Baldovin Concept censured on Facebook

(ro- for English scroll down) Baldovin Concept a fost pentru o perioada in imposibilitate de a fi publicat pe Facebook. Probabil ca unii dusmani ai sigurantei femeilor au fost deranjati de articolele scrse aici in ultimul an, si l-au raportat masiv ca spam, desi continutul sau nu contine reclame si nu vinde nimic. La rugamintile mele, dvs. cititorii ati contraraportat ca spatiu sigur care nu incalca standarderele comunitatii, pentru care va multumesc.

Eng- Baldovin Concept was for some time banned to be published on Facebook. Probably some women's security enemies were disturbed by the last year's articles I wrote here and received multiple negative spam reports to Facebook, although its content doesn’t contain advertising or any kind of commerce. But due to my asking for help, you the readers counter-reported this space as safe, not going against the Facebook Community Standards, so I thank you for that.

29 septembrie 2021

6.4. Ideological and practical solutions to avoid the disguised prostitution risks

6. Long-term solutions to stop sexual crimes and emotional abuses

6.4. Ideological and practical solutions to avoid the disguised prostitution risks

Click aici pentru varianta in limba romana

The disguise prostitute's life strategy mistakes

The LGBT community's contempt for tradition is somehow understood out of the disgrace that traditional society held on the eccentric sexual preferences ones. The feminism has backed up this community, as some of the most vehement activists are lesbians . It can be seen from a mile away that the exclusively female courtship initiation proposal violates and even excludes the preceding courtship traditional stages in favor of a single new rule. But the block rejection of the traditional pre-court rules by the new ones that favor their own lifestyle is not something accepted by all social categories.

Besides the lesbians, the disguise prostitutes also stand out. They are professionals in the sexual services commerce. They are very active on this matter because have a special interest in this new rule, in the sense that they look for wealthy men and try to seduce them in order to get as much money as possible out of it. Some do it constantly, others do it only occasionally. The passive women who occasionally practice disguised prostitution, depends on "luck". The paradox is that the most desired women are either lesbians or seductive histrionics. Well, they specifically sometimes practice the luxury prostitution.

The situations in which a woman sells her body for a large sum of money or a certain advantage are very common in the contemporary society, and at one point reached everyone's ears. These things have happened in the past, but they have been less well known. The film "Indecent Proposal" shocked 20 years ago by putting the married couple to the test. Today such a thing is practiced with no curtain, without much worry, as we can see in the social experiment below:


The internet is full of such married or relationship women who sell for a night out with an unknown man. The big confusion is that these women do not recognize their profession, and this even with the very social system “help”, which does not recognize it in the first place. In fact, they themselves practice it very rarely, respectively when the prospect of a big bucks hit appears on the horizon. So they would be difficult to monitor. But in general, the constant practice of luxury prostitution violates in particular the consumption code of the most countries laws, much more serious one than that on the prostitution illegality in general. The article 4 of the Directive 1998/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of prices of products offered to consumers says:

“The selling price must be unambiguous, easily identifiable and clearly legible”

The “U.S. Retail Pricing Laws and Regulations 2009” has mandatory clear prices directives for every state. For example Florida legislation has at Chapter 501, CONSUMER PROTECTION

“(6) DISPLAY AND ADVERTISING OF CONSUMER COMMODITY UNIT PRICES.--A seller shall conspicuously and clearly display the price per package or unit and the unit price in close proximity to the display of the commodity in such manner as may be established by rules of the department.”

Or Hawaii:

“§486-116 Misrepresentation of price. The price of consumer commodities, when offered for sale at retail, shall be clearly displayed and shall reflect the retail price at which the public may, without special credentials or other requirements, purchase the commodities.”

Being interested in getting as much as possible profit from their services, these women hide their jobs and, of course, do not display these prices. Also, the refusal to provide these services to those with low financial potential, out of the desire to get a better offer, violates the anti-discriminatory laws allover the world. There is a right to refuse service for different reasons, but not for being poor.

The (12) article of the Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 , says:

“…any direct or indirect discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation as regards the areas covered by this Directive should be prohibited throughout the Community.”

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e and following) prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants and employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin (including membership in a Native American tribe).

Those who practice luxury prostitution through hotel lobbies, various banquets, auction rooms and business meetings are already known to organizers and chase. So, they use the entrances or these places preceding spaces, to which less wealthy men have access, and here the problems come up. These women refusal to sell their services to less wealthy men clearly violates these laws. A club may deny access to a person inside, if it conflicts with customers or has poor hygiene. These are good reasons for refusing to provide a service. But the luxury prostitutes’ refusal to provide services to less wealthy clients is illegal for this reason.

Unfortunately, all this turns against them. I wrote in detail here about the enormous risks that the disguised prostitutes expose to. The famous Jack the Ripper killed prostitutes under the diabolical attempt to satisfy his disordered sadistic libido. Many of the missing women are in fact such sadists’ victims, lured by big sums of money. Besides these dubious financial interests, they are unable to explain some customers’ violence. And not having psychopathology studies, they attribute this violence to the patriarchal-oppressive mentality towards women, especially projected from their own paranoid psychopathological background. This is a metaphorical description of the sadism inside the civilization, but it is not yet a complete description. That's why the disguised prostitutes are probably the most vehement feminist-radical activists.

The fact that they complain about this scourge, and that the system protects their executioners, is fully justified. I also mentioned in this text how the authorities perversely leave open two loopholes in support of these sadistic murderers, without taking concrete measures to prevent them. The refusal to legalize and monitor women the women who decide to practice such a profession is such a support. Another measure is their demonization in order to lately justify these sadistic actions, as an act of justice. I showed in that article that such a mentality is directly formed by socially well-positioned sadists who kill prostitutes under justification of doing the society cleansing. These strategies for justifying one's own crimes or imperialist interests have been used consistently throughout history .

It is not normal for prostitutes to be so demonized, according to traditional custom. I repeat: it is the sadists and their colleagues who protect them main fault. But, it seems to me an opposite pole exaggeration that these disguised prostitution practices should be declared honest occupations. And even less honest is to review the whole courtship mentality in the contemporary society, according to the disguised prostitutes’ illegal interests. I support the sex work legalization and monitoring so that the pricing policy is transparent. In this case the society would become more psychotherapeutic than that of the warriors, as it is now; the sadists could no longer find so many loopholes in the practice of their morbid pleasures on the prostitutes’ behalf.

We are all prey to this prejudice of traditional too harsh prostitutes’ condemnation. However, it is also your job as a woman to protect yourself from overlapping this negative image, even if this image has been abusively constructed in the past. This is the common mentality, which cannot be changed overnight. If you, as a woman, choose to waste your body of and sell it as a package, contrary to your selective sexual instinct, do not be surprised that your inner psychic conflicts are accentuated, or that you are treated like a whore by the society! It takes certain stoicism from your counterpart as a woman in the face of this mechanism, evil indeed, in which you are attracted. The feminist attempt to transform the bitch perception into a respectable woman, in the public opinion’s eyes, will not succeed. Neither the feminist theories mother will turn the prostitutes into anything other than whores, since they themselves are reduced to consumption objects.

In their discourse, many feminists complain about the "women’s objectification" *, especially as it appears in pornographic materials. Apart from the fact that the used formula is inappropriate, even if it is understood by the majority, such a women dehumanization is accepted by the contemporary feminists themselves, by accepting the prostitution itself. The theory of "is my body, not the state’s" is totally justified until it reaches "and I can do anything with it". I believe that the woman has the right to decide if she wants to terminate the pregnancy. The state must have nothing to say in this decision, and there must be no institution to manipulate it to change her mind. Eventually, the state only has to assist her psychotherapeutically, if she decides to have an abortion, or financially if she decides to give birth. But walking naked among the frustrated men, like the limousine sly dogs, is not exactly a decent thing. The influence that the naked female body has on the disadvantaged backgrounds men is not related to any norm that could change their behavior.

The notion of "objectification" also takes some counter-reactive aspect in the radical feminism rhetoric . They complain about this "objectifying" dehumanization in the context in which the money proposed by a client is about an average wage. If the money turns into thousands and hundreds of thousands, then the same thing means "respect" for them. Although they speak of the “women objectification" in any possible (non-erotic) context, they themselves turn the ideal man into a no initiative object, so they can more easily choose from the mass of material and financial uninteresting men. They have the arrogant ambition to see the world at their feet, possibly to be turned into a religious worship object (out of the sexual "object"!), just because they are attractive.

I support a decent income for anyone who does a service to contemporary society. But when the greed is too big, things can go crazy. And if we evaluate the acting value of mimicking orgasm and "falling in love" with a libidinous grandpa, I think their income claim is a bit high. This greed of someone who earns more than returns to society, through its work, will be found somewhere, somehow in the other people misery of not receiving enough for what they offer. And, the paradox is that they can fall into such a trap themselves: although they think they fool the rich and perverted grandpa, at some point they can fall prey themselves to such a sadistic murderer, who make them disappear forever. And then did they get enough for their lives?

Mistakes in the life strategy of the interest married women

I have always shown in this text why the radical feminist slogan "all men are rapists" is in fact erroneous. But I've also shown here that it's much safer for women to behave accordingly. And for this reason many behave according to it, totally justified. But beyond that, the paradoxical, ambivalent success of radical feminism among heterosexual common women is also due to couple relationship issues. And these issues generally start from the lack of concordance between the male and female libido intensity that I mentioned in subsection 4.3.

The support for the sexual intercourse initiation exclusively by the woman in a marriage relationship is totally justified. There is a natural biological discrepancy and then a cultural one between the libidinal intensity related to the two sexes, so harmonizing to the woman's rhythm is a good solution. I think many marriages in the Western world would be saved that way, and most elderly couples have even gone through such an initiation revolution, which they have happily negotiated over time. Even if there is an official marital or couple relationship, the man commits an abuse if he initiates sexual intercourse without the woman's consent. The women in this situation feel trapped in those marriages as in prison. That is why they feel even more confused about meeting a street court initiator. Because, beyond the frustration made by the unknown man courtship initiating itself , these women experience also the inner conflict between accepting the initiator courtship, or remaining in the marriage. And these couple unresolved issues make the meeting a courtship initiator frustration even bigger, even if he is discreet.

The couple problems can be solved through open dialogue, but there are some that simply have no solution. This is when husbands have evolved differently in terms of increasing or decreasing sexual appetite. For the latter case, there are compromise solutions, but in the former case, there is little chance of saving the couple, in which both partners will be satisfied. A very active libido can be partially satisfied in the way the sadists satisfy their morbid tendencies with prostitutes. In the family and community they may seem like model husbands and citizens. But from time to time they go and disfigure prostitutes. Some kill them, as I have shown here . Most people, however, practice sexual behaviors with their partner that they do not consent to, as I have shown here and noticeable in the below video


Sexual appetite mismatch should be a failed marriage clue for all women from the beginning of the relationship. Many women believe that such a problem will be solved in time. But in fact it will even deepen. Others do not know about it because there was no probationary period between the future spouses. In the past, the sex life came after marriage. But such a period is still not safe for a long and healthy relationship, because the two partners can lie to each other. The man may not be honest enough with communicating his sexual needs. The woman can also make a first compromise with these eccentric predispositions from the beginning, believing that she will get used to them along the way. In both cases, the relationship continuation, be it marital, is quite close to disguised prostitution , with all the risks that such a thing involve, including low self-esteem.

Unfortunately, there are quite a few women who indulge in a kind of compromise in selling their bodies for material benefits. The overly pragmatic, non sentimental-minded mentality, which ends in marriage, is the one that accentuates this kind of frustration in the long run. A very active man on the labor market, who earns very well and brings certain prosperity in the family, usually comes with a bizarre reverse of the medal. He is very likely to have a dubious sex life. The undeclared polygamy , and the implicit suffering spread among the women in his life, is "the least evil." Others have an eccentric sexuality that makes sick their wives, that has chosen her husband more with the mind than with the heart.

I have also mentioned in previous articles that the shadow rulers of the society are the first to blame for first attracting young people to these repressive areas such as the army or the police. The society is the first that does not clearly communicate to a young person about the risks of psychopathological deformity that such institutions career brings. They develop over time at least a hyper-libidinal predisposition, in addition to the natural one, towards their partner. In the worst case, they will eventually develop such morbid predispositions to eccentric sexuality, to which the partner does not consent. The couple's relationship, already affected from the first place, ends up eroding in the long run. Our society sadistically practice - how else? - programming the long-term couples destruction by attracting the boys to these deadly areas. The humanity perverse social elite lure them with attractive wages with which they buy their wives. This is the second measure of sadists’ protection, in addition to the prostitution non-legalization, which I mentioned above. The much higher wages than the economy average, given to those who work in the repressive fields, is to convince their wives to stay with them, after they abuse them in every way. Their predisposition to contempt for all that femininity means is meant to later justify their crimes.

Unfortunately, the woman also contributes to such a situation through passivity and indecision. The society is also to blame for not telling her that she will never be able to reconcile with her partner's sexual quirks. But still, because she accepts them from the very beginning, and is willing to endure them, she also agrees to this situation. She cannot decide between the material comfort brought by such a man, and the suffering she endures in bed from him. She gets caught in this material goods trap. That is why many married women in this way came close to the border with disguised prostitution. After a while she finds out that is unhappy in that marriage. Some women inability to make a firm decision about their lives is then reflected in the couple's relationship. It takes a certain dose of stoicism, endurance in the face of this higher standard of living lure, but which also comes with such increasing over time frustrations.

Compromises that some women make in choosing husband and the radical feminism predisposition

When she then meets a peaceful conversation initiator on the street, such a woman sees in him exactly the abusive husband. She explodes to insult and humiliate him, after has inhibited her frustration with her husband for a shorter or longer period, as I have shown here . I do not necessarily consider here the reaction towards an initiator who violates the courtship preceding 4th rule , namely belonging to the same social class as the approached woman. Her reaction is disproportionate because the social rule he violated has been constantly ignored by the modern society. However, although this rule has lost its consistency in the modern era, still it has not completely disappeared. But its violation can no longer be blamed on anyone, as long as the society itself does not take it very seriously.

But this kind of reaction also occurs to the same social class courtship initiator as the woman approached, and the approach is discreet, such as greeting or daily gestures to attract attention. Of course, when the approach is too explicit, the initiator violates the traditional pre-courtship stages . In this case, he causes a certain frustration to the approached woman with his direct proposal to build a couple. But an ultra-aggressive response to this approach is disproportionate. The courtship stages, as I have described them in the above linked article, are particular rules of social caste, learned in the family, through education. They are not general rules of society like the ones I've wrote about here . Therefore, these stages violation cannot even be blamed on such a courtship initiator, as long as the society did not communicate them to him in school, through education.

Such an ultra-aggressive response may come from a radical feminist like the ones I described here . Being educated in an ambivalent regime of pampering and repression , this is how they understand to "educate" other members of society, which is, through aggression. Unfortunately, such an aggressive response can also come from a married woman to such an abusive husband in intimate relationships, to which she does not directly protest. Such a reaction shows the couple's personal problems rather than a normal reaction to that man slight violation of social norms committed. She doesn't want to face her husband because, if she did, then would risk divorce and the loss of the material comfort he brings. This type of women must show verticality in facing the issue of this compromise they make in their lives. They need to discuss this issue directly with their spouses and not with society. For now, there are no tools to solve this problem, except divorce. And the woman is the only one who has to make this decision.

The society must also react cleverly to these problems, kept away by the sadists who rule from the shadows. But we see how these hidden problems suddenly erupted. Beyond the exaggerations, there are serious emotional problems that the contemporary lifestyle brings. Maybe our whole concept of marriage needs to be overhauled. In addition to physical compatibility or ideas, the partners must pay attention to their sexual appetite compatibility, but also their sexual orientation. I repeat the argument mentioned above: it is not all right for women to be fooled by a superior lifestyle through a marriage that seems lucky at first, in exchange for accepting a sexual behavior to which they do not consent. Something like that threw the prostitutes image on them, with a decrease in self-esteem. And from here come, their sympathy, even if ambivalent, for the radical feminist ideas. But there is also a need for balance from the victims’ side. If you woman decide to marry a man who works in repressive institutions (army, police, justice, civil espionage) and has a higher wage than in other fields, then you take such risks. Women themselves must test their sex life before marriage, and decide what way of life they want in it in the future. They must also choose between the marital comforts offered by such a marital abuser with all the marriage’s abuses resulting from his libido disorder.

Given that neither the married women with inferior sexual appetite, nor the prostitutes, and nor the histrionic women have satisfaction in their sexual activities, and accept them out of interests of various material gains, it is even hypocritical to complain about the minor frustration produced by such of an unknown man greeting or complimenting you in the populated public space. Of course, if this experience repeats, as in the case of famous or very beautiful women, than it can bring bigger frustration. But these are exceptional cases. In the next article I will also describe the practical and ideological repositioning solutions of lesbian women regarding the radical feminist exaggerations militancy (not all lesbians are radical feminists)

** By the phrase "women objectification" the feminists complain about the men (or just some of them) lack of empathy in love affairs. The lament about the loss of the contemporary erotic spark is justified, but it is a relentless phenomenon. The capitalism reduces everything to money, including the women. But the term "objectification" is somehow used in a street, pejorative sense, inferior to the human being state. And this is not exactly fair, if we consider that the object is the second unit of the world, in philosophy, after the atom. In the idealistic philosophies, the objectification is the spirit transposition into the matter. For example, in Hegel’s, the state is the objectification of the common good. I believe that for higher precision, and in accordance with the much older than feminism theories, the term "objectification" should be replaced by "consumption". It is not the first time in history that a popular thinking has taken terms from specialized language, and given them different meanings, after misunderstood them. The street felt the need to reduce the unity of the world concept to the term "inanimate object" and "living being," although, ontologically, the "being" and the "object" are one and the same. Is not a good choice to give a different meaning to the term "object" than the one stated in the history of science and philosophy.

Then, it should be noted that such a deformation conflicts with the psychoanalytic terminology. The sexuality itself is naturally objectifying. The satisfaction with which nature has decorated it does not come from any special "subjective" quality of the person that has sexual activity with. The fact that it is rewarded by nature with orgasm shows the sexuality "objectifying" nature. Any pleasure, whether raw (instinctual) or evolved, develops in relation to a certain object of pleasure. The orgasm is not a culmination of the moral qualities that the partners plant in each other's bodies. The literature beautifully lie to us that this would happen, but the scientific reality shows that sexual mating takes place according to common mechanical rules. Choosing from a spectrum of suitors, femininity simply chooses the alpha male. Sometimes she can consciously, assumedly, sublimate this decision in favor of the male supposed moral qualities. But in reality it is an alpha male objectification.

Niciun comentariu:
Write comments

Popular Posts