5. The abuse against property through the direct threats

The similarities and differences between the classical slave and modern laborer 5. The abuse against property through the direct threats

Varianta in limba romana aici

Both classical slavery system and the contemporary social wage system constantly abuse fundamental and morally nonnegotiable properties that belong to its victims turned into servants. The abused person inconvenience is not itself a purpose but a way meant to persuade it to follow certain orders in exchange for its temporary suspension. These orders were given by those who in the past were called masters and who now call themselves employers, managers or leaders. If the servant follows these orders, then its fundamental and morally non-negotiable property is recognized. But if that person refuses to follow them, then its property is violated, abused. We note here decriminalization terminology of the new slavery: the idea lord almighty, copy (earthly) of God (or other gods) was replaced by the contractor to whom forgive the crimes of slavery in exchange for sharing with others profit off of the exploitation of labor servant.

In the classical slavery there were only two such fundamental and morally non-negotiable properties violated. The first one was the right to life and physical integrity and the other one was the slave right to any private property. The second one was never recognized. The first one was recognized only if the slave followed the orders. In the contemporary waged system these rights are somewhat formal and partially recognized for modern servants. But just like in traditional society, these rights remained totally recognized for those who are entitled to give orders.

Despite the multitude of objects that surround modern human being, there are 3 major fundamental and morally nonnegotiable properties that the social system breaks. The first one is the health itself, the second is the shelter and third one is the food. I will analyze them, one by one. The health is constantly attacked by contemporary pollution, both psychical and chemical. The mental pollution results from the stress negative influence on the human mind. The modern work stress is a camouflage for the classical slavery specific threats into the contemporary apparently free trade relations. The direct threats to life and to physical integrity specific classical slavery were replaced with the modern stress. We see here a classical slavery abuses hiding trick into the modern stress form but not a real ban for them. This concealing role is the protection for these threats origin. And the responsible for these abuses have been in the past and still are today, of course, the masters, the abuse profiteers. They "convince" both the classical slave and the modern worker to follow orders, which is to obey and serve. The difference between the classical slavery threats and the modern stress consists of secondary factors interposition into the relationship between the one who gives orders and who executes them. These factors act as a shield for a possible rebellion of the abused ones against the profiteers.

As the classical slavery specific threats were involving the death penalty, in the same way the stress leads to death. The difference between the two types of threats lies in the death occurrence time. The classical threat put it into practice immediately while the stress death occurs in long-term. The camouflage worked perfectly: no one knows what stresses had in the past the deceased from a disease or another. Its family could not identify the one who is responsible for bugging the deceased in the past to pull it accountable for their loved one fatal disease. And the master went away with the profit. In contrast, during the classical slavery, the descendants or friends of the punished one (for fleeing from work or not working well enough) can keep in mind this crime and revenge sooner or later. The psychosomatic medicine has started to make the connection between stress and diseases such as cancer, diabetes, or heart attack. Unfortunately, in the last 50 years it was strangled from development once of being suspected for getting in the way of the new masters interests. Fortunately, it managed yet to tell about these things through its pioneers. This data could not be removed from science history, but the new masters took care to prevent as many potential servants to get to it, hiding it by the consumerist culture which promotes exactly the opposite values of what it affirms.

Then, the chemical pollution is involuntarily produced on the one hand by the various substances used to make foods more resistant to degradation, more attractive and more desirable. Some of them were banned when their unhealthy effects became so visible that ended up as press subjects. Unfortunately, there are many others with similar long-term effects, which are not perceivable just yet. For this reason they have not been enough studied. Of course they are almost impossible to identify at this time.

But, on the other hand, in countries with high slavery infiltrated free trade relations, the harmful substances are in purpose added in food. This poor people poisoning program is practiced in parallel with the medical system abolishment, as the oligarchs who controlled society in the former Communist bloc countries did after the 1990. Like all slavery practices, even this practice is not made by the diabolical malice, but in the spirit of corporate cynical specific detachment that originates in the well-known "nothing personal, just business" calm indifference attitude. The servant death is actually a loss, of course, that the profiteers know to avoid. Interest is not sick but the death of his addiction medical system. This dependency purpose consists in the later profit. The partial food poisoning practice is meant to addict the modern servant to the medical system. And this addiction involves the global economy gear recruitment.

There are few countries that allow the hospitalization of a person who has no medical insurance. It comes after getting a job in the social system and never with the independence in getting the basic needs. Once entered into this trap, the servant can get out of it only by paying the price of illness and death eventually. As threatened with death by disease, the new servant is actually in the same situation as the classical slave.

It is a fact that the medicine has enormously progressed in the last hundred years. The civilized individual life expectancy increased from the industrial era during the nineteenth century. But it is still low if compared to a traditional lifestyle. The longevity records belong just to those who were lucky enough not to be touched by the "civilization" malefic influence. The medicine was able to add some decades to the contemporary person age but this luxury is paid with servant 'stage' in its youth. I regret to notice that in this of contemporary profiteering dirty plan are involved, unwillingly and without most of them knowledge, those who provide the most moral to the society services, namely the physicians.

So here's how the death threat can be found in the profits made from so-called free trade relations. The abused person environment is initially negatively affected, which involves the inability to negotiate a fair free trade. Like the classical slave, the modern worker has no choice but to accept those stressful, degrading or humiliating jobs that I discussed above.

Besides violating the health right, the modern slavery infiltrated in free trade relationships violate the right to decent housing and food. Like the classical slavery, there also exist radical differences between people in the case of the false free trade relationships. The bad health may be harder to detect with the naked eye. But the abuse against the right to decent housing and food is perhaps the most significant sign of slavery infiltration in the contractual labor relations.

Unfortunately, the threat of being fired and throwing out in the street is a common practice today for corporations in order to squeeze the last drops of profit out of people. Even in the most advanced social services Western countries, there are many cases of prolonged labor relations with various employers that do not provide decent food and shelter. A threatened by the chief worker with throwing out in the street, as not saved enough wealth to afford a longer or shorter temporary rest from this job, or a qualification in another field, is genuine wage slavery. Unfortunately, such a practice is the contemporary economy engine. It forces the individual free will to the servitute and slavery, just as the sequestration slavery death threat did in the classical period that I analyzed above.

This entry continues here:

Gabriel Baldovin

»»  read more

5.2. Abuzul asupra proprietatii prin amenintarile directe

Asemanari si deosebiri intre sclavul clasic si muncitorul modern 5. Abuzul asupra proprietatii prin amenintarile directe (continuare)

Acest articol se continua de aici

Aceste drepturi trebuie sa fie fundamentale si nenegociabile intr-o societate cu adevarat civilizata. Salariul mic pentru o parte din membrii unei comunitati, insuficient pentru asigurarea lor arata mai curand o pojghita de civilizatie in care este ambalata frumos o societate ce functioneaza inca cu principiile tipice ale sclaviei. Aceste abuzuri sunt la fel de dramatice si de psihogene precum cel asupra dreptului la viata operat in perioada clasica de catre sclavia de sechestrare. Incalcarea acestor drepturi fundamentale insa atrage si abuzul sau specific, respectiv insusi dreptul la viata. Articolul 25 din carta drepturilor omului http://legislatie.resurse-pentru-democratie.org/legea/declaratia-universala-a-drepturilor-omului.php, sunt stipulate destul de clar aceste drepturi:

”Orice om are dreptul la un nivel de trai care sa-i asigure sanatatea si bunastarea lui si familiei sale, cuprinzand hrana, imbracamintea, locuinta, ingrijirea medicala, precum si serviciile sociale necesare”

Remarc insa si in acest caz modul defectuos in care sunt afirmate aceste drepturi. Ele nu trebuie plasate la sfarsitul ci chiar la inceputul acestui sir de drepturi mai mult sau mai putin importante. Din punctul meu de vedere ele trebuie plasate imediat dupa cel al articolului 3 care spune ca „Orice fiinta umana are dreptul la viata, la libertate si la securitatea persoanei sale.”. Fara acest drept stipulat de articolul 25, acest Articol 3 devine si el nul, inaplicabil, abstract, doar pe hartie.

In foarte multe dintre tarile civilizate (exceptand pe cele nord-europene), vedem multe persoane fara adapost. Acesti oameni isi iau hrana din gunoaie, deci putem deduce ca nici acest drept nu este asigurat. Mai mult decat atat, in multe tari Europene si SUA se pun tepi pe sub poduri pentru a alunga persoanele fara adapost, dupa ce au fost initial folosite in China. Nu doar ca aceste drepturi prevazute de articolul 25 nu sunt aplicate nici in cele mai ingamfate democratii din lume. Dimpotriva, aceste „tari civilizate” chiar actioneaza cu predilectie impotriva acestor drepturi fundamentale ale omului recunoscute de emulatia Revolutiei Franceze si perfectate dupa cel de-al doilea razboi mondial. Declaratia Universala a Drepturilor Omului a fost adoptata la 10 decembrie 1948, prin Rezolutia 217 A in cadrul celei de-a treia sesiuni a Adunarii Generale a Organizatiei Natiunilor Unite, dupa cum se poate vedea aici (original aici ).

Carta drepturilor omului este un ghid esential in relatiile interumane contemporane. Tocmai acest lucru s-a avut in vedere in momentul in care ea a fost elaborata, respectiv o reala abolire a sclaviei clasice. Cand a venit vorba sa si fie puse in practica aceste principii ideale, lucrurile s-au impotmolit. Cei care au cerut aceste drepturi in gura mare le-au primit si au fost convinsi sa o lase mai moale. Cei care nu au stiut sa si le ceara au ramas in continuare in intuneric. Asa ca al doilea nivel al legilor, respectiv constitutiile statelor, ignora intr-un prim grad articolele 25 si 13 din Carta drepturilor omului.

Conform wikipedia, exista noua tari in care dreptul la hrana este clar scris in constitutie. Ele sunt Bolivia, Brazilia, Ecuador, Guyana, Haiti, Kenya, Africa de Sud si Nepal. Din nefericire aceste state sunt cam vestite pentru caracterul „decorativ” al constitutiilor lor, neaplicabil de catre guvernele implicate in deciziile statelor respective. Realitatea este ca nici un stat nu iti ofera nimic din aceste drepturi, ci tu ca individ trebuie sa te lupti singur pentru a ti le asigura.

Constitutia SUA nu prevede nici un fel de reglementare privind garantarea acestui drept. In constitutia Frantei se mentioneaza ca „Fiecare persoana are obligatia de a munci si dreptul la loc de munca” In Articolul 47 din Constitutia Romaniei se spune ca

„(1) Statul este obligat sa ia masuri de dezvoltare economica si de protectie sociala, de natura sa asigure cetatenilor un nivel de trai decent.”

Se poate vedea cum acest „drept fundamental” este afirmat cu tarie doar atunci cand „civilizatia” contemporana vrea sa isi afirme echitatea. Insa atunci cand se pune problema aplicabilitatii acestor principii, spiritul lor se dilueaza si se pierd ca in ceata. Statul nu mai este obligat sa urmeze aceste drepturi fundamentale, ci doar sa ia masuri. Adica ar vrea el (sau, mai bine spus, cei care au puterea sa o faca) sa ne convinga ca ar fi incercat sa nu se abata de la aceste principii generale. Ma mult decat atat, gradul de degradare a lor este aproape total la nivelul legilor ordinare, acolo unde constitutia deja le alterase intr-un prim nivel spiritul.

Un sistem cu sclavie feroce infiltrata in relatiile de liber schimb de tip salarial este cel nord-american. Acesta se foloseste de abuzul asupra dreptului la sanatate (la viata) al angajatului prin crearea unor locuri de munca ce nu acopera asigurarea medicala. Desi SUA are cel mai performant sistem de sanatate din lume, totusi el nu functioneaza pentru toti cei care aduc contributii la dezvoltarea societatii. Frica de boala si de incapacitatea de a o trata din cauza lipsei de asigurari medicale face ca relatia de munca salariala in SUA sa fie foarte aproape de sclavia clasica, deja vestita pentru „ispravile” sale in aceasta tara. Nimic nu este mai odios decat un sistem de exploatare sociala care extrage entuziasmul si sanatatea din individ si care il lasa apoi sa moara ca un caine cand se imbolnaveste. In toata societatea contemporana „civilizata” surplusul de alimente este constant distrus. In aceeasi ordine de idei exista locuinte ce stau goale. In SUA fermierii sunt platiti sa nu produca. A nu oferi aceste bunuri membrilor comunitatii ce au nevoie acuta de ele este o crima. Cei ce ofera hrana persoanelor fara adapost risca de a fi amendati de politie sau chiar inchisi de justitie (!!??), dupa cum se vede in urmatorul video .


Iata cum sunt persecutati si arestati de autoritati niste oameni care nu doar ca nu fac nimic imoral, dar chiar fac niste gesturi esentialmente morale, definitorii pentru spiritul civilizat al umanitatii. Observand modul in care se comporta autoritatile in acest caz putem sa intelegem mai bine relatia dintre legislatie si morala. Astfel cred ca ne putem face si un tablou complet despre ce inseamna de fapt sclavia salariala in SUA si in intreaga lume.

In stadiul de persoana fara adapost poate ajunge si un membru al clasei de mijloc. Aceasta clasa are asigurat dreptul la locuinta doar atata timp cat isi plateste ratele la creditul imobiliar. Daca apar fluctuatii economice atunci el ajunge sa nu le mai poata plati si tot confortul lui se va fi dovedit ulterior a fi o imensa bula de sapun, o iluzie tipica pentru mitul pesterii. Iar fluctuatiile economice se fac de catre inginerii sociali conform unui foarte bine gandit plan de indobitocire prin manipularea generala a masei monetare, asa cum am aratat aici . Asa s-a intamplat cu economia occidentala incepand din 2007, unde retragerea de masa monetara si falimentele urmate au condus la ceea ce inselator s-a numit ulterior „criza imobiliara americana”. Aceasta formula este inselatoare pentru ca intentia ei a fost sa ascunda adevarata origine a crizei, respectiv refluxul monetar. Ea a fost menita sa arunce vina pe seama brokerilor (vezi filmul de propaganda „The big short”, nominalizat la Oscar in 2015) sau clientilor de credite care ar fi consumat mai mult decat puteau sa isi permita.

Desigur economia superperformanta nord-americana nu poate functiona fara aceasta sclavie salariala feroce. Tepile de pe sub poduri pentru a alunga persoanele fara adapost sunt practici care ne duc cu gandul la sulitele cu care se vanau sclavii fugari sau cu care se recrutau de la bun inceput. Nu stiu insa cat putem fi de mandri de penuria de produse cu standarde calitative inalte cu care ne inconjuram stiind ca unele dintre ele sunt create prin intermediul nenorocirii mentale provocate altora pentru a-i determina sa ne satisfaca ordinele.

Aceste drepturi fundamentale afirmate de Carta drepturilor omului au fost readuse in discutie in ultimul secol in dezbaterile contemporane. Dupa ce au fost consfintite de umanisti ele au fost aproape in acelasi moment retrase de cei care au avut acces la carmele societatii umane conform mai multor argumente. Intr-o sectiune urmatoare voi aduce mai multe argumente in favoarea recunoasterii acestor drepturi fundamentale ale omului.

Gabriel Baldovin

»»  read more

5. Abuzul asupra proprietatii prin amenintarile directe.

Asemanari si deosebiri intre sclavul clasic si muncitorul modern 5. Abuzul asupra proprietatii prin amenintarile directe.

English version here

Atat sistemul sclavagist clasic cat si sistemul social salarial contemporan abuzeaza constant proprietati fundamentale si moralmente nenegociabile ale victimelor sale transformate in servitori. Disconfortul creat celui abuzat nu este scop in sine ci doar mijloc menit spre a-l convinge sa urmeze anumite ordine in schimbul suspendarii lui temporare. Aceste ordine erau date de cei ce in trecut se numeau stapani si care in prezent se numesc patroni, manageri sau lideri. Daca servitorul urmeaza aceste ordine, atunci proprietatea sa fundamentala si moralmente nenegociabila este recunoscuta. Dar daca el refuza sa le urmeze, atunci ii este incalcata, abuzata. Remarcam aici decriminalizarea terminologica a noului sclavagism: ideea stapanului atotputernic, copie (pamanteasca) a lui Dumnezeu (sau altor zei) a fost inlocuita cu cea a antreprenorului caruia i se iarta crimele sclavagiste in schimbul impartirii cu ceilalti a profitului scos de pe urma exploatarii muncii servitorului.

In sclavia clasica se incalcau doar doua astfel de proprietati fundamentale si moralmente nenegociabile. Prima era dreptul la viata si integritate corporala iar cealalta era dreptul la orice fel de proprietate privata a sclavului. Cea de-a doua nu era niciodata recunoscuta. Prima era recunoscuta doar daca sclavul executa ordinele. In sistemul salarial contemporan aceste drepturi sunt recunoscute oarecum formal si partial pentru servitorii moderni. Insa, la fel ca si in cazul societatii clasice, ele au ramas recunoscute total pentru cei ce dau aceste ordine.

In ciuda multitudinii de obiecte cu care omul contemporan se inconjoara, exista 3 mari proprietati fundamentale si nenegociabile din punct de vedere moral care se incalca. Prima este insasi sanatatea, a doua este adapostul si a treia este hrana. O sa le analizez pe fiecare in parte. Sanatatea este constant atacata de poluarea contemporana, atat psihica cat si chimica. Poluarea psihica este rezultatul influentei negative a stresului asupra mintii omenesti. Stresul este o camuflare a amenintarilor specifice sclaviei clasice in relatii de aparent liber schimb. Amenintarile directe asupra vietii si integritatii corporale specifice sclaviei clasice au fost inlocuite cu stresul modern. Observam aici o scamatorie de ascundere a abuzurilor sclaviei clasice in forma stresului modern si nu o renuntare la ele. Rolul acestei camuflari este protectia originii acestor amenintari. Iar la originea acestor abuzuri s-au aflat si inca se afla, desigur, stapani, profitorii de pe urma lor. Ele il „conving” atat pe sclavul clasic cat si pe muncitorul modern sa le urmeze ordinele, adica sa se supuna si sa serveasca. Diferenta dintre amenintarile sclaviei clasice si stresul modern consta in interpunerea de factori secundari in relatia dintre cel ce da ordine si cel ce le executa. Acesti factori indeplinesc rolul de scut pentru o eventuala revolta a celor abuzati asupra profitorilor.

Dupa cum amenintarile specifice sclaviei clasice implicau pedeapsa cu moartea, in acelasi fel si stresul conduce la moarte. Diferenta dintre cele doua tipuri de amenintari consta in timpul survenirii mortii. Amenintarea clasica o pune in practica imediat in timp ce moartea datorata stresului survine pe termen lung. Camuflarea a functionat perfect: nimeni nu mai stie ce stresuri a avut decedatul de o boala sau alta. Familia sa nu poate identifica pe cel responsabil de stresarea defunctului in trecut pentru a-l trage la raspundere pentru boala lui letala. Iar stapanul a ramas cu profitul. Dimpotriva, in sclavia clasica, urmasii sau prietenii celui ucis (pentru ca a fugit de la locul de munca sau pentru ca nu muncea suficient de bine) pot pastra in minte aceasta crima si se pot razbuna mai devreme sau mai tarziu. Medicina psihosomatica a apucat sa faca legatura intre stres si boli precum cancerul, diabetul, sau infarctul. Din pacate, in ultimii 50 de ani ea a fost sugrumata de la dezvoltare, odata ce a fost banuita ca incurca interesele noilor stapani. Din fericire ea a apucat totusi sa precizeze aceste lucruri prin pionierii sai. Aceste informatii nu-au putut fi totusi eliminate insa noii stapani au avut grija sa impiedice cat mai multi potentiali servitori sa ajunga le ea, camufland-o cu ajutorul culturii consumiste care afirma exact opusul celor spuse de ea.

Apoi, poluarea chimica este produsa pe de o parte involuntar de diferitele substante care se pun in alimente pentru a le face mai rezistente la invechire, mai apetisante si mai dorite. Unele dintre ele au fost interzise atunci cand efectele lor maladive au ajuns foarte vizibile, devenind subiecte de presa. Din pacate sunt inca multe altele cu efecte similare pe termen lung, care inca nu si-au facut prezenta. Din acest motiv ele sunt insuficient cercetate. Desigur ele sunt aproape imposibil de identificat in acest moment.

Dar, pe de alta parte, in tarile cu grad mare de sclavie infiltrata in relatiile de liber schimb, se adauga cu buna stiinta substante nocive in alimente. Acest program de otravire sistematica a neproductivilor se practica in paralel cu punerea pe butuci a sistemului medical, asa cum au facut oligarhii care au controlat societatea in tarile fostului bloc comunist, dupa anii 1990. Ca toate practicile sclavagiste, nici acest lucru nu se face din rautate diabolica, ci cu detasarea specifica corporatistului cinic originara in nepasarea calmului clasic: „nimic personal, sunt doar afaceri”. Moartea servitorului este de fapt o pierdere pe care, desigur, profitorii stiu sa o evite. Interesul nu este moartea celui imbolnavit ci dependenta lui de sistemul medical. Scopul acestei dependente consta in profitul ulterior. Practica otravirii partiale a alimentelor are rolul de a-l face pe servitorul modern sa devina dependent de sistemul medical. Iar aceasta dependenta implica o recrutare in angrenajul economiei globale.

Sunt putine state care permit spitalizarea unei persoane care nu are asigurare medicala. Ea vine in urma slujirii sistemului si nu a independentei in obtinerea celor necesare traiului. Odata intrat in aceasta capcana, servitorul nu mai poate iesi din ea decat cu pretul imbolnavirii si eventual cu moartea. Amenintat cu moartea de catre boala, practic noul servitor se afla in aceeasi situatie precum sclavul clasic.

E adevarat ca medicina a progresat enorm in ultima suta de ani. Speranta de viata a omului civilizat a crescut fata de perioada epocii industriale a secolului al XIX-lea. Insa ea este inca mica daca o comparam cu un stil de viata traditional. Recordurile de longevitate apartin tocmai celor care au avut norocul sa nu fie atinsi de aceasta influenta malefica a „civilizatiei”. Medicina a putut adauga cateva decenii la batranetea omului contemporan insa acestea se platesc in tinerete cu „stagiul” de servitor. Regret sa constat ca in acest plan murdar al profitorilor contemporani sunt implicati, fara voia si stiinta multora dintre ei, si cei care presteaza cele mai morale servicii catre societate, respectiv medicii.

Iata cum amenintarea cu moartea se regaseste si in profitul realizat in urma unei relatii de asazis tip liber schimb. Mediul celui abuzat este initial influentat negativ, fapt ce il face incapabil sa negocieze echitabil acest schimb presupus liber. Ca si in cazul sclavului clasic, si muncitorul modern este nevoit sa accepte acele locuri de munca stresante, degradante sau umilitoare despre care am discutat mai sus.

Pe langa incalcarea dreptului la sanatate, sclavia moderna infiltrata in relatiile de liber schimb incalca si dreptul la locuinta si hrana decente. La fel ca si sclavia clasica, si in relatiile de fals liber schimb exista diferente radicale intre oameni. Sanatatea subreda poate fi mai greu depistata la prima vedere. Insa abuzul asupra dreptului la locuinta si hrana decente este poate cel mai important criteriu al infiltrarii sclaviei in relatiile de munca de tip contractual.

Din pacate, astazi amenintarea cu concedierea si aruncarea in strada este o practica comuna a corporatiilor pentru a stoarce ultimele picaturi de profit din oameni. Chiar si in tarile occidentale cu servicii sociale dintre cele mai avansate exista destule relatii de munca prelungita fata de diversi angajatori dar care nu asigura hrana si adapost decente. Un lucrator care este amenintat de catre sef cu aruncatul in strada, in conditiile in care nu a strans destula avere pentru a-si permite o retragere temporara mai lunga sau mai scurta de la aceasta activitate, sau o recalificare in alt domeniu, este un adevarat sclav salarial. Din nefericire, o astfel de practica este motorul economiei contemporane. Ea forteaza liberul arbitru al individului spre supunere si robie, la fel cum o facea amenintarea cu moartea in sclavia de sechestrare din perioada clasica despre care am discutat mai sus.

Acest articol se continuă aici:

Gabriel Baldovin

»»  read more

5. Abuzul asupra proprietatii prin amenintarile directe.

Asemanari si deosebiri intre sclavul clasic si muncitorul modern 5. Abuzul asupra proprietatii prin amenintarile directe.

English version here

Atat sistemul sclavagist clasic cat si sistemul social salarial contemporan abuzeaza constant proprietati fundamentale si moralmente nenegociabile ale victimelor sale transformate in servitori. Disconfortul creat celui abuzat nu este scop in sine ci doar mijloc menit spre a-l convinge sa urmeze anumite ordine in schimbul suspendarii lui temporare. Aceste ordine erau date de cei ce in trecut se numeau stapani si care in prezent se numesc patroni, manageri sau lideri. Daca servitorul urmeaza aceste ordine, atunci proprietatea sa fundamentala si moralmente nenegociabila este recunoscuta. Dar daca el refuza sa le urmeze, atunci ii este incalcata, abuzata. Remarcam aici decriminalizarea terminologica a noului sclavagism: ideea stapanului atotputernic, copie (pamanteasca) a lui Dumnezeu (sau altor zei) a fost inlocuita cu cea a antreprenorului caruia i se iarta crimele sclavagiste in schimbul impartirii cu ceilalti a profitului scos de pe urma exploatarii muncii servitorului.

In sclavia clasica se incalcau doar doua astfel de proprietati fundamentale si moralmente nenegociabile. Prima era dreptul la viata si integritate corporala iar cealalta era dreptul la orice fel de proprietate privata a sclavului. Cea de-a doua nu era niciodata recunoscuta. Prima era recunoscuta doar daca sclavul executa ordinele. In sistemul salarial contemporan aceste drepturi sunt recunoscute oarecum formal si partial pentru servitorii moderni. Insa, la fel ca si in cazul societatii clasice, ele au ramas recunoscute total pentru cei ce dau aceste ordine.

In ciuda multitudinii de obiecte cu care omul contemporan se inconjoara, exista 3 mari proprietati fundamentale si nenegociabile din punct de vedere moral care se incalca. Prima este insasi sanatatea, a doua este adapostul si a treia este hrana. O sa le analizez pe fiecare in parte. Sanatatea este constant atacata de poluarea contemporana, atat psihica cat si chimica. Poluarea psihica este rezultatul influentei negative a stresului asupra mintii omenesti. Stresul este o camuflare a amenintarilor specifice sclaviei clasice in relatii de aparent liber schimb. Amenintarile directe asupra vietii si integritatii corporale specifice sclaviei clasice au fost inlocuite cu stresul modern. Observam aici o scamatorie de ascundere a abuzurilor sclaviei clasice in forma stresului modern si nu o renuntare la ele. Rolul acestei camuflari este protectia originii acestor amenintari. Iar la originea acestor abuzuri s-au aflat si inca se afla, desigur, stapani, profitorii de pe urma lor. Ele il „conving” atat pe sclavul clasic cat si pe muncitorul modern sa le urmeze ordinele, adica sa se supuna si sa serveasca. Diferenta dintre amenintarile sclaviei clasice si stresul modern consta in interpunerea de factori secundari in relatia dintre cel ce da ordine si cel ce le executa. Acesti factori indeplinesc rolul de scut pentru o eventuala revolta a celor abuzati asupra profitorilor.

Dupa cum amenintarile specifice sclaviei clasice implicau pedeapsa cu moartea, in acelasi fel si stresul conduce la moarte. Diferenta dintre cele doua tipuri de amenintari consta in timpul survenirii mortii. Amenintarea clasica o pune in practica imediat in timp ce moartea datorata stresului survine pe termen lung. Camuflarea a functionat perfect: nimeni nu mai stie ce stresuri a avut decedatul de o boala sau alta. Familia sa nu poate identifica pe cel responsabil de stresarea defunctului in trecut pentru a-l trage la raspundere pentru boala lui letala. Iar stapanul a ramas cu profitul. Dimpotriva, in sclavia clasica, urmasii sau prietenii celui ucis (pentru ca a fugit de la locul de munca sau pentru ca nu muncea suficient de bine) pot pastra in minte aceasta crima si se pot razbuna mai devreme sau mai tarziu. Medicina psihosomatica a apucat sa faca legatura intre stres si boli precum cancerul, diabetul, sau infarctul. Din pacate, in ultimii 50 de ani ea a fost sugrumata de la dezvoltare, odata ce a fost banuita ca incurca interesele noilor stapani. Din fericire ea a apucat totusi sa precizeze aceste lucruri prin pionierii sai. Aceste informatii nu-au putut fi totusi eliminate insa noii stapani au avut grija sa impiedice cat mai multi potentiali servitori sa ajunga le ea, camufland-o cu ajutorul culturii consumiste care afirma exact opusul celor spuse de ea.

Apoi, poluarea chimica este produsa pe de o parte involuntar de diferitele substante care se pun in alimente pentru a le face mai rezistente la invechire, mai apetisante si mai dorite. Unele dintre ele au fost interzise atunci cand efectele lor maladive au ajuns foarte vizibile, devenind subiecte de presa. Din pacate sunt inca multe altele cu efecte similare pe termen lung, care inca nu si-au facut prezenta. Din acest motiv ele sunt insuficient cercetate. Desigur ele sunt aproape imposibil de identificat in acest moment.

Dar, pe de alta parte, in tarile cu grad mare de sclavie infiltrata in relatiile de liber schimb, se adauga cu buna stiinta substante nocive in alimente. Acest program de otravire sistematica a neproductivilor se practica in paralel cu punerea pe butuci a sistemului medical, asa cum au facut oligarhii care au controlat societatea in tarile fostului bloc comunist, dupa anii 1990. Ca toate practicile sclavagiste, nici acest lucru nu se face din rautate diabolica, ci cu detasarea specifica corporatistului cinic originara in nepasarea calmului clasic: „nimic personal, sunt doar afaceri”. Moartea servitorului este de fapt o pierdere pe care, desigur, profitorii stiu sa o evite. Interesul nu este moartea celui imbolnavit ci dependenta lui de sistemul medical. Scopul acestei dependente consta in profitul ulterior. Practica otravirii partiale a alimentelor are rolul de a-l face pe servitorul modern sa devina dependent de sistemul medical. Iar aceasta dependenta implica o recrutare in angrenajul economiei globale.

Sunt putine state care permit spitalizarea unei persoane care nu are asigurare medicala. Ea vine in urma slujirii sistemului si nu a independentei in obtinerea celor necesare traiului. Odata intrat in aceasta capcana, servitorul nu mai poate iesi din ea decat cu pretul imbolnavirii si eventual cu moartea. Amenintat cu moartea de catre boala, practic noul servitor se afla in aceeasi situatie precum sclavul clasic.

E adevarat ca medicina a progresat enorm in ultima suta de ani. Speranta de viata a omului civilizat a crescut fata de perioada epocii industriale a secolului al XIX-lea. Insa ea este inca mica daca o comparam cu un stil de viata traditional. Recordurile de longevitate apartin tocmai celor care au avut norocul sa nu fie atinsi de aceasta influenta malefica a „civilizatiei”. Medicina a putut adauga cateva decenii la batranetea omului contemporan insa acestea se platesc in tinerete cu „stagiul” de servitor. Regret sa constat ca in acest plan murdar al profitorilor contemporani sunt implicati, fara voia si stiinta multora dintre ei, si cei care presteaza cele mai morale servicii catre societate, respectiv medicii.

Iata cum amenintarea cu moartea se regaseste si in profitul realizat in urma unei relatii de asazis tip liber schimb. Mediul celui abuzat este initial influentat negativ, fapt ce il face incapabil sa negocieze echitabil acest schimb presupus liber. Ca si in cazul sclavului clasic, si muncitorul modern este nevoit sa accepte acele locuri de munca stresante, degradante sau umilitoare despre care am discutat mai sus.

Pe langa incalcarea dreptului la sanatate, sclavia moderna infiltrata in relatiile de liber schimb incalca si dreptul la locuinta si hrana decente. La fel ca si sclavia clasica, si in relatiile de fals liber schimb exista diferente radicale intre oameni. Sanatatea subreda poate fi mai greu depistata la prima vedere. Insa abuzul asupra dreptului la locuinta si hrana decente este poate cel mai important criteriu al infiltrarii sclaviei in relatiile de munca de tip contractual.

Din pacate, astazi amenintarea cu concedierea si aruncarea in strada este o practica comuna a corporatiilor pentru a stoarce ultimele picaturi de profit din oameni. Chiar si in tarile occidentale cu servicii sociale dintre cele mai avansate exista destule relatii de munca prelungita fata de diversi angajatori dar care nu asigura hrana si adapost decente. Un lucrator care este amenintat de catre sef cu aruncatul in strada, in conditiile in care nu a strans destula avere pentru a-si permite o retragere temporara mai lunga sau mai scurta de la aceasta activitate, sau o recalificare in alt domeniu, este un adevarat sclav salarial. Din nefericire, o astfel de practica este motorul economiei contemporane. Ea forteaza liberul arbitru al individului spre supunere si robie, la fel cum o facea amenintarea cu moartea in sclavia de sechestrare din perioada clasica despre care am discutat mai sus.

Acest articol se continuă aici:

Gabriel Baldovin

»»  read more

4. Examples of slavery infiltrated free trade relations

The similarities and differences between the classical slave and modern laborer 4. Examples of slavery infiltrated free trade relations

This entry continues the precedent one

Pentru varianta in limba romana clic aici

A fair society turns available services back to turn to those who offer a certain service. That means that those who benefit from someone’s service must provide on their turn something in return. If a person does not offer anything to society and only takes advantage form somebody else’s work then the society is a slavery-based one. Neither the false "illusory" or already possessed goods exchange above, such as keeping its life or immortality promise, for example, is not a fair exchange, but a classic sign of slavery. I have shown in the previous sections that there are false free trade relationships that allow the same classical slavery type of profit. This is undeserved profit and comes from an abuse. If this is a total abuse then there is a typical classical slavery relationship. If the abuse is only partial then there is an infiltrated slavery into free trade relationship, which is a embellished slavery into some kind of free trade appearance.

Every major contemporary economical powers found their "greatness" into these fake relationship abuses that generate undeserved profit. It is a long story about how human society has turned from classical slavery to this kind of modern infiltrated slavery into free trade relationship which I mentioned in some older articles and to which I will return in the next ones for more clarifications. Until then I will give some examples of such labour relationships.

It is not very difficult to identify those who are not sufficiently rewarded for various services to society. Those low quality jobs make them very unpopular, which often involves attracting immigrants to be made. The plumbers, the garbage collectors, the fruit and vegetable pickers and the other agriculture workers jobs, are in fact insufficiently appreciated by the communities. Although they are humiliating and reflect a low social status, immigrants prefer these jobs instead of those of work or social and environmental conditions in which they have lived before emigration. Unfortunately, recently, the western corporations pull the governmental strings to artificially create such imbalances in the world’s marginal areas and produce emigrants as second-class citizens and used as living tools. I have shown in detail here disadvantages of economic migration here .

A garbage collector that provides indispensable services for the whole community, although lives its life back home also in garbage because can’t afford a decent living, is one such person. It deserves a higher wage according to its work importance. The offered wage by the community is more a classic slavery concealment than an honest exchange on which the company makes for its services. A garbage collector does not rich even the 30% benefit from those whom it makes services to. Of course, his is allowed to live in the community space just as much as the classical slave was permitted to actually live in return for its services ... By denying access to the other society members services benefits this person legitimate rights are basically denied.

These people marginalization and false promise of attaining the full rights citizen status is paradoxically the key to keep them in such a position, as I will show that in details in the following sections. It is noticeable that the main difference between this type of low waged labor and the classical slavery labor relationship lays in replacing the traditional threats (with death, beating and so on) with various lies (of social ascension promise, eternal happiness and so on). In reality, after their excitement and their life will be consumed, these people will become even more marginalized and some of them even thrown out in the street. The US and China police takes care to "clean" some more of these people so to make room for others as naïve as the disappointed ones were when first arrived in the city of dreams. At the slightest mistake, those countries police would kill in cold blood these depressed people, under the coverage of a possible initial assault that had to fight against. In fact, the neo slavery system really operates here a kind of "social selection" that shadows Hitler as an amateur in social Darwinism. The similarity between police eugenic task and the punishment to the runaway classical slave is obvious.

The presence of migrants who provide services spaces below Western culture accepted human dignity has two major implications. Firstly, the main individual becomes dependent by these low dignity labor and therefore is obliged to accept the social exploitation system due to the comfort it brings. If emigrants would leave, the common people would shortly wake up with streets full of garbage, with higher prices for fruits and vegetable, with more discomfort related to domestic repairs, with decreased efficiency of public services and so on. Although it has a permanent criticism attitude towards the system and politicians, the native people paradoxically supports it exactly in the most critical area. Then, the immigrants pressure on locals to become more efficient by taking their jobs, which attracts the hostility and the disregard towards them, and deepens their sense of marginalization. I will show in detail the antisocial implications of this situation in one of the following sections.

The contemporary technology can replace those humbling jobs but there is a top state political interest for keeping these people in the dark and to perpetuate their availability to serve in future situations. Therefore any relief in their life or rising up their dignity is discreetly undermined. The Asian areas there are specialized jobs for disassembling and selecting various parts of trash thrown household or cars. It is immoral to send this waste to be disassembled there but not to invest in an automatic line to make these people’s lives easier. The electric car is an example of restraint in social evolution according to the current technology. Many such jobs in the "civilized world" are actually traps to keep people in a state of underdevelopment and spiritual retardation. They will bring profit in the future either directly or indirectly through their descendants, so that such macrosocial actions have a well defined intention.

Above the marginal social low class members there are marginalized middle class who are drunk with the illusion of social superiority. They are the central pillar of the consumer society. Although belonging to majority, they have also a marginal status; if they refuse to continue on the same path, then they too will find themselves thrown into the street as low class marginalized ones. The only difference between the two classes is that the middle class ones are well paid. Some of them are very well paid, but not well enough to waste their lives and become workaholics. The money and the illusory satisfaction of apparent luxury are actually the chains that hold them in these hard working positions. They are morally anesthetized by the high social hierarchy ideals achieving. The Cave Myth has a financial allure in the modern era. These people’s labor is very stressful and time consuming. There are a lot of such free slaves who work more than 8 hours a day, instead of socializing with family and loved ones. Therefore they either do not socialize at all or only poorly socialize inside community. Their family members’ relationship is unhealthy. They are simply marginal people isolated in more or less hermetic spaces. To counteract this handicap they pay to be accepted in specific communities or social circles. Basically, the same thing happened in the past centuries when the classical slave had to pay its right to be accepted in the community as a living person. Here's another similarity bettween this so called free labor relationship and the classical slavery!



A small or average remuneration for extremely stressful services is a sign of slavery infiltrated into free work relations between people. I can list here, for example, the labor made by the public transportation drivers, buildings construction labors and other dangerous activities or the high risk labors, either because they must be done very carefully, or because they involve various dangers for the worker or for the community. These jobs must be remunerated so that the ones who made them at some point would be able to live decently after quitting. A stressful job is unhealthy and corrosive for the mind that eventually will convert into the huge spectrum of somatic diseases known today, among which are the most lethal ones like the cancer, the diabetes and the heart attack. I would insist on this subject in one of the following sections.

In the next section I will detail how the system has developed this type of social relations in which is infiltrated the free trade slavery.

Gabriel Baldovin

»»  read more

4. Examples of slavery infiltrated free trade relations

The similarities and differences between the classical slave and modern laborer 4. Examples of slavery infiltrated free trade relations

This entry continues the the precedent one

Pentru varianta in limba romana clic aici

A fair society turns available services back to turn to those who offer a certain service. That means that those who benefit from someone’s service must provide on their turn something in return. If a person does not offer anything to society and only takes advantage form somebody else’s work then the society is a slavery-based one. Neither the false "illusory" or already possessed goods exchange above, such as keeping its life or immortality promise, for example, is not a fair exchange, but a classic sign of slavery. I have shown in the previous sections that there are false free trade relationships that allow the same classical slavery type of profit. This is undeserved profit and comes from an abuse. If this is a total abuse then there is a typical classical slavery relationship. If the abuse is only partial then there is an infiltrated slavery into free trade relationship, which is a embellished slavery into some kind of free trade appearance.

Every major contemporary economical powers found their "greatness" into these fake relationship abuses that generate undeserved profit. It is a long story about how human society has turned from classical slavery to this kind of modern infiltrated slavery into free trade relationship which I mentioned in some older articles and to which I will return in the next ones for more clarifications. Until then I will give some examples of such labour relationships.

It is not very difficult to identify those who are not sufficiently rewarded for various services to society. Those low quality jobs make them very unpopular, which often involves attracting immigrants to be made. The plumbers, the garbage collectors, the fruit and vegetable pickers and the other agriculture workers jobs, are in fact insufficiently appreciated by the communities. Although they are humiliating and reflect a low social status, immigrants prefer these jobs instead of those of work or social and environmental conditions in which they have lived before emigration. Unfortunately, recently, the western corporations pull the governmental strings to artificially create such imbalances in the world’s marginal areas and produce emigrants as second-class citizens and used as living tools. I have shown in detail here disadvantages of economic migration here .

A garbage collector that provides indispensable services for the whole community, although lives its life back home also in garbage because can’t afford a decent living, is one such person. It deserves a higher wage according to its work importance. The offered wage by the community is more a classic slavery concealment than an honest exchange on which the company makes for its services. A garbage collector does not rich even the 30% benefit from those whom it makes services to. Of course, his is allowed to live in the community space just as much as the classical slave was permitted to actually live in return for its services ... By denying access to the other society members services benefits this person legitimate rights are basically denied.

These people marginalization and false promise of attaining the full rights citizen status is paradoxically the key to keep them in such a position, as I will show that in details in the following sections. It is noticeable that the main difference between this type of low waged labor and the classical slavery labor relationship lays in replacing the traditional threats (with death, beating and so on) with various lies (of social ascension promise, eternal happiness and so on). In reality, after their excitement and their life will be consumed, these people will become even more marginalized and some of them even thrown out in the street. The US and China police takes care to "clean" some more of these people so to make room for others as naïve as the disappointed ones were when first arrived in the city of dreams. At the slightest mistake, those countries police would kill in cold blood these depressed people, under the coverage of a possible initial assault that had to fight against. In fact, the neo slavery system really operates here a kind of "social selection" that shadows Hitler as an amateur in social Darwinism. The similarity between police eugenic task and the punishment to the runaway classical slave is obvious.

The presence of migrants who provide services spaces below Western culture accepted human dignity has two major implications. Firstly, the main individual becomes dependent by these low dignity labor and therefore is obliged to accept the social exploitation system due to the comfort it brings. If emigrants would leave, the common people would shortly wake up with streets full of garbage, with higher prices for fruits and vegetable, with more discomfort related to domestic repairs, with decreased efficiency of public services and so on. Although it has a permanent criticism attitude towards the system and politicians, the native people paradoxically supports it exactly in the most critical area. Then, the immigrants pressure on locals to become more efficient by taking their jobs, which attracts the hostility and the disregard towards them, and deepens their sense of marginalization. I will show in detail the antisocial implications of this situation in one of the following sections.

The contemporary technology can replace those humbling jobs but there is a top state political interest for keeping these people in the dark and to perpetuate their availability to serve in future situations. Therefore any relief in their life or rising up their dignity is discreetly undermined. The Asian areas there are specialized jobs for disassembling and selecting various parts of trash thrown household or cars. It is immoral to send this waste to be disassembled there but not to invest in an automatic line to make these people’s lives easier. The electric car is an example of restraint in social evolution according to the current technology. Many such jobs in the "civilized world" are actually traps to keep people in a state of underdevelopment and spiritual retardation. They will bring profit in the future either directly or indirectly through their descendants, so that such macrosocial actions have a well defined intention.

Above the marginal social low class members there are marginalized middle class who are drunk with the illusion of social superiority. They are the central pillar of the consumer society. Although belonging to majority, they have also a marginal status; if they refuse to continue on the same path, then they too will find themselves thrown into the street as low class marginalized ones. The only difference between the two classes is that the middle class ones are well paid. Some of them are very well paid, but not well enough to waste their lives and become workaholics. The money and the illusory satisfaction of apparent luxury are actually the chains that hold them in these hard working positions. They are morally anesthetized by the high social hierarchy ideals achieving. The Cave Myth has a financial allure in the modern era. These people’s labor is very stressful and time consuming. There are a lot of such free slaves who work more than 8 hours a day, instead of socializing with family and loved ones. Therefore they either do not socialize at all or only poorly socialize inside community. Their family members’ relationship is unhealthy. They are simply marginal people isolated in more or less hermetic spaces. To counteract this handicap they pay to be accepted in specific communities or social circles. Basically, the same thing happened in the past centuries when the classical slave had to pay its right to be accepted in the community as a living person. Here's another similarity bettween this so called free labor relationship and the classical slavery!



A small or average remuneration for extremely stressful services is a sign of slavery infiltrated into free work relations between people. I can list here, for example, the labor made by the public transportation drivers, buildings construction labors and other dangerous activities or the high risk labors, either because they must be done very carefully, or because they involve various dangers for the worker or for the community. These jobs must be remunerated so that the ones who made them at some point would be able to live decently after quitting. A stressful job is unhealthy and corrosive for the mind that eventually will convert into the huge spectrum of somatic diseases known today, among which are the most lethal ones like the cancer, the diabetes and the heart attack. I would insist on this subject in one of the following sections.

In the next section I will detail how the system has developed this type of social relations in which is infiltrated the free trade slavery.

Gabriel Baldovin

»»  read more

4. Exemple de sclavie infiltrata in relatiile de liber schimb

Asemanari si deosebiri intre sclavul clasic si muncitorul modern 4. Exemple de sclavie infiltrata in relatiile de liber schimb

English version here

O societate echitabila intoarce serviciile de care dispune la randul ei catre acel om care ii ofera un serviciu oarecare. Asta inseamna ca cei care beneficiaza de pe urma serviciului cuiva trebuie sa ii ofere la randul lor ceva la schimb. Daca nu ofera nimic si doar profita de rezultatul muncii lui, atunci societatea este una inca sclavagista. Nici presupusul schimb cu bunuri „iluzorii” sau cu cele deja posedate anterior, cum este promisiunea nemuririi sau pastrarea vietii, de exemplu, nu este un schimb corect, ci un semn al sclaviei clasice. Am aratat in sectiunile precedente faptul ca exista relatii de fals liber schimb care permit acelasi tip de profit tipic sclaviei clasice. Acest profit este unul nemeritat si reiese dintr-un abuz. Daca acest abuz este total atunci relatia este de sclavie clasica. Daca el este partial atunci relatia este de sclavagism infiltrat in relatia de liber schimb, adica un sclavagism mai cosmetizat cu aspect de liber schimb.

Toate marile puteri economice contemporane isi au „maretia” in aceste abuzuri ale relatiei de fals liber schimb generatoare de profit nemeritat. Este o poveste mai lunga despre cum societatea umana a trecut de la sclavia clasica la acest tip de sclavie infiltrata in relatii de liber schimb despre care am mai amintit in unele articole mai vechi si la care voi reveni in urmatoarele cu mai multe precizari. Pana atunci insa am sa ofer cateva exemple de astfel de relatii de munca.

Nu e foarte greu de identificat cei care nu sunt suficient de bine recompensati pentru servicii diverse aduse societatii. Calitatea redusa a muncilor din aceasta categorie le face nepopulare, ceea ce, de multe ori implica atragerea de emigranti pentru a fi facute. Muncile de instalatori, gunoieri, culegatori de fructe si legume si alti muncitori in agricultura, sunt de fapt activitati insuficient apreciate de comunitate. Desi sunt umilitoare si reflecta un statut social scazut, pentru emigranti ele sunt preferabile fata de muncile sau conditiile sociale si de mediu din care au plecat. Din pacate, recent, corporatiile trag sforile guvernamentale pentru a crea in mod artificial astfel de dezechilibre in zonele marginale ale lumii si a produce emigranti pe post de cetateni de mana a doua pe post de unelte vi. Am aratat in detaliu aici dezavantajele migratiei economice aici.

Un gunoier care face o treaba necesara intregii comunitati, si care isi traieste viata de acasa tot printre gunoaie pentru ca nu-si poate permite cele necesare unui trai decent, este un astfel de om. El merita o retributie mai mare conform cu importanta muncii depuse. Salariul oferit de catre comunitate este mai mult o ascundere a sclaviei clasice decat un schimb onest pe care societatea il ofera pentru serviciile sale. Un gunoier nu beneficiaza nici de 30% de pe urma celor carora el le face servicii. Desigur, lui ii este permis sa locuiasca in spatiul in care isi desfasoara activitatea cam la fel cum sclavului clasic ii era permis sa traiasca in schimbul serviciilor sale… Prin negarea accesului la beneficiile altor membri ai societatii practic acestui om i se neaga aceste drepturi legitime.

Marginalizarea acestor oameni si promisiunea mincinoasa de accedere la statutul cu cetatean cu drepturi depline este in mod paradoxal cheia pastrarii lor in astfel de pozitii umilitoare, dupa cum voi arata in sectiunile urmatoare. Sesizam ca principala diferenta dintre acest tip de relatie salariala de munca si cea sclavia clasica este inlocuirea amenintarii (cu moartea sau bataia) cu minciuna (promisiunii de ascensiune sociala sau fericirea eterna). In realitate, dupa ce entuziasmul si viata li se va fi consumat, acesti oameni vor deveni si mai marginalizati, in caz ca nu sunt aruncati direct in strada. In tari ca SUA si China politia are grija sa mai „curete” din acesti oameni pentru a face locul altora noi, la fel de naivi precum erau la inceput cei ajunsi in prezent dezamagiti. La cea mai mica greseala, politia din aceste state ii ucide cu sange rece pe acesti deprimati, pretextand o eventuala agresiune initiala a acestora. De fapt sistemul neosclavagist opereaza aici un fel de „selectie sociala” care il arata pe Hitler ca pe un amator in darwinism social. Observam si in acest caz asemanarea activitatii eugenice a politiei cu cea a pedepsei data sclavului clasic fugar.

Prezenta emigrantilor ce presteaza munci sub demnitatea umana acceptata in spatiile occidentale are doua implicatii majore. Mai intai, omul de rand devine dependent de rezultatul acestor munci si, prin urmare, este obligat sa accepte sistemul in virtutea obisnuintei. Daca emigrantii ar pleca, s-ar trezi pe termen scurt cu strazile pline de gunoi, cu un pret mai mare la fructe, cu disconfort mai mare legat de anumite reparatii domestice, cu scaderea eficientei serviciilor publice etc. Desi are atitudine permanent critica la adresa sistemului, localnicul este parte activa din el sustinandu-l exact in zona sa cea mai problematica. Apoi, facand presiune asupra localnicilor spre a deveni mai eficienti pentru a nu fi inlocuiti, imigrantii atrag ostilitatea si desconsiderarea acestora, ceea ce le adanceste sentimentul de marginalizare. Despre implicatiile antisociale ale acestei situatii voi detalia intr-unul dintre sectiunile urmatoare.

Tehnologia contemporana poate permite inlocuirea acestor joburi umilitoare insa in varful societatii exista interes pentru pastrarea acestor oameni in intuneric si pentru perpetuarea profitarii de pe urma disponibilitatii lor de a servi in viitoare contexte. De aceea orice fel de usurare a vietii sau de recunoastere a demnitatii lor este discret subminata. In zonele asiatice exista locuri de munca specializate in dezasamblarea si selectarea elementelor diferitelor obiecte de uz casnic sau masini aruncate la gunoi. Este imoral sa trimiti aceste deseuri spre dezasamblare acolo dar sa nu investesti ceva intr-o linie automatica pentru a le face viata mai usoara acestor oameni. Masina electrica este un exemplu de infranare a evolutiei sociale conform cu nivelul tehnologiei actuale. Multe astfel de joburi din „lumea civilizata” sunt de fapt capcane pentru a-i tine in stare de subdezvoltare si retardare spirituala pe unii oameni. Ei vor aduce in viitor profit insa, fie direct fie indirect prin urmasii lor, asa ca astfel de actiuni macrosociale au un sens foarte bine calculat.

Deasupra marginalilor inferiori de la baza piramidei sociale exista marginalii clasei de mijloc care sunt imbatati de iluzia superioritatii sociale. Ei sunt pilonul central al societatii de consum. Desi sunt majoritari, ei au tot un statut marginal; daca refuza sa continue pe acelasi drum, si ei se vor trezi aruncati in strada la fel ca si marginalii inferiori. Spre deosebire de acestia, cei mediani sunt bine platiti. Unii sunt foarte bine platiti, insa nu atat de bine incat sa isi iroseasca viata in munca. Banii si fitele satisfacute cu ei sunt de fapt chingile care-i tin in aceste pozitii. Idealurile lor de marire sociala ii face un fel de anesteziati moral. Mitul pesterii are alura financiara in epoca moderna. Munca acestor oameni este foarte stresanta sau consumatoare de timp. Sunt foarte multii astfel de adevarati sclavi liberi care muncesc mai mult de 8 ore pe zi, in detrimentul socializarii cu familia si apropiatii. Din aceasta cauza ei fie nu socializeaza deloc, fie socializeaza prost cu semenii. Relatia cu membrii familiei este una nesanatoasa. Ei sunt niste marginali, izolati in spatii mai mult sau mai putin ermetice. Ca sa contracareze acest handicap ei platesc pentru a fi acceptati in diferite comunitati sau cercuri sociale. Practic, in acelasi fel in secolele trecute sclavul clasic isi platea dreptul de a fi acceptat in comunitate ca om liber. Iata o alta asemanare a relatiei libere de munca cu sclavia clasica!


O retributie mica sau medie pentru servicii extrem de stresante, este un semn al sclavagismului infiltrat in relatiile liber consimtite dintre oameni. Pot enumera aici, de exemplu, muncile de conducator de mijloace de transport in comun, muncile de constructori si alte activitati periculoase, sau lucrator in unitati cu activitati de risc inalt, fie pentru ca trebuie facute foarte minutios, fie pentru ca implica diverse pericole pentru sine sau comunitate. Aceste munci trebuie sa fie retribuite in asa fel incat cel ce le-a facut la un moment dat sa poata sa traiasca decent dupa ce nu le mai face. O munca stresanta este o munca nesanatoasa, coroziva pentru psihic si, ulterior convertibila in spectrul urias de boli somatice cunoscute astazi, dintre care, cele mai letale sunt cancerul, diabetul si infarctul. O sa insist pe aceasta tema intr-unul dintre sectiunile urmatoare.

In urmatoarea sectiune voi detalia modul in care sistemul social a dezvoltat acest tip de relatii de liber schimb in care este infiltrata sclavia.

Gabriel Baldovin

»»  read more

3. The false free trading relationship

The similarities and differences between classical slave and modern worker 3. The false free trading relationship.

Pentru varianta in limba romana clic aici  

This entry continues the precedent one

The more or less symbolic retribution that the modern worker gets from the employer for its work is clearly distinguishable by the based lack of a free exchange relationship that is specific to the classical slavery. Yet even here the difference is not too big because we know that the most effective slaves were those days encouraged like as today with special "gifts". Likewise the slave mistresses had greater privileges than other female slaves, much like today... The daily or longer periods free time (paid vacations) and the possibility of resignation are other elements to differentiate between classical slavery and the modern employee status.

Retributia neechitabila este un alt punct comun intre anumite relatii moderne de munca si sclavia clasica. Sclavul clasic nu era platit decat cu cele necesare unei minime existente. Daca retributia primita in schimbul muncii sale este doar hrana si adapostul, fara posibilitate de diversificare a satisfactiilor si cu discriminari sociale profunde, atunci sclavia este una clasica. Dimpotriva, relatiile libere de munca permit o clara diversificare a implinirii nevoilor vietii cotidiene. Insa daca retributia este prea mica, neconforma cu valoarea mai mare a muncii depuse, atunci muncitorul modern este practic la fel de neretribuit ca si sclavul clasic.

The unfair retribution is another common point among certain modern work relations and the classical slavery. The classical slave was paid only with the minimum necessary for existence. If the remuneration received in return for its labors is food and shelter only, without the satisfactions diversifying possibility and with major social discrimination, then the slavery is a classical one. In contrast, the free work relations from allow a clear diversification fulfillment for the everyday life needs. But if the fee is too low, smaller than the labor value, then the modern worker is practically as unpaid as the classical slave.

Here is a trick made under the shape of free trade between pay and labor, by giving the worker a symbolic retribution just for making some kind of differentiation from slave free classical slave. There is an employer interest in camouflaging this crime in a respectable sheath in order to avoid the periodical typical slave uprising, but also to obtain support from the public if blood drowning such a potential rebellion. When the retribution for labor exchange is inconsistent with the free market (meaning that it should not be influenced by manipulation and other social engineering maneuvers), that is genuine slavery. The slavery degree infiltrated in these free work relationships is directly proportional to the discrepancy between the actual labor value that one person makes and the value that evaluated by its recipient.

This type of relationship can be called false free trade slavery as the work offered is not sufficiently fair paid by the one who benefit from it, just like in the case of classical slavery. This type of slavery has been developed especially by sellers. The bourgeois mentality of the eighteenth and nineteenth century continued in the contemporary business mentality, replacing feudal classical slavery. For example, if such a seller convinces or forces through various means a citizen to buy some functional object at up to a 1,000 times higher value than the real market, this is a 999/1000 scam. 1/1000 is the exact ratio between the actual value of the exchange item and the work that is not covered by this exchange. The difference between the product received value and the product given value in this exchange relationship is a full-fledged theft.

If the good offered in this exchange to such a trader is another object, then the exchange relationship is a scam. If this exchange involves some services, possibly in the long term, then this is a sign of slavery infiltrated inside the remunerated employment relationship. The retribution is then only a specific trade hoax that can be detected or not. Unfortunately, in modern society there are special designed institutions of mystification and elevation to the religion rank value for items or services in order to enslave those who are caught in their spells.

It should be categorically pointed out here however that not any profit is equivalent to slavery. Not all the profit situations are immoral. Imagine an inventor who facilitates the life and work for the whole community or society after its invention. Such activity increases the standard of living for all those involved in its implementation as for all the community or society members. If the inventor makes profit from the sale of the product, according to community members’ free trade and without market manipulation, then it is gained on merit. Here it is really a win-win situation where everyone benefits from this innovative product. The society has to reward this emblematic figure. It really should encourage this kind of fair profit and to invest in training these people under the human civilization natural interest to evolution. For example, Bill Gates deserves his social status thanks to the innovations that the company he created has made in society, with profound changes in all our lives. This text could not be read without the social revolution made by his team and the rival teams. It remains of course debatable whether he was fair in some practices regarding his employees, but he has not created the system, he just took it as found.

Karl Marx identified the profit with the social exploitation. From his point of view, the profit is achieved by the fact that the worker is remunerated less than deserved, as the employer gains more profit through what he called "surplus value". As it turns out, he was right in the case of the profit that is excessive, unfairly and with no living standards rising for those involved in it. But he was wrong when considered that any kind of profit is immoral. Of course, Marx was influenced by the naive and poorly documented JJ Rousseau's ideas about the primitive society beauty that seems to be egalitarian. From this ideal, he developed the theory of communist equality for all citizens, as idealistic as that that Rousseau imagined. But later, the cultural anthropology very clearly showed that there is very visible social stratification in primitive societies, determined either on cultural criteria (totem) or based on personal abilities, as in every community or society. Most advanced animals’ species have higher or lower differences between their members. The more genetically advanced members take their species on higher status. The profit as the social classes differences on the skills, capacity and other basis, is a natural fact. Of course, it remains debatable whether the economic activities profit is enough to become a general criterion of human values, but this is another discussion topic.

At the opposite pole from that of Bill Gates, exemplified above, there is George Soros. He dose not deserve the rich man's status in contemporary society. He only speculated the market and immorally enriched without innovating or inventing something that would have changed the people’s lives. Unfortunately, the contemporary society is suffocated by these people that unjustly got rich. Any such false innovation or social engineering, which involves civil liberties or living standards loss, is a sign for hidden slavery in free trade relations. Then, the living standards collapsing are explained by politicians through various stratagems that persuade citizens to accept, and thus their corporations and intelligence services governed caste obtain the slavery type profit. For example, the Iraqi war and the bad loans artificial granting by banks to potential bad debtors are modern slavery practices. These practices served for citizens’ deceiving with false explanation in order to cover up this kind of phenomenon: . that modern slavery usually uses. Moreover, the non ecological environment exploitation by cutting down forests, or fracking, that pollutes the waters, are examples of economic maneuvers that do not lead to the whole community rising living standards but, on the contrary, they lead to their decline. These social engineering actions are identical to that of water privatization, which I have mentioned above, and they are genuine modern slavery practices.

The surplus value theory was later justly rejected by many philosophers and sociologists. Here is not the time for showing their objections. But Marx was right when analyzed the exaggerate discrepancy between rich and poor. Such differences are caused by the specific modern slavery market manipulation. The existence of such rich people like George Soros falsely implies the existence and the poor unfairly. These rich wrongly speculated just social system to reach the position where they are without the company brought some improvement. Their status as social cheaters has the other extreme recoil, namely those who do not receive from society what they ought.

Unfortunately, quite often the profit is equitably divided between the other community members in general or those who directly contributed to getting it, namely the employees. The most important clue to observe this fact is the number of poor and criminals people. The two categories of people are interrelated. These people have a lower standard of living than that of primitive tribes. They feed on garbage and risk getting sick because of germs and toxic substances that pollute urban areas. They also are often addicted to psychoactive substances and risk to freeze to death in cold areas. One can see from a mile away that these people life standard is far below that of primitives. The economic standards raising false argument brought by capitalist expansion into the world primitive areas has the same value as that of the colonialists in the past centuries who grotesquely twisted Jesus moral philosophy. Such practices reveal the most odious habits of human being.

In the next article I will insist on hiding, disguising the sources of threat to modern slaves for hijacking their uprising to other targets than those responsible for organizing and maintaining the slave crime.

Gabriel Baldovin

»»  read more