the name of a false "divine right" no longer seemed credible to many medieval subjects. Because the industrial business owner did not use the feudal theory of "divine right" that the feudal lord claimed, he seemed more just. That is why many peasants thus preferred to leave the feudal lands, risking a nomadic life until they were employed in the factories of the industrialists. Having a closer way of life to theirs, the industrialist boss seemed more humane than the feudal lord, secluded in his castle and isolated from the community. But in fact, over time, the capitalism has created the most radical social segregation, and the wealth of the industrialists has led to a chasm between masters and subjects as never seen before in history.

The medieval peasants, who turned into factory workers, were lured with welfare but gradually lost their freedom. This is the capitalism principle, which he is not shy to express (although the last part is a big lie): "you work hard and live well." This predisposition to social ascension has materialized in the twentieth century in the "American Dream" mentality, according to which, if you are a hard worker and have no dissident activity, the system will reward people, and will get rich. Such a statement is true, according to the previous centuries wealth criteria, as it was similar to food and clothing, plus housing-specific commodities such as toilets connected to hot water and sewers. However, if in exchange for these comforts you lose the right to socialize or walk in the natural space, due to lack of time, then the wealth exists only at the surface. But if increasing living standards or access to technology leads to a decrease in fundamental personal freedoms, then such a practice is unfair. It contradicts the very principle of the increasing freedoms that the technological evolution and, implicitly, of the human being standard of living, must bring.

The Christianity brought the liberation to the slaves from the yard of the Greek-Roman aristocrats, but somehow under the influence of the compulsion to repeat , they returned to the new masters’ yard, the capitalist industrialists. In a way it can be said that the liberation was not real even during feudalism, because the slavery virus followed them, as in a pandemic, by the master property extending to the places where they settled. But the fact that "Caesar" was far away most of the time, in addition to the Christian ideology of hope, gave them the illusion that they were free. On the contrary, the capitalists rebuilt this slavery, preserving the illusion of medieval freedom. The different rest space from the work place, and the avoidance of corporal punishment after disobedience, were realities that gave the work relationship a freely agreed the aspect of freedom, and not classical slavery. In fact, this difference is more apparent, as I have shown in this section . But the difference between these profit extraction systems exists in fact; the industrialists were happy if any worker resigned, unlike the Greek-Roman master or feudal aristocrat. Unemployed people were waiting at the factory gate to get hired, initially voluntarily leaving the feudal lands, and then out of necessity, after they had gone bankrupt or converted themselves into industrialists.

Apart from these, there is the modern order takers superior training to handle the capitalist technology , , which was done by a new-liberal mentality, but not with a conservative-fatalistic one , specific to the classic slave. The ostentatious morality simulation, which I described in the previous section, was a real PR strategy by which the new masters wanted to win the public sympathy, promising that they would be good and merciful to the potential subjects. The bourgeois experience has confirmed that the wage-earner is far more profitable with his enthusiasm at work, pursuing his "American Dream", than the fatalist classical slave, who resignedly accepts his destiny. The industrial economy operates with the enthusiasm of its subjects. The modern order taker needs more liberties than those offered by the feudal era, in order to regain its enthusiasm, after being squeezed out of strength during the work schedule.

The experience of medieval freedoms given to the classical slave has been preserved in the industrial age until the contemporary period. Thus, the system no longer puts those brutal pressures on it as in the past, such as the direct threat of death or beating. Instead of these, the capitalism created a disinformation bubble around the potential servant, a kind of Matrix. Through this disinformational mechanism the common people are drawn into this dirty game of giving up its own freedom in favor of obedience, recruitment and taking orders in a hierarchy of command. The ads are mostly false, das I have shown in this article .

The paradox is that the advertisements mythomaniac-disinformation function is preserved even when they tell the truth. The almost obsessive repetition of a product benefits becomes a lie precisely because it prevents the human being from thinking about his own metaphysical and religious condition, and even from resting, in the most mercantile sense of the word. The ads harass the individual's emotional peace and psychodynamic balance . This misinformation influx leads to all kinds of needs increasing, especially the sexual and food ones, which involves over-consumption and wasting. The fairy-tales about ecology and stopping global warming told by the demagogues are part of the same disinformation bubble, in the context in which the whole capitalist system operates on over-consumption, waste, and constant abuse of the environment.

Observing this common people predisposition to "treat" its psychological pain with greed, the modern society has developed over time a megasystem of artificial lust creation. Theadvertising has exactly this role in deep sublimating in the "target" the fact that she/he is living a boring, uninteresting and despicable life, and that this could change if buys different products. Here we see a subliminal attack on human freedom, which makes the free trade appearance an abusive subordination.

The artificial creation of human desires, as the consumerism advertising does, practically manipulates the value of demand from the famous economic law of supply and demand. Such a practice destroys any idea of a free market. The purpose of stimulating these artificial cravings, by issuing specific advertising messages, is done precisely to bring it into a seemingly free labor-wage exchange relationship, which I have detailed in this section .

With the industrial age, the illusions have become much more real, more pragmatic, linked to an immediate reality that produces some satisfaction, even if only a passing one. The medieval daydreaming of a happy life in the afterlife has been replaced by the capitalist daydreaming of a happy life in the real world, just as social privileges themselves had. The new executor wanted this illusion to have a greater factual correspondence with reality. The exaggeration of this satisfaction, its oversizing to the stage of nirvana, of mercantile heaven, is the main feature of this new economic exchange between the slave and the master. It does seem fair, but, as I have shown in the section linked above, it does not differ in principle from that of the classical slavery.

But these concrete illusions still remain illusions, as were those of Christian rhetoric feudalism. The entertainment industry is a lucrative industry designed to artificially create optimism in the tired and depressed soul of the modern order taker. Like Plato's Cave myth, the capitalism creates a cave of blind enthusiasm, a manic happiness fueled by "happy ending" Hollywood movies, and psychoactive substances.

Baiting with a high lifestyle and belonging to the social elite is a strategy made both at the macrosocial level, by manipulating the money supply circulating on the market , as well as at the microsocial level, through the corporations strategies for recruiting and modeling the employee's behavior. This is done in two steps, respectively:

1. uprooting the employee from the current lifestyle;
2. the progressive reduction of individual freedoms, already given and lived as rights guaranteed in the previous lifestyle.

This thing is done through a perverse luring strategy, almost identical to the fishing pond luring. Initially, for a short period of time, the system/company offers higher wages than the ratio between the work activity efficiency and the labor market. Then, either the wages gradually decrease or the volume of work increases in such a way that the exchange no longer reflects the balance between the current remuneration market value and the work performed, as described above. Once the employee gets used to a certain high lifestyle, it becomes dependent on the hierarchical system, and, statistically, can no longer resign. There are some who do it, however, but most of them accept this status, as evidenced by these statistics. It will be difficult for most of them to return to their previous lifestyle and will accept the new conditions of the employer, although initially they would not have accepted them.

The capitalism has prepared some small gifts of indulgence, which have increased since then, such as the free weekends. Then it offered the paid days-off of the legal holidays and the seasonal vacation. Finally, as an extreme solution, there was the unpaid dismissal introduced for those who have the political leaders profile, in order to avoid starting a possible uprising in the workplace that might attract others into it. From this point of view, the wage slavery is radically different from classical slavery; the submission refusal led to punishment both for the one who adopted it as for the other slaves; on the contrary, the same thing leads to dismissal in capitalism and the dissidents exclusion from the group of other subjects, so as not to induce them revolt ideas.

These measures have a very precise purpose: they are meant to make the most of the obedient man and to offer it a period of rest when is tired, and to be let go when is about to erupt in revolt, before taking revenge on someone close to the circle of masters. Despite its cynicism, that has remained the same as in antiquity, it is a remarkable evolution of slavery. We must fully admit this! The work termination allows other naïve enthusiasts to be extracted the profit from, without causing other traumas to the disappointed one, as the classic slavery done to the unproductive slaves, through corporal punishment or even death. In over 3,000 years of classical slavery, the masters have learned that the slave revenge through rebellion is unprofitable for all.

In the next section I will describe the misinformation, as a manipulation bubble in which the order taker is a prisoner.

Gabriel Baldovin

2. 5. 2. The morality as a reaction to the slave riot

2. 5. 2. The morality as a reaction to the slave riot

sociologie Baldovin   03:11

The automatist society manifesto  

 

2.5. The evolution of methods of persuading servants to execute orders

This article continues the previous one

Click aici pentru varianta in limba romana

2. 5. 2. The morality as a reaction to the slave riot

(I return to the series of articles dedicated to the modern modification of slavery, after the series dedicated to feminism)

The second cause for the classical slavery abolition was derived from the slaves’ reaction on their masters, namely the morality. The basis of morality has been differently located by different theorists, but it can be reduced to a behavior guided by the principle "do as you would be done by!". The slave riots endangered their masters’ lives, even though they later organized and defeated them. But defending the slaves’ revolts does not mean solving the problem. Dead slaves can no longer be exploited, and the survivors no longer want to serve. The Roman Empire victories over the slave rots led to its final collapse, as attacked both from the outside, by the conquered people’s revenge, but also from the inside, by the slaves’ riot. The superior liberties granting to the classical slaves, by the feudalism and then by the capitalism, led to the slaves’ revolt tempering and to the master himself bigger security of his own life.

There is a morality root learned by everyone in the family: if a family member uses unequally the family resources, in its favor and against the others, he will receive their disapproval; when a child does not share with its brother/sister what he has, he will suffer the parents’ disapproval or punishment. At the social level, the same thing happens, but the disapproval/punishment does not come from the parents, but from the other society members, frustrated by the rich ones too big privileges. Kant's "categorical imperative" is, in fact, a diversification and superior development of this early experience. He formulated it in two ways. The first one was: " Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the same time as an end!" The second one was: "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law!"

Of course, as we already know, the slavery is deeply contradicts these principles. In the ancient times the classical slave was a person "who deserved to be killed, but for various reasons was allowed to live." Reducing the human status to an intermediate stage between man and animal, rather to the latter, has been a solution to reconciling profitable socio-economic practices with this immutable ethical principle.

Similarly, the modern wage slave can be thrown into not-being as an useless tool, after not being profitable enough. Obtaining access to medical services after losing a job, through the bureaucracy of losing health insurance, is a capitalism practice that identically reflects the way in which the classical slavery evaluated the slave. (On this basis, the furious free vaccination campaign against SARS-VOC2 seems more like a trap or a political advertising campaign than a medical honest practice). So, the status of the slave is no longer shown "as an end ", as Kant states.

The other categorical imperative formulation does not support slavery either. As most moralists have already stated, the slavery cannot be in harmony with morality, because the master cannot place all of humanity in the person of the slave or does not agree to be treated like his slave. To kill a human being, or to reduce his creative potential, can never become a universal law, because that would mean the extinction of the human species. In fact, the morality itself as a discipline was created by prominent figures in philosophy and religion precisely to counteract this scourge of civilization. Among the first morality manifestations in the civilization history there is the restriction "Do not kill!". This moral low is one of a group of ten "commandments" from the Old Book known as the "Old Testament." It is the basis for both Christianity and Judaism or Islam. If we look at the classical slavery ideological engine, expressed by the equivalence stated above, then we see that the slavery cannot exist without death. The beating, with which the slaves were sometimes frightened to work more efficient, is a slower death. Another such "commandment", in this group of 10, is "Do not steal!" It prevents the robbery specific to classical society, which is the main source of slavery.

Therefore, we can say not only that the slavery is immoral, but that the morality itself is dedicated to countering the slavery. I will return to this topic in one of the next articles. This moral perception is felt by everyone more or less clearly in his inner moral court. Any man educated in a civilized culture, and without interest in the comfort given by the slavery, will disavow it. And that is why it was disguised in today's waged form. Because, unfortunately, the slavery is the main engine of any pre-automatic economy, as it is still in our society.

So, morally, the slavery is not sustainable by the increasing personal freedom argument, as long as it is materialized by the mental / spiritual mutilation of others. The slavery thus turns out to be rather a set of abusive liberties, which the master takes from his slaves, violating their essential freedoms. That is why the Aristotle's famous argument for justifying slavery, by increasing and maintaining the master superior freedoms, is demolished precisely by this reality of attacking other people's freedoms.

This creates in the human mind a strange ambivalence between the moral law and the slave exploitation convenience preservation. An example is Aristotle himself, who freed his slaves at the end of his life, instead of giving them to a loved one. From this decision we can see that he himself only partially believed in that argument, that is, under the profit that results from this practice. But in fact, his moral side rejected him. If he had not rejected him, then the Stagirite would have left those slaves to someone, in order to do a "good". Kant said that this conflict between the convenience of profit due to self-interest and the moral law must not exist. But, of course, such an attitude is part of his rigid spirit that repressed the passion and promoted the reason. However, Freud found it camouflaged among the many mental conflicts, specific to various disorders, even though he did not recognize it literally, and preferred to recognize it in the conflict between sexuality and social norms.

However, even though the slavery was felt as immoral by civilization, its usefulness prevailed. Despite the Christianity moral pressures, as the figures of history show, the classical slavery has continued until recently. Indeed, it was largely replaced by the feudal system, which, as I mentioned, was an easier form of slavery, with the slave being given the freedom to leave or remain on the feudal estate. However, we know very well that the classical slavery was adopted by the very Christianity in America until the American Civil War. Not only Catholicism and (especially) Protestantism have practiced it. The Orthodox Church has also practiced it, even if not very often, over the centuries.

The conflict between the slavery usefulness and its prohibition given by the morality was balanced by the growing flexibility of the social system. In ancient times, the classical slavery system was much more rigid; the refusal to serve was punished by death. Later, in feudalism, its refusal only led to cutting off access to natural resources, an austere life. The capitalism came up with another invention, namely blaming any kind of traditional lifestyle and then artificially creating false needs, promoted by the advertising techniques that the system subliminally plants in the potential subject mentality. Satisfying these needs in exchange for the taking orders gives the slavery an appearance of free trade, as I showed in the previous chapter .

In this case, we notice that inside this wages versus work free exchange appearance, the slavery has infiltrated as an abuse of fundamental human freedoms, especially that of the free choice or rest and socializing with family and friends. Instead of taking its self-esteem out of this close social environment, it is manipulated to take it from non-specific areas. The modern order taker accepts to sale its freedom by the very execution of these orders in exchange for less important liberties, such as a false illusion of respect or social ascension from unknown persons or distant acquaintances.

Under a complex system of polling public opinion, the contemporary capitalism manages to determine the order taker degree of social unrest temper it with optimistic messages, entertainment or even offering wage increases. These measures are meant to lower down the slavery pressures and offer the order taker longer moments of rest. The holidays or the weekend days off are other measures meant to relax the modern order taker and to reduce its typical revolt. Its life experience and wisdom that comes with age make her/him prefer less well paid but more relaxing jobs, than better paid, but more stressful ones.

The capitalist system comes with such jobs to meet this personal evolution. Here, unlike the classical slavery crime, where the master was willing to go to war periodically to conquer new slaves, or to stop a slave riot, the capitalism masked slavery has certain accelerator and brake pedals. The capitalism is horrified by public riots and has developed a whole mechanism of absorbing and converting popular anger. This can be converted into the fantasy war of games , into entertainment and the use of psychoactive substances, or even to the artificial creation of wars , in which those with a high riot potential are attracted and discreetly eliminated. These measures of global manipulation actually turn the medieval morality into profit. The capitalism masked slavery is a negotiable slavery. In the next section, which will become a sub-chapter, I will describe the diversified modern wage slavery methods of persuasion , unlike those of classical slavery, based on direct threats directed at the slave.

Gabriel Baldovin

6.5. Ideological and practical solutions to calm down the conflicts between conservative people and LDTB minority

6.5. Ideological and practical solutions to calm down the conflicts between conservative people and LDTB minority

sociologie Baldovin   13:34

Unsade the world! A Study on the Emotional Abuse and the Sexual Crimes and the Reactions towards them

6. Long-term solutions to stop sexual crimes and emotional abuses

6.5. Ideological and practical solutions to calm down the conflicts between conservative people and LDTB minority

This article continues the previous one

Click aici pentru varianta in limba romana

There is an old conflict between the conservative mentality and the eccentric sexual orientations ones or the asexuals. Many human lives have been sacrificed by burning at the stake, or for "fornication" reasons, or for sex with cosmic goats, as asexual women, who refused to marry, were believed to have. Today there still are some with appetite for witch hunts, and it is everyone's duty to remind them that they live in another century. Also, the eccentric sexual behaviors ones are at risk to develop paranoid predispositions towards the entire heterosexual majority, under the "identification with the aggressor" psychic mechanism. And we have also to remind them as well that they can see oppressors and persecutors everywhere, where do not exist, out of this repressive medieval cultural heritage that exists even in their own mentality. This article will provide ideological solutions to diminish this conflict.

Primitive and medieval prejudices in the persecution of the eccentric sexual orientations people

There are 5 traditional prejudices about homosexuality, namely that it is contagious, caused/conditioned by a specific opposite sex childhood education, that it is caused by a hyper libidinal need for sex or that these people stalk to rape children or adults. I analyzed and fought these theories in detail here http://baldovinconcept.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-same-sex-couples-and-their-opponents.html . I will not repeat this topic from the beginning, so those who want to find out about it can go and read it directly in the page linked above. Moreover, there are a lot of more detailed studies than I did like this one sau acesta . Those who judge with the intellect eyes and not with the primitive mental layers ones can be informed directly from there.

Basically, the eccentric libidinal orientations are negatively perceived by those who project their own uneducated fears into them. Of course, the exception is the pedophile disorder and sadism, which directly harm the partner. As do not know how to differentiate these two from the others, the common people believe that all eccentric libidinal orientations would cause such harm to others, which is not true. Such ideas are quite similar to the group-induced delirium practiced in the Middle Ages, and long after that, on women who refused to marry. And they were accused of witchcraft out of that. Today we have fun based on the ideas that a woman could travel on a broom until close to the moon in order to mate there with cosmic goats. But in those days thousands of women were burned at the stake on the basis of such delusional accusations. Such unfounded accusations were and still are made against the homosexuals and the sexual minority community (except for pedophile disorder and sadism) by some who have remained at the same level. If these ideas remain simple opinions, it would not be a problem. Unfortunately, they become real persecutions that the socially undeveloped ones bring against these people. They do not come out of a social exploitation and profit interest, but out of an uneducated fear, based on a primitive and classical society specific mentality.

The damage against the harmless eccentric libidinal orientations people

These fears are closer to religious beliefs than to scientific data. In addition to its core of "pure reason ideas", as described by the philosopher I. Kant, the religion was a traditional model of ethics, politics, law, and science, which vehemently opposed these practices. In the Old Testament there is said that God himself took cruel revenge on the famous cities of Sodom and Gomorrah for their sexual excesses. But these primitive norms are no longer viable in contemporary society. The sexuality and morality are two totally different things; there is no connection between them unless the sexual impulses violate the social norms. Those who literally violate them are only pedophile disorder and the sadism, and not the other sexual orientations on which these conservative persecutions are directed.

Both in the democratic tradition and no democratic countries there are hostile reactions to these people. Those uninformed or hostile to diversity are unjustifiably afraid of those with eccentric sexual orientations that they would infest them, or influence them in some way to become as they are. And because of this, these sexual minorities’ members have a real problem in finding partners or in expanding their selection area into not enough safe spaces to find the right partner there. Such a thing is an attack on the human right to communicate sexual orientation to potential partners, which is an attack on the human right to socialize and associate.

The eccentric sexual orientations people right to communicate their orientation in the global society, in the sense of finding potential partners

The gallant behavior regularizations are meant to favor finding the most suitable partner from the society wider side possible. If we look at the pre-courtship rules , we notice that, during its history, the society has created a good part of the culture precisely for these successful matings realization. In the same way, the sexual minorities such as homosexuals, prostitutes or histrionics have the right to find suitable partners in society, according to their own interests. Communicating the sexual preferences of a particular geographic or online space to the entire society should not be seen as an insult or an attempt to convert heterosexuals to these orientations. The blasphemous gay parades do not want to spread an LGBT "virus" that contaminates "healthy people" with an appetite for eccentric sexual behavior. They simply want to get up from the persecution fear state or the self-blaming those who do not have the courage to accept their sexual orientation, in order to broaden their coupling horizon. The search for a partner of the same orientation does not affect in any way the heterosexual ones, and in that first article linked above footnote I set out arguments in this regard.

The heterosexuals must not impose their own lifestyle on eccentrics and categorize their sexual orientation as moral or superior. The most equitable societies in the world today do not practice a democracy taken ad litteram, meaning a minority should obey to the majority in absolutely any matter. Such a thing is rather a dictatorship of the majority. A fair society is one that offers to any kind of minorities a development framework.

Solutions to stop the persecution towards the LGBT minority

The main solution lays in education, in information that everyone must take from credible resources until the official education will be able to do it systematically in the primary cycles. Unfortunately, this is not wanted in underdeveloped countries like Romania. Our current social system does not want certain people to get out of these prejudices. And this is how the social conflict arises. As the social system is a late medievalism, it does not care to educate the citizens, but to keep them with such prejudices. Of course, functioning as an enlightened slavery , the contemporary society takes advantage out of the citizens’ mental underdevelopment, being able to manipulate them for profit. The Romania 2019 referendum tried to politically exploit this issue. So, instead of a conducive education to this problem, it preferred to find a repressive pseudo-solution for it. Such medieval remnants in the contemporaries’ mentality against whom the school failed cannot be repressively eradicated.

This solution is the best, but it cannot be put into practice now. The underdeveloped persecutors education is a long-term solution. So it remains in our care, to us who possess truthful information on this subject, to spread it to those who do not have access to it. We also have the task of campaigning for this new type of modern slavery abolition and emancipating these people up from the ideological fog in which they are left.

The LGBT community members and related groups attempting to artificially expand the sexual selection area through the radical feminism rhetoric

As I said in this study , among this persecutory background against the marginalized, there came up the excesses coming from the people who belong to these sexual minorities, which I (and others) called "radical feminism", an extreme manifestation of the moderate, justifiable feminism. As in the open conflict with the majority, the radical feminists use the general feminism to gain as many rights as possible from here. The exclusive female courtship initiation theory, that I analyzed in the chapter 4 of this study , is such a feminist-radical counter-manifestation to the persecutory, traditionalist mentality. Basically, the LGBT community, and other groups close to it, has found this opportunity to express and broaden the choosing a partner horizon.

I have shown in this chapter that the oversized female frustration towards an unknown man who initiates courtship is caused by different interests. These are:

1. prostitutes more efficient strategy of financial gain;
2. a typical histrionic need for without stepping up to the couple relationship ;
3. the sadism, that some women also might have   ;
4. the envy on the heterosexual couple pattern   , as a of revenge on the heterosexuals easy way to find a partner .

Such an ideology has seduced the moderate feminists as well, because at first glance it promises superior rights. A good example is given by the married women whose libidinal appetite mismatches their husbands, as I have analyzed in detail here . They accept the exclusive female courtship initiation theory primarily because it favors them in the perspective of a new couple relationship with someone else that they can choose. Then, they accept it also because it favors them for a future justified negotiation about the number of sexual acts frequency or for the sexual behavior diversification, with the husband.

So the interests for its support are multiple, because the social groups that support it are diverse. Some single heterosexual women can temporarily support this proposal for a better negotiation in a future relationship. But most heterosexual women refuse it, as I have shown here . The segment age specific to the couples initiation, respectively the 17-27 years old, constantly uses the any kind of approach between unknown persons, be it initiated by men or women. This revolutionizing initiation activism forced application to this age segment is abusive even if it comes from the justifiable area of the emotional abuses and sexual crimes real victims. So, even according to the minority that obeys the majority political principle, the exclusive female courtship initiation (in order to form a couple) supporters will lose this war. And the danger of associating radical feminism with the dictatorial attitudes imposed by a minority can affect the image of feminism in general, that is, the moderate, justifiable one.

As I previously said, the exclusive female courtship initiation proposal secretly wants a partner's selection widening area for these sexual minorities and a facilitation of their meeting, protected from the persecutors reactions. The problem is that this rule does not precisely target the right partners for this type of women. The libidinal behavior of histrionic exhibitionists, for example, deceptively gives the normal men impression that they are in the 5th stage of courtship . Such intentionally wrong signaling to cause confusion makes sense only in their courtship interests, but not for the heterosexual women majority’s.

This rule extension to the age segment suited for this type of approach is for many of them a sign of the resentment with which they remained after the failure in this type of relationships. And, as I pointed out in this article and this one , the reasons for such a thing are very clear. From my point of view, they must demand their rights separately, without involving the majority of women, who are still part of the majority of society. That is why there have arisen strong conflicts within the feminism, as I have described here .

My view is that such a masked strategy by the uneducated heterosexual majority threats is inappropriate. Just as the heterosexuals should not impose their own lifestyle on the eccentrics and categorize their sexual orientation as moral or superior, in the same way the eccentrics should not do it for the heterosexuals. An individual education of these uneducated persecutors is much more efficient, as the authorities lack in action. Unfortunately, the each of us passivity towards this topic can have a setback in these feminist-radical manifestations, that can attack ourselves, from the our own barricade area.

Short-term practical solutions for the LGBT community and related groups to find partners and avoid persecution by the conservatives

There are short-term solutions to a more successful love life for eccentric groups, despite persecution from religious and conservative extremists. And the first one is the very giving up of the conflict with the society’s majority concerning the controversy of exclusive female courtship initiation theory. Forgetting about this false morals revolution improves its perception from the society. And, forgetting it, it gives up this feminism appetite for scandal against anything and everyone. The women and LGBT community have been and still are male abuses victims; but the revenge on every man or on everyone who accepts a common lifestyle does not solve anything. When an unknown man too explicitly initiates courtship, he violates much older social norms   than this proposal. So there is no need to issue other rules in this regard. But this violation is not so serious as to lead to scandals, as to radical feminists escalade to. It is enough to ignore such an unknown man who initiates too explicitly the courtship, but not offending him, which is a disproportionate response. I described in the linked above article several solutions to avoid these situations, if indeed those who complain about such a thing really want to avoid them.

In addition to reticence regarding this alleged general social norm, which is not commonly accepted and has not been generally discussed in society, there are personal or group ideological solutions to decrease these social conflicts. In the previous sections I have exposed such solutions to the particular interests of certain related social groups, such as those of the prostitutes , the histrionics or the normal heterosexual women in choosing a partner.

As can be seen, some of these solutions involve the persecutors education, which is a long-term solution, as mentioned above. I will continue with the practical solutions presentation, so that the sexual minorities can find their partner more easily, without risking negative reactions from socially underdeveloped people who cannot be educated so quickly. And, last but not least, for their inherent problems must not be accused the others, the neutral ones, as persecutors. These solutions are already being put into practice by those who really want to do so, and not to accuse heterosexuals of certain crimes.

Indeed, the social system – that is, most of us – must create a sexual space for these people, a street or even a locality where they can expose their forms, without being harassed by those who feel threatened by this behavior. I am convinced that many members of these communities would relocate to these places, and cease having contact with conservatives. Such a solution already exists for other this kind of social categories. For example, there are places specially designed for nudists, including exhibitionists. The famous Red District in Amsterdam is an example in which the female exhibitionism is practiced in specially designed places for those who are willing to accept such a challenge, and not later complain of sensory harassment. There are frequent messages in this space against taking their pictures by the visitors, in addition to the window protection. I pointed out in this article that such behavior is beneficial for both exhibitionists and tired couples. In trains there are wagons where the noise is forbidden and others where is accepted. In the same way, there must be clear spaces or distinctive signs for women who do not want to be approached by unknown men and others who communicate the availability for such contacts. Unfortunately, as the trains in Romania do not have such a thing yet, the society in general does not have such sexual minorities’ spaces either.

But still these sexual minorities’ communities can be created online, even without state intervention. There is such a thing in Romania and other states where this problem is ignored. Viable solutions can be found in which the women need for exhibitionism or histrionic seduction to manifest itself in special spaces, other than those populated by socially disadvantaged men. There are enough voyeurs who are not even interested in advancing in a couple's relationship with those they spy on. Also, the moderate sadist women can manifest their sexual orientation in a real space or online with men who have masochistic heterosexual tendencies. And so it can be done with all minorities. The condition is that this solution to be really wanted by those involved in and not the animosities provocation towards those neutral towards this problem. Blaming the neutrals for the conservative extremists’ persecution is inopportune. The neutral ones cannot be held responsible for the other ones errors. No one can be held responsible for not wanting to take part in this ideological war, as radical feminism suggests, although it would be good for the majority to get involved.

The civic repositioning of radical militancy

These are the peaceful solutions to avoid the sexual crimes and abuses, as well as the persecution by extremists. The repressive solution is not viable. The real solution to stop these abuses is not their formal, legal inhibition as effects. This means their superficial inhibition, through punishments applied after the deeds consumption. The police-justice mentality perpetuates the culture of fear, specific to the wild life. Civilization must solve them by acting on their causes. And the main cause of the middle and lower classes predisposition to abuse over the socially disadvantaged are the abuses that come hierarchically, from those who control the society’s levers.

Their militancy actually leads to the police state strengthening, and hence to the increase of the threats volume launched in the society. The result is an artificial amplification of the consumption needs, according to the converting trauma to psychodynamic arousal phenomenon. This has been observed by experimental psychologists Neal Elgar Miller and Robert A. Hinde. They showed that the painful physical shocks administration (such as electric or mechanical shocks) to rats and monkeys led to increased needs. Thus, the repressive threats strengthening against the potential sexual abusers leads to these predispositions to abuses increasing, rather than to their stopping. And this is the general paradoxical pattern of increasing crime rather than reducing it through repressive police solutions.

If we think about the marginalized ones persecutions, we find some justification for the radical feminism excesses, as reaction to their sufferance. However, such a solution of the criminal common rights restricting, or intensifying the threats against that person, in order not to commit certain acts, is specific to the repressive mentalities. The radical feminism fails to break out of the traditional society abuses vicious circle, as it inherits and to which it relates just as abusively. In this case, they show reverse sexism, as I shown in more details in this article .

This impossible combination between antipatriarchy and justice-repressive mentality, that some feminists support, is very strange. The repressive justice was created precisely by the "patriarchal" mentality and its main purpose is to preserve its values. Supporting the repressive mentality and eliminating "patriarchy" is equivalent to practicing prostitution for abstinence.

It is commendable that feminists condemn the fact that women are reduced to the value of objects of consumption. It is unfortunate, however, that they are very active in terms of sexual consumption of women and quite passive in terms of human consumption in general in contemporary civilized society, ie men.

Very few radical feminists are militant for granting rights to the citizens. These rights lead to bigger mental stability and a lower predisposition to abuse their own kinds and, implicitly, the women. Too few of them go to anti-war or pro-conservation environment mass meetings. The old idiom "to fiddle while Rome burns" perfectly suits them in terms of vehemence for the exclusive female courtship initiation implementation. Most of them have little interest or are not interested at all in the artificially initiated and consistently maintained wars around the world, or in pollution or in poverty in the developed countries. Fortunately, there are enough moderate feminists who respond to these issues as well. I met them at the Romanian protests. And they are the true heart of feminism and humanism alike. They are proof that the feminism has a strong, consistent basis in it. But it must take a closer look to the intentions and dubious vehemence of those who want to draw this movement into an obscure area.

The fact that radical feminists have a histrionic predisposition is not an impediment to doing remarkable things for society. Many artists were like that, so it was not a barrier for them to do great things. So, although I criticized the radical feminism in this study, I am still confident that in the future we will be on the same side of the "barricade".

Gabriel Baldovin

6.4. Ideological and practical solutions to avoid the disguised prostitution risks

6.4. Ideological and practical solutions to avoid the disguised prostitution risks

sociologie Baldovin   13:29

Unsade the world! A Study on the Emotional Abuse and the Sexual Crimes and the Reactions towards them

6. Long-term solutions to stop sexual crimes and emotional abuses

6.4. Ideological and practical solutions to avoid the disguised prostitution risks

This article continues the previous one

Click aici pentru varianta in limba romana

The disguise prostitute's life strategy mistakes

The LGBT community's contempt for tradition is somehow understood out of the disgrace that traditional society held on the eccentric sexual preferences ones. The feminism has backed up this community, as some of the most vehement activists are lesbians . It can be seen from a mile away that the exclusively female courtship initiation proposal violates and even excludes the preceding courtship traditional stages in favor of a single new rule. But the block rejection of the traditional pre-court rules by the new ones that favor their own lifestyle is not something accepted by all social categories.

Besides the lesbians, the disguise prostitutes also stand out. They are professionals in the sexual services commerce. They are very active on this matter because have a special interest in this new rule, in the sense that they look for wealthy men and try to seduce them in order to get as much money as possible out of it. Some do it constantly, others do it only occasionally. The passive women who occasionally practice disguised prostitution, depends on "luck". The paradox is that the most desired women are either lesbians or seductive histrionics. Well, they specifically sometimes practice the luxury prostitution.

The situations in which a woman sells her body for a large sum of money or a certain advantage are very common in the contemporary society, and at one point reached everyone's ears. These things have happened in the past, but they have been less well known. The film "Indecent Proposal" shocked 20 years ago by putting the married couple to the test. Today such a thing is practiced with no curtain, without much worry, as we can see in the social experiment below:


 

The internet is full of such married or relationship women who sell for a night out with an unknown man. The big confusion is that these women do not recognize their profession, and this even with the very social system “help”, which does not recognize it in the first place. In fact, they themselves practice it very rarely, respectively when the prospect of a big bucks hit appears on the horizon. So they would be difficult to monitor. But in general, the constant practice of luxury prostitution violates in particular the consumption code of the most countries laws, much more serious one than that on the prostitution illegality in general. The article 4 of the Directive 1998/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of prices of products offered to consumers says:

“The selling price must be unambiguous, easily identifiable and clearly legible”

The “U.S. Retail Pricing Laws and Regulations 2009” has mandatory clear prices directives for every state. For example Florida legislation has at Chapter 501, CONSUMER PROTECTION

“(6) DISPLAY AND ADVERTISING OF CONSUMER COMMODITY UNIT PRICES.--A seller shall conspicuously and clearly display the price per package or unit and the unit price in close proximity to the display of the commodity in such manner as may be established by rules of the department.”

Or Hawaii:

“§486-116 Misrepresentation of price. The price of consumer commodities, when offered for sale at retail, shall be clearly displayed and shall reflect the retail price at which the public may, without special credentials or other requirements, purchase the commodities.”

Being interested in getting as much as possible profit from their services, these women hide their jobs and, of course, do not display these prices. Also, the refusal to provide these services to those with low financial potential, out of the desire to get a better offer, violates the anti-discriminatory laws allover the world. There is a right to refuse service for different reasons, but not for being poor.

The (12) article of the Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 , says:

“…any direct or indirect discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation as regards the areas covered by this Directive should be prohibited throughout the Community.”

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e and following) prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants and employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin (including membership in a Native American tribe).

Those who practice luxury prostitution through hotel lobbies, various banquets, auction rooms and business meetings are already known to organizers and chase. So, they use the entrances or these places preceding spaces, to which less wealthy men have access, and here the problems come up. These women refusal to sell their services to less wealthy men clearly violates these laws. A club may deny access to a person inside, if it conflicts with customers or has poor hygiene. These are good reasons for refusing to provide a service. But the luxury prostitutes’ refusal to provide services to less wealthy clients is illegal for this reason.

Unfortunately, all this turns against them. I wrote in detail here about the enormous risks that the disguised prostitutes expose to. The famous Jack the Ripper killed prostitutes under the diabolical attempt to satisfy his disordered sadistic libido. Many of the missing women are in fact such sadists’ victims, lured by big sums of money. Besides these dubious financial interests, they are unable to explain some customers’ violence. And not having psychopathology studies, they attribute this violence to the patriarchal-oppressive mentality towards women, especially projected from their own paranoid psychopathological background. This is a metaphorical description of the sadism inside the civilization, but it is not yet a complete description. That's why the disguised prostitutes are probably the most vehement feminist-radical activists.

The fact that they complain about this scourge, and that the system protects their executioners, is fully justified. I also mentioned in this text how the authorities perversely leave open two loopholes in support of these sadistic murderers, without taking concrete measures to prevent them. The refusal to legalize and monitor women the women who decide to practice such a profession is such a support. Another measure is their demonization in order to lately justify these sadistic actions, as an act of justice. I showed in that article that such a mentality is directly formed by socially well-positioned sadists who kill prostitutes under justification of doing the society cleansing. These strategies for justifying one's own crimes or imperialist interests have been used consistently throughout history .

It is not normal for prostitutes to be so demonized, according to traditional custom. I repeat: it is the sadists and their colleagues who protect them main fault. But, it seems to me an opposite pole exaggeration that these disguised prostitution practices should be declared honest occupations. And even less honest is to review the whole courtship mentality in the contemporary society, according to the disguised prostitutes’ illegal interests. I support the sex work legalization and monitoring so that the pricing policy is transparent. In this case the society would become more psychotherapeutic than that of the warriors, as it is now; the sadists could no longer find so many loopholes in the practice of their morbid pleasures on the prostitutes’ behalf.

We are all prey to this prejudice of traditional too harsh prostitutes’ condemnation. However, it is also your job as a woman to protect yourself from overlapping this negative image, even if this image has been abusively constructed in the past. This is the common mentality, which cannot be changed overnight. If you, as a woman, choose to waste your body of and sell it as a package, contrary to your selective sexual instinct, do not be surprised that your inner psychic conflicts are accentuated, or that you are treated like a whore by the society! It takes certain stoicism from your counterpart as a woman in the face of this mechanism, evil indeed, in which you are attracted. The feminist attempt to transform the bitch perception into a respectable woman, in the public opinion’s eyes, will not succeed. Neither the feminist theories mother will turn the prostitutes into anything other than whores, since they themselves are reduced to consumption objects.

In their discourse, many feminists complain about the "women’s objectification" *, especially as it appears in pornographic materials. Apart from the fact that the used formula is inappropriate, even if it is understood by the majority, such a women dehumanization is accepted by the contemporary feminists themselves, by accepting the prostitution itself. The theory of "is my body, not the state’s" is totally justified until it reaches "and I can do anything with it". I believe that the woman has the right to decide if she wants to terminate the pregnancy. The state must have nothing to say in this decision, and there must be no institution to manipulate it to change her mind. Eventually, the state only has to assist her psychotherapeutically, if she decides to have an abortion, or financially if she decides to give birth. But walking naked among the frustrated men, like the limousine sly dogs, is not exactly a decent thing. The influence that the naked female body has on the disadvantaged backgrounds men is not related to any norm that could change their behavior.

The notion of "objectification" also takes some counter-reactive aspect in the radical feminism rhetoric . They complain about this "objectifying" dehumanization in the context in which the money proposed by a client is about an average wage. If the money turns into thousands and hundreds of thousands, then the same thing means "respect" for them. Although they speak of the “women objectification" in any possible (non-erotic) context, they themselves turn the ideal man into a no initiative object, so they can more easily choose from the mass of material and financial uninteresting men. They have the arrogant ambition to see the world at their feet, possibly to be turned into a religious worship object (out of the sexual "object"!), just because they are attractive.

I support a decent income for anyone who does a service to contemporary society. But when the greed is too big, things can go crazy. And if we evaluate the acting value of mimicking orgasm and "falling in love" with a libidinous grandpa, I think their income claim is a bit high. This greed of someone who earns more than returns to society, through its work, will be found somewhere, somehow in the other people misery of not receiving enough for what they offer. And, the paradox is that they can fall into such a trap themselves: although they think they fool the rich and perverted grandpa, at some point they can fall prey themselves to such a sadistic murderer, who make them disappear forever. And then did they get enough for their lives?

Mistakes in the life strategy of the interest married women

I have always shown in this text why the radical feminist slogan "all men are rapists" is in fact erroneous. But I've also shown here that it's much safer for women to behave accordingly. And for this reason many behave according to it, totally justified. But beyond that, the paradoxical, ambivalent success of radical feminism among heterosexual common women is also due to couple relationship issues. And these issues generally start from the lack of concordance between the male and female libido intensity that I mentioned in subsection 4.3.

The support for the sexual intercourse initiation exclusively by the woman in a marriage relationship is totally justified. There is a natural biological discrepancy and then a cultural one between the libidinal intensity related to the two sexes, so harmonizing to the woman's rhythm is a good solution. I think many marriages in the Western world would be saved that way, and most elderly couples have even gone through such an initiation revolution, which they have happily negotiated over time. Even if there is an official marital or couple relationship, the man commits an abuse if he initiates sexual intercourse without the woman's consent. The women in this situation feel trapped in those marriages as in prison. That is why they feel even more confused about meeting a street court initiator. Because, beyond the frustration made by the unknown man courtship initiating itself , these women experience also the inner conflict between accepting the initiator courtship, or remaining in the marriage. And these couple unresolved issues make the meeting a courtship initiator frustration even bigger, even if he is discreet.

The couple problems can be solved through open dialogue, but there are some that simply have no solution. This is when husbands have evolved differently in terms of increasing or decreasing sexual appetite. For the latter case, there are compromise solutions, but in the former case, there is little chance of saving the couple, in which both partners will be satisfied. A very active libido can be partially satisfied in the way the sadists satisfy their morbid tendencies with prostitutes. In the family and community they may seem like model husbands and citizens. But from time to time they go and disfigure prostitutes. Some kill them, as I have shown here . Most people, however, practice sexual behaviors with their partner that they do not consent to, as I have shown here and noticeable in the below video


 

Sexual appetite mismatch should be a failed marriage clue for all women from the beginning of the relationship. Many women believe that such a problem will be solved in time. But in fact it will even deepen. Others do not know about it because there was no probationary period between the future spouses. In the past, the sex life came after marriage. But such a period is still not safe for a long and healthy relationship, because the two partners can lie to each other. The man may not be honest enough with communicating his sexual needs. The woman can also make a first compromise with these eccentric predispositions from the beginning, believing that she will get used to them along the way. In both cases, the relationship continuation, be it marital, is quite close to disguised prostitution , with all the risks that such a thing involve, including low self-esteem.

Unfortunately, there are quite a few women who indulge in a kind of compromise in selling their bodies for material benefits. The overly pragmatic, non sentimental-minded mentality, which ends in marriage, is the one that accentuates this kind of frustration in the long run. A very active man on the labor market, who earns very well and brings certain prosperity in the family, usually comes with a bizarre reverse of the medal. He is very likely to have a dubious sex life. The undeclared polygamy , and the implicit suffering spread among the women in his life, is "the least evil." Others have an eccentric sexuality that makes sick their wives, that has chosen her husband more with the mind than with the heart.

I have also mentioned in previous articles that the shadow rulers of the society are the first to blame for first attracting young people to these repressive areas such as the army or the police. The society is the first that does not clearly communicate to a young person about the risks of psychopathological deformity that such institutions career brings. They develop over time at least a hyper-libidinal predisposition, in addition to the natural one, towards their partner. In the worst case, they will eventually develop such morbid predispositions to eccentric sexuality, to which the partner does not consent. The couple's relationship, already affected from the first place, ends up eroding in the long run. Our society sadistically practice - how else? - programming the long-term couples destruction by attracting the boys to these deadly areas. The humanity perverse social elite lure them with attractive wages with which they buy their wives. This is the second measure of sadists’ protection, in addition to the prostitution non-legalization, which I mentioned above. The much higher wages than the economy average, given to those who work in the repressive fields, is to convince their wives to stay with them, after they abuse them in every way. Their predisposition to contempt for all that femininity means is meant to later justify their crimes.

Unfortunately, the woman also contributes to such a situation through passivity and indecision. The society is also to blame for not telling her that she will never be able to reconcile with her partner's sexual quirks. But still, because she accepts them from the very beginning, and is willing to endure them, she also agrees to this situation. She cannot decide between the material comfort brought by such a man, and the suffering she endures in bed from him. She gets caught in this material goods trap. That is why many married women in this way came close to the border with disguised prostitution. After a while she finds out that is unhappy in that marriage. Some women inability to make a firm decision about their lives is then reflected in the couple's relationship. It takes a certain dose of stoicism, endurance in the face of this higher standard of living lure, but which also comes with such increasing over time frustrations.

Compromises that some women make in choosing husband and the radical feminism predisposition

When she then meets a peaceful conversation initiator on the street, such a woman sees in him exactly the abusive husband. She explodes to insult and humiliate him, after has inhibited her frustration with her husband for a shorter or longer period, as I have shown here . I do not necessarily consider here the reaction towards an initiator who violates the courtship preceding 4th rule , namely belonging to the same social class as the approached woman. Her reaction is disproportionate because the social rule he violated has been constantly ignored by the modern society. However, although this rule has lost its consistency in the modern era, still it has not completely disappeared. But its violation can no longer be blamed on anyone, as long as the society itself does not take it very seriously.

But this kind of reaction also occurs to the same social class courtship initiator as the woman approached, and the approach is discreet, such as greeting or daily gestures to attract attention. Of course, when the approach is too explicit, the initiator violates the traditional pre-courtship stages . In this case, he causes a certain frustration to the approached woman with his direct proposal to build a couple. But an ultra-aggressive response to this approach is disproportionate. The courtship stages, as I have described them in the above linked article, are particular rules of social caste, learned in the family, through education. They are not general rules of society like the ones I've wrote about here . Therefore, these stages violation cannot even be blamed on such a courtship initiator, as long as the society did not communicate them to him in school, through education.

Such an ultra-aggressive response may come from a radical feminist like the ones I described here . Being educated in an ambivalent regime of pampering and repression , this is how they understand to "educate" other members of society, which is, through aggression. Unfortunately, such an aggressive response can also come from a married woman to such an abusive husband in intimate relationships, to which she does not directly protest. Such a reaction shows the couple's personal problems rather than a normal reaction to that man slight violation of social norms committed. She doesn't want to face her husband because, if she did, then would risk divorce and the loss of the material comfort he brings. This type of women must show verticality in facing the issue of this compromise they make in their lives. They need to discuss this issue directly with their spouses and not with society. For now, there are no tools to solve this problem, except divorce. And the woman is the only one who has to make this decision.

The society must also react cleverly to these problems, kept away by the sadists who rule from the shadows. But we see how these hidden problems suddenly erupted. Beyond the exaggerations, there are serious emotional problems that the contemporary lifestyle brings. Maybe our whole concept of marriage needs to be overhauled. In addition to physical compatibility or ideas, the partners must pay attention to their sexual appetite compatibility, but also their sexual orientation. I repeat the argument mentioned above: it is not all right for women to be fooled by a superior lifestyle through a marriage that seems lucky at first, in exchange for accepting a sexual behavior to which they do not consent. Something like that threw the prostitutes image on them, with a decrease in self-esteem. And from here come, their sympathy, even if ambivalent, for the radical feminist ideas. But there is also a need for balance from the victims’ side. If you woman decide to marry a man who works in repressive institutions (army, police, justice, civil espionage) and has a higher wage than in other fields, then you take such risks. Women themselves must test their sex life before marriage, and decide what way of life they want in it in the future. They must also choose between the marital comforts offered by such a marital abuser with all the marriage’s abuses resulting from his libido disorder.

Given that neither the married women with inferior sexual appetite, nor the prostitutes, and nor the histrionic women have satisfaction in their sexual activities, and accept them out of interests of various material gains, it is even hypocritical to complain about the minor frustration produced by such of an unknown man greeting or complimenting you in the populated public space. Of course, if this experience repeats, as in the case of famous or very beautiful women, than it can bring bigger frustration. But these are exceptional cases. In the next article I will also describe the practical and ideological repositioning solutions of lesbian women regarding the radical feminist exaggerations militancy (not all lesbians are radical feminists)

** By the phrase "women objectification" the feminists complain about the men (or just some of them) lack of empathy in love affairs. The lament about the loss of the contemporary erotic spark is justified, but it is a relentless phenomenon. The capitalism reduces everything to money, including the women. But the term "objectification" is somehow used in a street, pejorative sense, inferior to the human being state. And this is not exactly fair, if we consider that the object is the second unit of the world, in philosophy, after the atom. In the idealistic philosophies, the objectification is the spirit transposition into the matter. For example, in Hegel’s, the state is the objectification of the common good. I believe that for higher precision, and in accordance with the much older than feminism theories, the term "objectification" should be replaced by "consumption". It is not the first time in history that a popular thinking has taken terms from specialized language, and given them different meanings, after misunderstood them. The street felt the need to reduce the unity of the world concept to the term "inanimate object" and "living being," although, ontologically, the "being" and the "object" are one and the same. Is not a good choice to give a different meaning to the term "object" than the one stated in the history of science and philosophy.

Then, it should be noted that such a deformation conflicts with the psychoanalytic terminology. The sexuality itself is naturally objectifying. The satisfaction with which nature has decorated it does not come from any special "subjective" quality of the person that has sexual activity with. The fact that it is rewarded by nature with orgasm shows the sexuality "objectifying" nature. Any pleasure, whether raw (instinctual) or evolved, develops in relation to a certain object of pleasure. The orgasm is not a culmination of the moral qualities that the partners plant in each other's bodies. The literature beautifully lie to us that this would happen, but the scientific reality shows that sexual mating takes place according to common mechanical rules. Choosing from a spectrum of suitors, femininity simply chooses the alpha male. Sometimes she can consciously, assumedly, sublimate this decision in favor of the male supposed moral qualities. But in reality it is an alpha male objectification.

Gabriel Baldovin