Baldovin Concept censured on Facebook

(ro- for English scroll down) Baldovin Concept a fost pentru o perioada in imposibilitate de a fi publicat pe Facebook. Probabil ca unii dusmani ai sigurantei femeilor au fost deranjati de articolele scrse aici in ultimul an, si l-au raportat masiv ca spam, desi continutul sau nu contine reclame si nu vinde nimic. La rugamintile mele, dvs. cititorii ati contraraportat ca spatiu sigur care nu incalca standarderele comunitatii, pentru care va multumesc.

Eng- Baldovin Concept was for some time banned to be published on Facebook. Probably some women's security enemies were disturbed by the last year's articles I wrote here and received multiple negative spam reports to Facebook, although its content doesn’t contain advertising or any kind of commerce. But due to my asking for help, you the readers counter-reported this space as safe, not going against the Facebook Community Standards, so I thank you for that.

29 septembrie 2021

6.4. Ideological and practical solutions to avoid the disguised prostitution risks

6. Long-term solutions to stop sexual crimes and emotional abuses


6.4. Ideological and practical solutions to avoid the disguised prostitution risks


Click aici pentru varianta in limba romana

The disguise prostitute's life strategy mistakes


The LGBT community's contempt for tradition is somehow understood out of the disgrace that traditional society held on the eccentric sexual preferences ones. The feminism has backed up this community, as some of the most vehement activists are lesbians . It can be seen from a mile away that the exclusively female courtship initiation proposal violates and even excludes the preceding courtship traditional stages in favor of a single new rule. But the block rejection of the traditional pre-court rules by the new ones that favor their own lifestyle is not something accepted by all social categories.

Besides the lesbians, the disguise prostitutes also stand out. They are professionals in the sexual services commerce. They are very active on this matter because have a special interest in this new rule, in the sense that they look for wealthy men and try to seduce them in order to get as much money as possible out of it. Some do it constantly, others do it only occasionally. The passive women who occasionally practice disguised prostitution, depends on "luck". The paradox is that the most desired women are either lesbians or seductive histrionics. Well, they specifically sometimes practice the luxury prostitution.

The situations in which a woman sells her body for a large sum of money or a certain advantage are very common in the contemporary society, and at one point reached everyone's ears. These things have happened in the past, but they have been less well known. The film "Indecent Proposal" shocked 20 years ago by putting the married couple to the test. Today such a thing is practiced with no curtain, without much worry, as we can see in the social experiment below:


 

The internet is full of such married or relationship women who sell for a night out with an unknown man. The big confusion is that these women do not recognize their profession, and this even with the very social system “help”, which does not recognize it in the first place. In fact, they themselves practice it very rarely, respectively when the prospect of a big bucks hit appears on the horizon. So they would be difficult to monitor. But in general, the constant practice of luxury prostitution violates in particular the consumption code of the most countries laws, much more serious one than that on the prostitution illegality in general. The article 4 of the Directive 1998/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 on consumer protection in the indication of prices of products offered to consumers says:

“The selling price must be unambiguous, easily identifiable and clearly legible”


The “U.S. Retail Pricing Laws and Regulations 2009” has mandatory clear prices directives for every state. For example Florida legislation has at Chapter 501, CONSUMER PROTECTION

“(6) DISPLAY AND ADVERTISING OF CONSUMER COMMODITY UNIT PRICES.--A seller shall conspicuously and clearly display the price per package or unit and the unit price in close proximity to the display of the commodity in such manner as may be established by rules of the department.”


Or Hawaii:

“§486-116 Misrepresentation of price. The price of consumer commodities, when offered for sale at retail, shall be clearly displayed and shall reflect the retail price at which the public may, without special credentials or other requirements, purchase the commodities.”

Being interested in getting as much as possible profit from their services, these women hide their jobs and, of course, do not display these prices. Also, the refusal to provide these services to those with low financial potential, out of the desire to get a better offer, violates the anti-discriminatory laws allover the world. There is a right to refuse service for different reasons, but not for being poor.

The (12) article of the Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 , says:

“…any direct or indirect discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation as regards the areas covered by this Directive should be prohibited throughout the Community.”

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e and following) prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants and employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin (including membership in a Native American tribe).

Those who practice luxury prostitution through hotel lobbies, various banquets, auction rooms and business meetings are already known to organizers and chase. So, they use the entrances or these places preceding spaces, to which less wealthy men have access, and here the problems come up. These women refusal to sell their services to less wealthy men clearly violates these laws. A club may deny access to a person inside, if it conflicts with customers or has poor hygiene. These are good reasons for refusing to provide a service. But the luxury prostitutes’ refusal to provide services to less wealthy clients is illegal for this reason.

Unfortunately, all this turns against them. I wrote in detail here about the enormous risks that the disguised prostitutes expose to. The famous Jack the Ripper killed prostitutes under the diabolical attempt to satisfy his disordered sadistic libido. Many of the missing women are in fact such sadists’ victims, lured by big sums of money. Besides these dubious financial interests, they are unable to explain some customers’ violence. And not having psychopathology studies, they attribute this violence to the patriarchal-oppressive mentality towards women, especially projected from their own paranoid psychopathological background. This is a metaphorical description of the sadism inside the civilization, but it is not yet a complete description. That's why the disguised prostitutes are probably the most vehement feminist-radical activists.

The fact that they complain about this scourge, and that the system protects their executioners, is fully justified. I also mentioned in this text how the authorities perversely leave open two loopholes in support of these sadistic murderers, without taking concrete measures to prevent them. The refusal to legalize and monitor women the women who decide to practice such a profession is such a support. Another measure is their demonization in order to lately justify these sadistic actions, as an act of justice. I showed in that article that such a mentality is directly formed by socially well-positioned sadists who kill prostitutes under justification of doing the society cleansing. These strategies for justifying one's own crimes or imperialist interests have been used consistently throughout history .



It is not normal for prostitutes to be so demonized, according to traditional custom. I repeat: it is the sadists and their colleagues who protect them main fault. But, it seems to me an opposite pole exaggeration that these disguised prostitution practices should be declared honest occupations. And even less honest is to review the whole courtship mentality in the contemporary society, according to the disguised prostitutes’ illegal interests. I support the sex work legalization and monitoring so that the pricing policy is transparent. In this case the society would become more psychotherapeutic than that of the warriors, as it is now; the sadists could no longer find so many loopholes in the practice of their morbid pleasures on the prostitutes’ behalf.

We are all prey to this prejudice of traditional too harsh prostitutes’ condemnation. However, it is also your job as a woman to protect yourself from overlapping this negative image, even if this image has been abusively constructed in the past. This is the common mentality, which cannot be changed overnight. If you, as a woman, choose to waste your body of and sell it as a package, contrary to your selective sexual instinct, do not be surprised that your inner psychic conflicts are accentuated, or that you are treated like a whore by the society! It takes certain stoicism from your counterpart as a woman in the face of this mechanism, evil indeed, in which you are attracted. The feminist attempt to transform the bitch perception into a respectable woman, in the public opinion’s eyes, will not succeed. Neither the feminist theories mother will turn the prostitutes into anything other than whores, since they themselves are reduced to consumption objects.

In their discourse, many feminists complain about the "women’s objectification" *, especially as it appears in pornographic materials. Apart from the fact that the used formula is inappropriate, even if it is understood by the majority, such a women dehumanization is accepted by the contemporary feminists themselves, by accepting the prostitution itself. The theory of "is my body, not the state’s" is totally justified until it reaches "and I can do anything with it". I believe that the woman has the right to decide if she wants to terminate the pregnancy. The state must have nothing to say in this decision, and there must be no institution to manipulate it to change her mind. Eventually, the state only has to assist her psychotherapeutically, if she decides to have an abortion, or financially if she decides to give birth. But walking naked among the frustrated men, like the limousine sly dogs, is not exactly a decent thing. The influence that the naked female body has on the disadvantaged backgrounds men is not related to any norm that could change their behavior.

The notion of "objectification" also takes some counter-reactive aspect in the radical feminism rhetoric . They complain about this "objectifying" dehumanization in the context in which the money proposed by a client is about an average wage. If the money turns into thousands and hundreds of thousands, then the same thing means "respect" for them. Although they speak of the “women objectification" in any possible (non-erotic) context, they themselves turn the ideal man into a no initiative object, so they can more easily choose from the mass of material and financial uninteresting men. They have the arrogant ambition to see the world at their feet, possibly to be turned into a religious worship object (out of the sexual "object"!), just because they are attractive.

I support a decent income for anyone who does a service to contemporary society. But when the greed is too big, things can go crazy. And if we evaluate the acting value of mimicking orgasm and "falling in love" with a libidinous grandpa, I think their income claim is a bit high. This greed of someone who earns more than returns to society, through its work, will be found somewhere, somehow in the other people misery of not receiving enough for what they offer. And, the paradox is that they can fall into such a trap themselves: although they think they fool the rich and perverted grandpa, at some point they can fall prey themselves to such a sadistic murderer, who make them disappear forever. And then did they get enough for their lives?

Mistakes in the life strategy of the interest married women


I have always shown in this text why the radical feminist slogan "all men are rapists" is in fact erroneous. But I've also shown here that it's much safer for women to behave accordingly. And for this reason many behave according to it, totally justified. But beyond that, the paradoxical, ambivalent success of radical feminism among heterosexual common women is also due to couple relationship issues. And these issues generally start from the lack of concordance between the male and female libido intensity that I mentioned in subsection 4.3.

The support for the sexual intercourse initiation exclusively by the woman in a marriage relationship is totally justified. There is a natural biological discrepancy and then a cultural one between the libidinal intensity related to the two sexes, so harmonizing to the woman's rhythm is a good solution. I think many marriages in the Western world would be saved that way, and most elderly couples have even gone through such an initiation revolution, which they have happily negotiated over time. Even if there is an official marital or couple relationship, the man commits an abuse if he initiates sexual intercourse without the woman's consent. The women in this situation feel trapped in those marriages as in prison. That is why they feel even more confused about meeting a street court initiator. Because, beyond the frustration made by the unknown man courtship initiating itself , these women experience also the inner conflict between accepting the initiator courtship, or remaining in the marriage. And these couple unresolved issues make the meeting a courtship initiator frustration even bigger, even if he is discreet.

The couple problems can be solved through open dialogue, but there are some that simply have no solution. This is when husbands have evolved differently in terms of increasing or decreasing sexual appetite. For the latter case, there are compromise solutions, but in the former case, there is little chance of saving the couple, in which both partners will be satisfied. A very active libido can be partially satisfied in the way the sadists satisfy their morbid tendencies with prostitutes. In the family and community they may seem like model husbands and citizens. But from time to time they go and disfigure prostitutes. Some kill them, as I have shown here . Most people, however, practice sexual behaviors with their partner that they do not consent to, as I have shown here and noticeable in the below video


 

Sexual appetite mismatch should be a failed marriage clue for all women from the beginning of the relationship. Many women believe that such a problem will be solved in time. But in fact it will even deepen. Others do not know about it because there was no probationary period between the future spouses. In the past, the sex life came after marriage. But such a period is still not safe for a long and healthy relationship, because the two partners can lie to each other. The man may not be honest enough with communicating his sexual needs. The woman can also make a first compromise with these eccentric predispositions from the beginning, believing that she will get used to them along the way. In both cases, the relationship continuation, be it marital, is quite close to disguised prostitution , with all the risks that such a thing involve, including low self-esteem.

Unfortunately, there are quite a few women who indulge in a kind of compromise in selling their bodies for material benefits. The overly pragmatic, non sentimental-minded mentality, which ends in marriage, is the one that accentuates this kind of frustration in the long run. A very active man on the labor market, who earns very well and brings certain prosperity in the family, usually comes with a bizarre reverse of the medal. He is very likely to have a dubious sex life. The undeclared polygamy , and the implicit suffering spread among the women in his life, is "the least evil." Others have an eccentric sexuality that makes sick their wives, that has chosen her husband more with the mind than with the heart.

I have also mentioned in previous articles that the shadow rulers of the society are the first to blame for first attracting young people to these repressive areas such as the army or the police. The society is the first that does not clearly communicate to a young person about the risks of psychopathological deformity that such institutions career brings. They develop over time at least a hyper-libidinal predisposition, in addition to the natural one, towards their partner. In the worst case, they will eventually develop such morbid predispositions to eccentric sexuality, to which the partner does not consent. The couple's relationship, already affected from the first place, ends up eroding in the long run. Our society sadistically practice - how else? - programming the long-term couples destruction by attracting the boys to these deadly areas. The humanity perverse social elite lure them with attractive wages with which they buy their wives. This is the second measure of sadists’ protection, in addition to the prostitution non-legalization, which I mentioned above. The much higher wages than the economy average, given to those who work in the repressive fields, is to convince their wives to stay with them, after they abuse them in every way. Their predisposition to contempt for all that femininity means is meant to later justify their crimes.

Unfortunately, the woman also contributes to such a situation through passivity and indecision. The society is also to blame for not telling her that she will never be able to reconcile with her partner's sexual quirks. But still, because she accepts them from the very beginning, and is willing to endure them, she also agrees to this situation. She cannot decide between the material comfort brought by such a man, and the suffering she endures in bed from him. She gets caught in this material goods trap. That is why many married women in this way came close to the border with disguised prostitution. After a while she finds out that is unhappy in that marriage. Some women inability to make a firm decision about their lives is then reflected in the couple's relationship. It takes a certain dose of stoicism, endurance in the face of this higher standard of living lure, but which also comes with such increasing over time frustrations.

Compromises that some women make in choosing husband and the radical feminism predisposition


When she then meets a peaceful conversation initiator on the street, such a woman sees in him exactly the abusive husband. She explodes to insult and humiliate him, after has inhibited her frustration with her husband for a shorter or longer period, as I have shown here . I do not necessarily consider here the reaction towards an initiator who violates the courtship preceding 4th rule , namely belonging to the same social class as the approached woman. Her reaction is disproportionate because the social rule he violated has been constantly ignored by the modern society. However, although this rule has lost its consistency in the modern era, still it has not completely disappeared. But its violation can no longer be blamed on anyone, as long as the society itself does not take it very seriously.

But this kind of reaction also occurs to the same social class courtship initiator as the woman approached, and the approach is discreet, such as greeting or daily gestures to attract attention. Of course, when the approach is too explicit, the initiator violates the traditional pre-courtship stages . In this case, he causes a certain frustration to the approached woman with his direct proposal to build a couple. But an ultra-aggressive response to this approach is disproportionate. The courtship stages, as I have described them in the above linked article, are particular rules of social caste, learned in the family, through education. They are not general rules of society like the ones I've wrote about here . Therefore, these stages violation cannot even be blamed on such a courtship initiator, as long as the society did not communicate them to him in school, through education.

Such an ultra-aggressive response may come from a radical feminist like the ones I described here . Being educated in an ambivalent regime of pampering and repression , this is how they understand to "educate" other members of society, which is, through aggression. Unfortunately, such an aggressive response can also come from a married woman to such an abusive husband in intimate relationships, to which she does not directly protest. Such a reaction shows the couple's personal problems rather than a normal reaction to that man slight violation of social norms committed. She doesn't want to face her husband because, if she did, then would risk divorce and the loss of the material comfort he brings. This type of women must show verticality in facing the issue of this compromise they make in their lives. They need to discuss this issue directly with their spouses and not with society. For now, there are no tools to solve this problem, except divorce. And the woman is the only one who has to make this decision.

The society must also react cleverly to these problems, kept away by the sadists who rule from the shadows. But we see how these hidden problems suddenly erupted. Beyond the exaggerations, there are serious emotional problems that the contemporary lifestyle brings. Maybe our whole concept of marriage needs to be overhauled. In addition to physical compatibility or ideas, the partners must pay attention to their sexual appetite compatibility, but also their sexual orientation. I repeat the argument mentioned above: it is not all right for women to be fooled by a superior lifestyle through a marriage that seems lucky at first, in exchange for accepting a sexual behavior to which they do not consent. Something like that threw the prostitutes image on them, with a decrease in self-esteem. And from here come, their sympathy, even if ambivalent, for the radical feminist ideas. But there is also a need for balance from the victims’ side. If you woman decide to marry a man who works in repressive institutions (army, police, justice, civil espionage) and has a higher wage than in other fields, then you take such risks. Women themselves must test their sex life before marriage, and decide what way of life they want in it in the future. They must also choose between the marital comforts offered by such a marital abuser with all the marriage’s abuses resulting from his libido disorder.

Given that neither the married women with inferior sexual appetite, nor the prostitutes, and nor the histrionic women have satisfaction in their sexual activities, and accept them out of interests of various material gains, it is even hypocritical to complain about the minor frustration produced by such of an unknown man greeting or complimenting you in the populated public space. Of course, if this experience repeats, as in the case of famous or very beautiful women, than it can bring bigger frustration. But these are exceptional cases. In the next article I will also describe the practical and ideological repositioning solutions of lesbian women regarding the radical feminist exaggerations militancy (not all lesbians are radical feminists)

** By the phrase "women objectification" the feminists complain about the men (or just some of them) lack of empathy in love affairs. The lament about the loss of the contemporary erotic spark is justified, but it is a relentless phenomenon. The capitalism reduces everything to money, including the women. But the term "objectification" is somehow used in a street, pejorative sense, inferior to the human being state. And this is not exactly fair, if we consider that the object is the second unit of the world, in philosophy, after the atom. In the idealistic philosophies, the objectification is the spirit transposition into the matter. For example, in Hegel’s, the state is the objectification of the common good. I believe that for higher precision, and in accordance with the much older than feminism theories, the term "objectification" should be replaced by "consumption". It is not the first time in history that a popular thinking has taken terms from specialized language, and given them different meanings, after misunderstood them. The street felt the need to reduce the unity of the world concept to the term "inanimate object" and "living being," although, ontologically, the "being" and the "object" are one and the same. Is not a good choice to give a different meaning to the term "object" than the one stated in the history of science and philosophy.

Then, it should be noted that such a deformation conflicts with the psychoanalytic terminology. The sexuality itself is naturally objectifying. The satisfaction with which nature has decorated it does not come from any special "subjective" quality of the person that has sexual activity with. The fact that it is rewarded by nature with orgasm shows the sexuality "objectifying" nature. Any pleasure, whether raw (instinctual) or evolved, develops in relation to a certain object of pleasure. The orgasm is not a culmination of the moral qualities that the partners plant in each other's bodies. The literature beautifully lie to us that this would happen, but the scientific reality shows that sexual mating takes place according to common mechanical rules. Choosing from a spectrum of suitors, femininity simply chooses the alpha male. Sometimes she can consciously, assumedly, sublimate this decision in favor of the male supposed moral qualities. But in reality it is an alpha male objectification.

31 august 2021

6.3. Practical solutions for preventing histrionic psychopathological conformation and the radical feminism ideology errors

6. Long-term solutions to stop sexual crimes and emotional abuses


6.3. Practical solutions for preventing histrionic psychopathological conformation and the radical feminism ideology errors



Early Education Spoiling: A Mistake That causes the Histrionic Psychopathological Structure


The modern society main educational problems are the reverse of the traditional one. As in the latter case the education was too rigid, on the contrary, the modern society has often fallen into the error of a far too permissive education for the middle social level mentality. The first style is traumatic and leads to paranoid disorders, like any moderate trauma. The other one is too free, and leads to histrionic-like disorders; the child raised in a too permissive environment for the one in which its family developed will constantly tend to regress to an infantile stage of evolution, when faced with real world problems. If among this natural psychic mechanism of regression is added an eccentric libidinal orientation psychopathological background, genetically inherited (from parents, grandparents, great-grandparents), then the result will be a histrionic psychopathological constitution. It might manifest either as a histrionic personality, or as hysterical neurosis, with specific somatic conversion disorders.

But even without this libidinal predisposition, a too permissive education leads to the development of certain ideas that are quite similar to histrionic ones. There are below the middle society level parents who overestimate their children, thus believing that they educate them in the spirit of social success. They are those "investors" in their own children, thus putting extra pressure on them to achieve what they could not achieve. These parents work harder or give up their own satisfactions, such as vacations or various necessary products, to buy their children the things they want. Such a model of education is like a lottery. Admittedly, if the child has enough intellectual capacity to overcome social barriers, and manages to reach a higher social level, such an education would be positive. Actually, the adult educated in this way would not change his childhood lifestyle. But, if it does not have these abilities and is not selected for a successful career, then the child educated in this way can no longer adapt to his social environment.

There is no fearless man in wars and psychotherapist at the same time


Such a high expectation from the social environment can also be reflected in the couple's relationship. Too much expectation from the love’s partner could ruin the couple. The natural need for attention from the partner can sometimes take the form of a need to be listened to and understood psychotherapeutically, under this too high expectation from the other. Many women adopt a feminist-radical mentality out of the psychotherapeutic need to express themselves. They blame masculinity for the simple need to complain about the social oppression. There is an obvious justification for such a thing. I have shown here how the authorities conceal and cover up crimes against women committed by the sexual perverts or those who are in certain relationships with them. Then the human being is generally justified in complaining about society or the entourage that reflects its shortcomings. And women are in the same situation.

A friend sent me an article with such a claim of women that men should be a kind of psychotherapists for them  . Some manage to be. But others do not have such talent. They cannot be asked to do so if we take into account the typical male technological specialization. It is not right for a certain man on the street to be held responsible for the crimes against women committed by the top psychopathocratic society. So, until society comes to meet these people with psychotherapists, they themselves should limit the audience of their therapeutic discourse to the entourage, and not make them public. This is a psychotherapy rule.

Somehow, the society itself should form a category of psychotherapists rather than invest in the military system that dehumanizes individuals. And here I invite the radical feminists to become militants for the psychotherapists training to take care of the marginalized souls, rather than the warriors training that eugenically eliminate them! Such psychotherapists are not trained overnight, but through thorough training. The rest of society, or even men in general, cannot bear such a psychotherapeutic burden. Not everybody can be psychotherapist. And, therefore these accusations are perceived ad litteram. The unfounded accusations are themselves an abuse, as I mentioned in the previous article and others in this series. And we are not all sex criminals or harassers, as radical feminism constantly tends to show. Here lies the great mistake that radical feminism tends to make, which the moderate feminists are sometimes seduced by.

The heroic-weeping ambivalence


I want to see involved in anti-war mobs those feminists who support a psychotherapeutic mentality! Some of them use to join these mass movements. But not all of them do. Moreover, some of them even adopts a warrior mentality, competing with the warriors "with their weapons" to demonstrate by all means the inverted sexism, namely that the woman would be better than the man on the grounds of sexual organ, in every aspect. We notice here that, in addition to the too high ideals to which they are ideologically trapped, another big error they commit is the world’s underestimation. So, right after entering this competitive area, on the other hand, they suddenly turn into very fragile to minimal frustration such as done by the courtship peaceful initiation. It's like going into a war with the winner's motivation, but screaming for mom at the first scratch.

Yes, the competitive world, that makes the economy go around, is a sadistic one. In the future it must be ameliorated, psychotherapeutic- like. But for the time being, such a therapy cannot be made at command and with immediate effects, just because the radical feminists want to be both masculine and non-abusive. It's like asking a predator not to eat you when it's hungry, just because you entered its space peacefully. It's best to stay away from its territory. I recommend for the radical feminists a less warrior attitude, even if their war is a toy-like one.

The militant feminists that criminalize the male courtship initiation are in exactly this position. They judge by double standard two similar realities. On the one hand, they are modern women, free of prejudices, ready to compete with men in any field. And, rightly, they demand egalitarianism in terms of responsibilities and rewards for access to decision-making positions. But, on one hand, when they meet a man who ignores their feminine-seductive qualities, they categorize him as misogynistic. And, on the other hand, when they meet another one who tends to appreciate these qualities, eventually initiating the courtship, they declare him as sexually harasser, and cause a scandal in the area. This is the case of a too aggressive response to the somewhat more explicit courtship initiation by a unknown man, as we saw in this case  , as in many others.

In this case I recommend even more politeness and less (warrior) aggressive attitude. Yes, anyone can have a bad day or go through a difficult time. But the community politeness rules apply to everyone. The greeting between known or unknown persons has a friendly function well embedded in the community mentality. It appeared to communicate the peaceful intentions and good mood for others, in the classical society relationships, when people could easier than today harm each other. Today, there is no need to communicate such peaceful intentions, because crime is repressed by the competent institutions. But the greeting remained as a form of incipient politeness among acquaintances. But if it occurs towards unknown persons, it does not mean that it becomes indecency. When a discreet courtship initiator greets a woman from the unknown to her position, he has not committed any crime. Eventually he can be ignored. But to shout out loud that he committed a crime, as that feminist in the link above did, is a dangerous degeneration of the feminist mentality.

Maybe you don't feel like saying "hi!" or "hello" when you have a bad day, but it's still nice to do so. In the same way, you can nicely refuse an unknown courtship street initiator. Only if he continues courting even after the refusal, then and only then he meet the harassment criteria and the police can be called for help. Every case of oversized perceptions of the initiating courtship frustration by unknown men can be countered by the preceding rules traditional institutions. If you are so highly sensitive as to react vehemently to a peaceful approach from a stranger, with no stalking or following after refusal, then you may not as "modern" as you think of you. You need to go back to traditional regulations like wedding rings, which are very protective, as I described here   .

There are many other solutions to prevent the courtship initiation. Displaying a clear message like "Don't stress me!" is one of them. The black ring, which has become a asexual movement symbol, might be a detail that keeps men away. Moreover, a badge with the message "radical feminist" is enough for a woman to be bypassed, both on the street and in institutions. In fact, this is currently happening. But, yes, the need for a sexual harassment scandal is sometimes bigger than communicating one's own radical ideas, pretending to be accepted by the majority. The wrong militancy that radical feminists advocate can deepen social marginalization through dubious development.



The minor frustrations of this kind cannot be completely eliminated from our lives. We cannot make rules for their total elimination. I wrote in the previous chapter about Kant's pigeon paradigm. Living in the community creates some frustration itself, among the numerous benefits. There are many things that bother us and maybe this is the meaning of history itself: to solve them in the future with better technological and mentality tools. The most beautiful and desired things come also with an unpleasant side. This dream of the total frustrations elimination is a sign of the childhood histrionic spoiling that is more or less active in each of us. The mother image, who solves all our problems when we were children at our simplest scream, bring us beautiful memories. And it would be ideal for society to do the same. But the society advantages means that another person who must serve us, which is not exactly fair, because that means slavery  . When we are helpless children, it is justifiable for parents to support us in the simplest things. But when we become adults, it is not natural to wait for someone's help for the slightest problem. Let us remember, however, that not even our mothers could resolve all our problems back then! So can not do the society.

The risks that the histrionics expose to


Both the Casanova man (the pick-up artist) and the histrionic or the disguised prostitute woman skip these rules and prior stages of courtship. They spread around them the emotional suffering that I described here   and here   . But, besides their regular victims, they can end up themselves screwed up out of this game of seduction and emotional confusion. The Casanova men may encounter a histrionic woman who out seduce them, as shown in this movie:


It's just a movie, but inspired from the reality. Every ying finds its yang one day and this is what happens to all abusers. Then, the Casanova men get into emotional troubles and moments of anguish. The histrionic women increasingly build themselves in narcissism. Although they are very careful about whom they expose themselves to, the seductive histrionic women can also become the target of the too radically refused man violence. In the next article I will also describe the risks that the women who practice disguised prostitution expose to.

29 iulie 2021

6.2. Individual and group ideological solutions to strengthen the normal heterosexual couple

6. Long-term solutions to stop sexual crimes and emotional abuses


6.2. Individual and group ideological solutions to strengthen the normal heterosexual couple


This article continues the previous one

In the previous article I described the general social solutions to stop or reduce crime in society. In the next articles I will propose the individual and group solutions for women to defend themselves against sexual crimes and emotional abuses as they exist in today's society. Those who put people in a position to compromise have a major responsibility because they force the free will and consent. They are practically violating people’s freedom, which contemporary democratic society advertises with. But it is also the duty of the blackmailed one to get out of the humiliation situation and organize his/her life in a healthy, ecological way. Giving up the "American Dream", maximum profit ideology, as very profitable for the rich and very harmful for the poor or the middle class, is the key to these solutions. In this first article I will describe the ideological errors that threaten the consolidation of the normal heterosexual couple, ie that couple who do not practice eccentric sexual behaviors at all, or rarely practice them. In the following articles I will also describe those sexual minorities’ members ideological problems who make them join the radical feminism (not all sexual minorities support radical feminism). I have a different view of what radical feminism is  than it is commonly accepted.

Too high ideals and the normal heterosexual love affairs erosion


There are psychopathological impulses for criminalizing the male initiation of courtship, as I have shown here  . I said in that article that some histrionic women, lesbians or hidden prostitutes, have an emotional, libidinal or financial interest (in the according order) towards it. But, I have shown here  why a peaceful street approach, compliment or greeting, which does not meet the legal sexual harassment criteria, cannot be criminalized as sexual harassment or rape. I have also shown earlier in this text that in this case there is a natural minor or moderate frustration if the discrete sign specific to the courtship 3rd stage is violated. But this frustration is oversized as the 4th rule violation  , which is much more serious. Hence there came up the aggressiveness from some women that subscribe to the radical feminism ideology, towards such even discreet signs courtship initiators made by unknown men.

Although are minority among the feminists, they represent the radical feminism core (not all women that fits in these categories support the radical feminism) and sometimes influence the moderate ones, without such a psychopathological conditioning towards it. At this point I will describe a different psychological pattern from those described above. It can occur in the normal heterosexual libido women, ie those who do not have a psychopathological predisposition like the one described there. But they too can be infested with the "American Dream" mentality, which takes a long daydreaming form for the ideal partner, as concerning the love relationships. For this reason, the vehement aggressive reactions toward an unknown courtship initiator, specific to radical feminism also appear in women without such a psychopathological constitution as the one described above. They may end up incriminating a man for initiating courtship as sexual harassment or rape. They might fall into the long dreaming trap to a knight on a white horse, who is both fearless and understanding, warrior in war but also gentle, beautiful but also wild, rich but also innocent, etc., etc. ...



When these “American Dream” propaganda indoctrinated women are approached either discreetly or more explicitly by an unknown man in public, they are offended in their marital ideal that they think they deserve, as a handcrafter is offended when its products are undervalued. It makes them think they are superior to the pretentious men with whom they will later negotiate a possible couple's partnership. Although they have no psychopathological predisposition to support the radical feminism, this ideology is still adopted by them. Their predisposition to seek a far above their social level partner makes them support the radical feminism. They adopt it precisely because, they believe, it sexistly fits them better in this higher social level partner ideal.

For the psychopathological predisposition radical feminists to histrionism, lesbianism or disguised prostitution, this comes natural. But for those who want a normal heterosexual love relationship, this is a handicap. They do not realize that this feminist-radical rhetoric is a too harsh negotiation, and men avoid them precisely for adhering to this radical idea. This overlaps the very masculine ideal also influenced by the "American Dream" mentality of having a higher than his social status partner. It’s not hard to deduce that the result is exactly the opposite of what was expected. Both the sex crimes and the Western loneliness problems lie in the too high expectations from the potential partner. They are a barrier for both sexes getting along. Karen Straughan has very well noticed these far too high expectations that the women have from their partner in the couple. That is a personal narcissism manifestation which exists in men as well.



 

A singer like Shania Twain can get some audience and popularity for the bellow song. But taken too seriously, it leads to big problems in strengthening the couple.


 

This arrogance can be healed with the joy of age-specific moments and family stages, through the biological and mental wisdom. Many feminist activists gradually give up militancy as their heterosexual couple relationship consolidates. From this we can deduce that in their militancy is sublimated the disappointment of not having a satisfying relationship with a man. Here is such a case of a former feminist who later criticized her former philosophy, as in many other cases:

 

Of course, the man is not immune to this ideological plague. Most men dream of the far beyond their potential women, and this makes them have temporary relationships, with no long-term perspective. And this explains the some of them predisposition to violate the courtship basic rules and commit sexual crimes, as I showed in the previous article. This mentality is profitable for the new masters, but it is disastrous for the common people, whether male or female. The couples stay together for a short time, not enough to strengthen a relationship. Hence comes up the single parent phenomenon. The birth rate is constantly decreasing in most western countries where this "freedom" of manipulation through diffuse threats and wars is practiced  . The deficit is covered by the behind the curtains organizing of conflicts and disasters in neighboring with higher birth rates states, so as to bring labor migration to them  .

The argument "Not all men are rapists and abusers" is valid


There are very spoiled little girls who then can no longer adapt as grown up women to the social level specific to the family they actually come from. They are dominated by this miracle that the society or the divinity should do for them like their mother did when they were children. So, after such an overly permissive or too spoiling early education, these grown up women with conservative lifestyles and normal heterosexual orientation might openly support the feminist-radical ideas.

I showed here  that it is safer for women to behave according to the feminist-radical ideology according to which “all men are abusers or criminals”. The argument for such a thing is the risk reducing of meeting such a man who can cause mental or physical suffering. Any woman risks falling prey to an emotional or sexual abuser in any social environment today. But I think such ideas should be smartly used so as not to offend the honest men. And yes, there is such a thing. I mentioned earlier in this text that there are men with very low libido  , such as the schizoids for example. In addition to them, there are others whose libido is less intense than their partner’s. Such a thing is an objective reality, not someone’s subjective perception. But when these ideas are directly addressed to a certain man, accusingly, without sufficient evidence, it risks to turn into a reverse abuse, from woman to man. It seems unbelievable to radical feminists, but I have described here  that they too can become abusive, and bear the patrilineal inherited "toxic masculinity"  , despite the very idealized self-perception that women are angels only and men are devils only.

We see in this bellow article a rhetoric supported by some comic books despre ironizarea acestui argument valabil cum ca nu toti barbatii sunt abuzatori sau criminali  . We see here that psychopathological foundation myopia in recognizing the force of the adverse argument, specific to radical feminism, that I wrote about in detail here . The refusal to accept the clearly visible reality is explainable in the one's own sadism manifestation and justification, as I showed in the article linked above.

We notice here a double standard in judging a situation: on the one hand, the radical feminists artificially amplify the frustration produced even by the most discreet courtship initiation sign  done by a man; but, on the other hand, they also tend not to admit any frustration at all done to the one who is unfoundedly accused of sexual abuse or murder, without any evidence, just on this feminist-radical prejudice basis that all men are rapists.

Let us reject together this perverse strategy of demonizing the victims who will later be abused / conquered, as it has been used by the history big empires! Well, how can you keep your credibility as a radical feminist for fighting against the abuses in general, as long as you come up with such an argument based on certain comics imagined by someone, and magically transformed into an objective situation?! I will come with more details about the ideological and practical solutions for tempering or counteracting the histrionic psychopathological conformation in the next article .

28 iunie 2021

6.1. General solutions to stop the criminality

6. Long-term solutions to stop sexual crimes and emotional abuses


6.1. General solutions to stop the criminality


Click aici pentru varianta in limba romana

There are two solutions to solve these problems, as for any problem or someone's spiritual evolution. The first is the ecological social environment and the other is the psychotherapy. In the first case, the social system must take clearer measures to prevent sexual crimes. In the other case, the potential victims must change their mentality and perception of themselves or society according to the new, more equitable environment. The debates have largely focused so far on the first case. But the social measures that prevent the sexual crimes or emotional abuses and the Individual psychotherapy work only together, not separately; the social protection measures without psychotherapy do not solve the criminality problems from the past that moves in the descendants victims’ souls. They can prevent the future generations’ traumas or new traumas for those who have already been traumatized, although usually these people are much more cautious. But these protection measures are not enough to bring the victims back to their pre-crime status. They may bring some self-satisfaction, but personally the traumas still remain active.

And, combined with other psychopathological disorders they produce symptoms that no social protection can counterbalance. The social norms should not be changed according to one's psychopathological symptoms, whether that person is a king, an obsessive or an androphobic person, if they are a statistically minority in relation to the rest of the citizens. The neurotic phobias are mobile on the elements of psychic association; for example, the fear of children can later change into fear of thin voices. So if at some point the exclusive female courtship initiation rule would be imposed, and all men do not make any further sign for initiation, yet this would not mean the sudden androphobia disappearance. Androphobics would then feel uncomfortable with other male elements, such as skin or hair and so on. That is why the social rules should not be made according to a neurotic predisposition minority. This requires psychotherapy rather than a radical change in the courtship social norms , as proposed by a part of feminism.

The opposite is also true: an androphobic woman previously traumatized by a sex crime also needs concrete measures to protect against new possible crimes before using the benefits of psychotherapy to eliminate anxiety. Without such measures the psychotherapy would soon lead to bigger risks to suffer another trauma. The androphobic symptom is in this case a "teaching a lesson" to avoid such new trauma situations. Sex crime prevention measures can be divided into two categories, namely long-term measures and short-term measures. I said here that the solution to intra-institutional sexual harassment is setting up institutions to monitor social relations between sexes in work places. Then, I pointed here  the concrete solutions to stop rapes and sadistic crimes on women. But these are short-term solutions to domestic violence and anonymous sadism. All these problems together with too high expectations from the partner and emotional abuse have a long term solution. There are several other proposals coming from various voices in society that require, which is true, a wider public debate.


The current judicial system cannot effectively prevent sexual crimes


At the moment, the social system does not have a concrete targeted plan to stop domestic violence nor to prevent crime in general. The only tool used is to isolate or eradicate criminals after they have committed the crime. The committed action alone empowers a punishment to the one who violated the law. But returning to the previous damage moment is impossible in terms of irreversible crimes, so the justice is failing in its stated purpose. Its function, as well as that of all repressive institutions, is to issue threats against those who have not yet committed such crimes. Such a thing shows how medieval our society still is. The repressive solution applied to the major crimes prevention is even more monstrous. The preventive justice is also practiced in the United States, as in the “Minority Report” movie. The American police officers are encouraged to kill at the slightest sign of disobedience to authority, with the intention of "cleansing" the nation out of the juvenile delinquents just before they commit the crime.



Of course, it is not the problem of crime that is being considered here, but the unofficial political dissidence immediate elimination, started directly from the people, without the control of political institutions. The American police is therefore a political police painted in the rule of law colors. The American police officers are free to eliminate people who are not registered in the hierarchical system of executing orders for a reward but who use modern technology, like a car for example.

Luxury criminals make laws and decide punishments for moderate criminals


In addition to this medieval allure of justice, unable to prevent domestic violence, the social system shows its inability to prevent the psychopathological ones from unknown sadists. And here is its weak point from which starts its passivity towards the domestic violence against women. In reality there is a perverse game that the authorities play with the sadistic murderers, because they are luxury criminals and come right from their ranks, as I have shown here . Those who commit these crimes are largely part of the social system top. As the American public opinion constantly complains about criminality and it keeps increasing over time, the police receive tacit orders to abuse weapons against any suspect, even if many mistakes are made, and many innocent people, especially blacks, are killed.

In fact, these luxury criminals try to eliminate the made by the small gangsters’ competition, so to appear in the public eyes like justice defenders. They decide the society policy so they have every interest that the repressive system under their command not to find the minor criminals and continue their crimes. And this is constantly happening. That is why the social system tacitly protects these criminals because the state itself was formed from a widespread crime: one army defeated the other and conquered its territories. The J.J. Rousseau social contract is rather a retroactive fantasy to sweeten up some more this original social crime sin to which we are all part of. No one ever signed a contract with the society as it imposed its rules from positions of power. “Ignorance of the law is no excuse”. Here how this social system original-ancestral predisposition to crime has worthy descendants (!!!) in the social and sexual sadists that rule the system.

The social system falsely gives the impression that it would like to stop violence against women. In the United States and other Western countries a simple phone call from neighbors denouncing a woman's scream brings the police to the door of the house where they heard it as soon as possible. The promptness of the police response attests the readiness to punish the criminal who already has committed the crime, according to the contemporary repressive institutions model of action. But the domestic crime prevention measures are almost non-existent all over the world, with a few exceptions. In this case, the range of procedures for the women protection can be improved through concrete measures to relocate and change woman’s name so as to protect her from the ex partner revenge.

The same happens in the case of sex crimes with unknown perpetrators in which the social system is very passive although concrete solutions to prevent them do not require any socio-cultural revolution or anything  . As I mentioned in that article, reducing simple crimes against women means spilling the beans for these sex crimes great sharks. If that would happen, then they would be much more visible, and their criminal actions would be much harder to be done. The tacit permission for domestic crimes against women has the role of camouflaging these luxury criminals who practice murderous sadism. And a general measure against the sadists actually means a measure against the new slavery  after which the society still operates, namely the wage one. Bizarrely, the world economy works with these crimes, not only sexual ones, specific to the general slavery.

The current judiciary vicious circle against the sex crimes effective prevention


The today traditional judicial system cannot get out of the punishments vicious circle; the repressive traumas applied to criminals are based on a repressive-educational mentality in the criminals risk area. But these punishment threats stimulate this willingness to criminalize the risk groups rather than eradicate it. As an abusive parent who traumatizes its child by believing that is education, the crime control penitentiary model actually retroactively produces new criminals, either real or imaginary, who live the crimes on an obsessive-projective level. Like the punished child who is irresistibly attracted to repeating the mistake after the punishment, the murderer or the person at risk is induced to commit the crime and achieve a kind of social perfection perceived in the social privileges.

I bring to attention the shock experiments on rats, by Neal Elgar Miller and on monkeys by Robert A. Hinde, that I analyzed here  . These experiments clearly show that the direct applied traumas not only do not lead to the needs eradication, but even lead to their exacerbation. Each individual animal undergoing these experiments developed a bigger need for consumption but not a needs reduction. The punishments by public torture practiced from the medieval period until recently in history more filled the civilized man with mental disorders and ultrahedonistic mentality, oriented to commit crimes. To this consumption predisposition, obtained by the threatening messages emission, is added the advertising toxic influence  which creates a desire for socially inferior men for sexual crime. I will later return to this subject.

The violence cases against women break our hearts in two and fill our minds with anger. Those whose relatives or friends have suffered similar crimes want revenge. But these monsters that cause such suffering are sick themselves, as is the society that produces them, which is all of us. As long as we use oppressive institutions to persuade them more or less peacefully to fulfill our orders, we will have such sociopathic outgrowths in our communities.

Unfortunately, the women are drawn into ideological or social traps to be abused. The feminism rightly deplores the lack of police protection against the sexual crimes. But the solution cannot come from the repressive institutions because that is where the problem actually comes from. It is the society’s militarization that leads to the sexual crimes predisposition, starting from these eccentric sexual behaviors that develop those who work in very stressful traumatic environments.

The "American Dream" culture and general criminality


We observe a classical slavery evolution towards one that is much more difficult to observe and accuse. Instead of the slave directly threatened by the master, there are professional institutions that create wars that indirectly threaten the wage slave to be more productive. The modern wage slavery novelty consists in focusing the escape feeling into consumption. Advertising shamelessly serves us fat lies and none denounce it as if they had signed a diabolical pact. If the totalitarian megaphones propaganda provokes apathy, on the contrary, the obsessively broadcasted capitalist advertising provokes irascibility, self-dissatisfaction, and the eternal search for satisfaction. The advertising toxic influence on the mind is a totalitarian propaganda expressed in a joking and creative tone. All the state institutions have the intoxicating citizens’ mind purpose with this neo-slavery mentality, with dramatic consequences for the psychic disorder. We're mentally intoxicated by commercials. The contemporary man is so caught up in the mischievous neo-slavery seduction and prohibition system that she/he cannot afford to give up the profit and social position.

The economy is growing rapidly in such an ultra-competitive social system. The society evolution accelerating that this system supporters invoke is only the nice part of this neospartanism of eliminating the weak. But the "American Dream" culture, that brings fierce competition between individuals starting from school, creates a long-term psychopathological predisposition. The self-dissatisfaction Western culture works for the magnates but leaves behind an emotional desolation inside their employees with this anxiety to need for more, faster, better, etc. So the grassroots ones tend to circumvent social laws and norms into antisocial behaviors observing how this social system brings higher freedoms to those at the social pyramid top,

The "American Dream" culture role in the mental disorders explosion


The working to exhaustion neo-slavery mentality always makes us want more and we don't know how to stop. Hypersthenia has been cultivated in each of us. This makes us consume more and work harder. Efficiency is a normal thing. But when "the more" makes sense of survival, something is lost in the way. We have become the maximum efficiency slaves. The overconsumption is not psychotherapy and has already proven to become the most harmful religion. Its medal reverse is the mental disorders explosion that the industrial age continuously generates. An exclusively pragmatic, non-humanistic mentality, which glorifies working around the clock, first implies a mild to moderate mental disorder, of hypersthenic type. But, genetically combined with others, it generates the full spectrum of more severe to psychotic mental disorders. Any kind of fast economic growth leads to such psychopathological skyrocketing in the modern age. And the best example is that of the Eskimos "civilization" where the alcoholism rate among men exploded after being “saved out of poverty” by the capitalist lifestyle. And where there is aggression and a predisposition to physical violence, there is also this risk for sadistic behavior.


The stopping sexual crimes and emotional abuse solution is a fair society


Most sex crimes are due to these to high ideals with which people are indoctrinated from an early age. When it comes to love, dreaming too long of a partner far above one’s own social status can cause problems. Everyone has set too high standards of life that are also reflected in terms of life partner and I will detail this especially in the following articles. Too high standards of living described in women also exist in men as well. And this is part of the spiritual mutilation that the American Dream mentality has intoxicated the contemporary society human being. Whoever is affected later becomes these abuses socio-epidemiological transmitter, identifying with the aggressor and applying to the weak the abuses to which it was previously subjected.

This is the origin of urge to obtain higher freedoms that sometimes abuse the freedoms of others. In order to stop this toxic and false mentality of self-fulfillment through wealth ("American Dream") and no longer have these malign effects on modern wage slaves, it is necessary to cool down these natural tendencies for more. The solution to all the problems between the sexes in general is to change the "American dream" mentality. This social pyramid top toxic freedom to abuse the lower social layers must be stopped before it intoxicates lower ones. The inbreeding they practice in secret cannot be completely hidden. The human mind perceives it and the result is a paranoid ideation epidemically widespread in society.

Although it tends to be equated with Marxism as called neo-Marxism, limiting the freedoms and power of the social pyramid top is social prophylaxis. The most equitable social systems practice it with very good results, despite the retrograde or bankrupt systems image that the neoliberal mentality makes for them. But the reality is that wherever the social systems provide social assistance to citizens, the crimes and, implicitly, the sexual abuses are reduced. These abuses are originally hierarchical and subsequently take sexual form. Once these abuses are stopped, the normal couple relationships strengthen over time and respect for women increases.

The social system is put in a position to choose between a no crime decent and fair social environment but also with few people willing to execute orders, and a toxic social environment, with crime and violence against marginalized women and women, but also with people willing to take orders. The first social model leads to modest economic evolution, possibly inflation. The other social model produces maximum efficiency from modern slaves, willing to accept orders from their hierarchical superior in exchange for suspending the threat of violence. This improves the comfort for the social pyramid top, especially in terms of practicing luxury crimes appetite, including murderous sadism. Of course, the social pyramid top chooses the last model, because its members are the descendants of those who created it. They just inherit it. Now that we have the tools to discover this civilization meta-fraud, we have the opportunity to choose which side we are on.

Giving up the "American Dream" hedonistic ideology is the solution to stopping crime in the long run

Our lack of decision on one of the two social models makes us all part in this system conspiracy to protect sex offenders located on a higher social scale. Of course we can't have both at once. Then, if we are in the middle or at the base of the social pyramid, the maximum efficiency first model not only does not benefit us, but even directly disadvantages us; we are in fact the slaves pressured by these institutions. Then, the risks for our own family women to become these crimes victim are high in such a society.

The authorities and their puppeteers must stop this trivial game they are playing and take concrete measures, very easy to imagine, against sexual crimes. Unfortunately, I don’t think that something like this will happen soon. The subject is still kept away, as are the system's protégés crimes files, until these facts expire. Instead, the way was opened for the debate of this niche topic popularization of the exclusive female initiation courtship rule, which solves absolutely nothing among the sex crimes because the murderous sadists are unaffected by and can easily get around it.

The ecological social environment also means adjusting the present or the near future values ideology. We all want security in society but such a thing is far too high ideal for today's society. It is up to us, the citizens, to try to think outside the limits imposed by this subtle capitalist dictatorship towards its favorite subjects. Until then, I will further offer to women, as to the marginalized ones in general, a set of measures of defense against such a dictatorial ideological attack that infests the mind and spirit. In the next article  I will describe how the too high ideals affect love relationships.

29 mai 2021

5.9. Good parts in the radical feminism ideology

5. The Feminism as a reaction to crimes and emotional abuse against women


5.9. Good parts in the radical feminism ideology


Click aici pentru varianta in limba romana

I used the general psychoanalysis method within the limits of the private data protection rights


In the articles so far I have criticized and rejected most feminist-radical ideas (not to be mistaken with the justifiable moderate feminism ) with sociological, political, legal or psychopathological reasons. But, as I mentioned in the introduction, I did not write this text to demolish feminism but to strengthen it. I was interested in a public approach to psychoanalytic psychotherapy, with unveiling some internal psychic mechanisms of those involved in this movement but without pointing it to a specific person. So there was no individual's right to privacy violation. Apart from some individual public examples already famous in the social media, to which I made some psychoanalytic incursion, I did not make public any individual, unknown cases, which would cause frustration to those involved. Due to the celebrity, those cases targeted by my analysis have meanwhile developed a certain emotional shell about the negative opinions that have been circulating about them from various users of online social media. So it is very likely that my alleged "wild psychoanalysis" that targeted them will not even reach them. In fact, my psychoanalysis had another destination: it was meant to get to those anonymous people who identify with these cases, whose emotional intimacy is fully protected. In the same way, the general psychoanalysis made to the various groups that constitute the general feminism or the radical one in particular is an individual guide for the women involved to find themselves in my descriptions and to self-analyze towards a personal psychotherapeutic evolution.

The radical feminism psychopathology does not equate with the scientific error


I didn’t mean with this text to point out that the feminist-radical ideation towards psychopathological predisposition would be something incriminating, as the classic mentality does. I made this feminist-radical ideas psychopathological analysis because in this way we can better understand its supporting perseverance despite some solid counter-arguments, such as those expressed here and here   . Existenta acestui acompaniament psihopatologist nu infirma calitatea logica sau stiintifica a ideilor pe care le genereaza, desi le influenteaza. This psychopathologist supervision does not negate the logical or scientific ideas quality it generates, although it influences them. Exactly this phenomenon made me detach these influences and describe them in detail as in this chapter or in this article   and this one   . There is no absolute truth and absolute error; imprisonment in certain ideas, without the ideological evolution natural fluidity, without response to counter-arguments, shows a negative psychopathological influence on one's mentality. Its description can mean a drainage channel and retroactive communication of this ideological mass with the outside.

Such a psychopathological background also exists among anti-feminists, the general feminism ideological opponents. Many of them are the humanity itself biggest enemies. They are the murderous sadists who do not want women to be given more rights so to have an easier way to perpetuate their morbid vice. So I also described the antifeminism psychopathology, as sharp as Michel Foucault described the classical society’s tortures, not so much in this text, but especially in the other texts I have written and will continue to write. Its symptomatology is so vast and diverse that it does not occur in this text. Compared to the sadistic antifeminism psychopathology, the radical feminism described here seems harmless. Therefore, there nobody can blame me that I would have used psychopathology as a tool for building an ad hominem sophistry against feminism.

I exclude Karen Straughan and her followers from this debate as they make a moderate antifeminism, generally based on arguments. But, despite a seemingly cold analysis, there is also a psychopathological background that paradoxically risks becoming misogyny and does not recognize any merit from the feminism. Being a person and not a current, it is not deontological to look through its biography for psychopathological data and to describe them here. There are personal things that I did not expose as well when I described the radical feminism psychopathology. I only described these classes of people (in general) and not the first and last name individuals. I think that the counter-arguments power is enough to counteract this idea that she supports.

The inopportuneness or the logical or scientific falsity of some feminist ideas does not in any way mean its abolition, not even in its radical version. I do not support the classical mentality of absolutely true ideas, which would come from God, while the false ones would come from the devil or from human imperfection. Misconceptions are an important part of the very science history itself, being a generative part of the truth. And this is exactly the role of this chapter last article, namely to show the radical feminism good parts as well. As mentioned in the introduction, the error has a clearly recognized role for epistemology in the scientific truth genesis. It is a stage of truth. Well, according to this principle, in addition to the opposition I had in this text to the radical-feminist ideas, now is the time to show its the good parts.



Ideas directly inspired from the radical feminism rhetoric


The fact that I ended up doing this study is largely due to certain radical feminists. I hope that the society will overcome the prejudices inherited or taken over from the social customs, as I did, and take action against these globally planned crimes. That's what happened to me. The premise of combating the radical feminists excesses led me to deeper theoretical analyzes than I had previously done on one subject or another. In some cases, they led me to more precise principles that I had previously adhered to. This is the case with the clearer expression of the social norms preceding the court that I have theorized here   and here   . In other cases, trying to infirm them and looking for objective data, I radically changed my position and adopted their ideas. This was the case with the analysis the risk of rape and sexual violence from the sadists on the middle-class and lower-class women.

Then, despite its many mistakes, the feminism radical wing is still primarily beneficial for women themselves. The accusatory expressed feminist-radical ideas, such as "all men are rapists," are offensive to those of us who have not raped anyone. But still, applied in their behavior, these ideas make them much more cautious and less likely to fall victims. I have constantly criticized in this text the support for the radical-feminist ideas such as "all men are rapists". Pointing these ideas accusatively randomly towards one man or another, in the absence of solid evidence, is an abuse. However, I support and recommend all women to quietly adopt these ideas on a behavioral, discreet level, without baseless accusations. Many of them do, which is good for their safety. The women are in danger and the authorities are trying to disguise it. The today media controlled by sick and perverse elite contributes to a much too artificial good image to a certain part of society, which is actually the origin of these horrors. For this reason, despite its errors I have described in this text so far, radical the feminism is beneficial because it draws attention to this pact that the social system makes with criminals.

On how the radical feminism inspired me to describe the moderate and the murderous sadism


After trying to reject these radical feminism cautious prejudices, I came to support some of them. I discovered the conspiracy that the system supports to hide the serial killers extreme sadism that later I wrote about here   . This conspiracy blinds us all. Although the serial killers reality, such as Jack the Ripper, has been known since the 19th century, the world wide authorities keep fooling us to forget about this psychopathological scourge specific to the wild capitalism and, more recently, to the neoliberalism. The most used and well-known psychopathology treaty, namely "The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (DSM) or the "International Statistical Classification of Diseases" (ICD) say absolutely nothing about these upper-class sadism monstrous morbid manifestations that ends up in breaking news cases. In the United States alone, between 400,000 and 600,000 people, mostly women, disappear each year according to the FBI itself. We are not talking here about the 3-rd world countries semi-dictatorial systems, but about those with important "democratic tradition". These women are not kidnapped and killed for robbery, as is the case with men. These women are kidnapped by the extreme sadists who monstrously kill them in sexual acts that even the most radical feminists can not describe. Those sadists are part of the repressive institutions and know how to erase their traces in order not to get to the newspapers front pages. And yet some of them come to the surface from time to time.

A journalist has to do a real investigative job to find these official credible statistics. There are several web-sites like this   , in which such statistics are published, but no official source is cited. It’s impossible to tell whether there is indeed an official source and the statistics are not falsified, or whether that source is an official one.

Obvious sexism in the psychopathological descriptions of the main mental disorders classification models


I have been studying psychopathology for 20 years and during this time I couldn’t make a simple connection between the moderate sadism described by these treatises and these monstrous crimes that explode in the mass-media every few decades. The psychopathologists who edit these treatises obediently follow orders from the society masters. I made this simple connection only after I confronted the radical feminists’ ideas under the first impulse to reject through these statistics. It was me who was coming with a carefully modeled by the official media lies prejudice on the alleged excessive rape fear subject; but actually the statistics showed me that the women are not afraid enough about it and the authorities indeed hide this dramatic reality.

Besides paying attention to the serial killers protection conspiracy, the radical feminism has led me to note that psychopathology does not treat the emotional abuse done by the histrionic men in the same way as the histrionic women’s. The traditional psychopathology did not take into account the Casanova-type seducers emotional abuses for which I made a summary here . I knew about the seductive hysteroid women’s emotional abuse on men that the psychopathologists have exposed in detail over time. I also knew about the emotional abuse caused by the hysteroid male on women but they are not described as important and in the same level of detail in these treatises. I have read about these abuses in the several tens of pages long descriptions, in those very voluminous psychopathology treatises. But I do not remember finding a detailed macho Casnaova description in the synthetic psychopathology treatises that I have studied, in which this behavior was recognized as psychopathological and abusive. In the traditional culture, this is recognized as high standard male behavior norm. The traditional psychopathology did not show its abuse appearance but evaluated it as men normal behavior. These behaviors were given the appearance of “others” and were not kept when the symptoms were summarized.

For example, DSM 5 treats in a very sexist manner the “Histrionic Personality Disorder” (code 301.50). The diagnostic criterion number 2 is:

„(2) ) Interaction with others is often characterized by inappropriate sexually seductive or provocative behavior”

We find in this criterion the seductive behavior of the histrionic woman but not that of the histrionic man. Casanova also dresses sexy like the histrionic seductress but he is not constantly provocative so as not to be confused with the homosexuals, whom he generally delimits himself from. Besides, any kind of male sexual exhibitionism of his only culturally hidden anatomical part brings the perception of being a rapist, which he constantly avoids. He can be more or less exhibitionist like a histrionic woman at the pool, at nudists or other places like this. He can also become a bit more exhibitionist exclusively in the presence of women. But a male body worked at the gym is not as sexually challenging as the histrionic women. His exhibitionism is more about possession, namely cars, clothes, luxury watches and other expensive clothing accessories, usually rented. But the DSM does not say in any of its editions about this male exhibitionism in a certain criterion, nor in the more detailed description that follows. All the DSM editions have similar criteria for this disorder. This fact is also found in criterion number 4:

„(4) Consistently uses physical appearance to draw attention to self”

Also, these criteria have more detailed description like this one:

„They may embarrass friends and acquaintances by an excessive public display of emotions (e.g., embracing casual acquaintances with excessive ardor, sobbing uncontrollably on minor sentimental occasions, having temper tantrums) ”

We can see in this criterion rather the histrionic woman description. The histrionic man rarely bursts into tears. Also, at criterion number 8 there is again a specific feminine form:

„(8) Considers relationships to be more intimate than they actually are.”

Indeed, both the histrionic man and woman make close friends with people on a higher level of the social ladder. But the histrionic man is rather arrogant than close to those around him, contrary to the histrionic woman. In the more detailed description of these criteria you can read:

„ Individuals with this disorder often consider relationships more intimate than they actually are, describing almost every acquaintance as “my dear, dear friend” ...”.

Somehow, the traditional psychopathology even tends to praise his macho behavior, which shows a traditional androcratic, abusive, conquering mentality, which thus justifies its own mentality and its own privileges, exactly as the most radical feminism claims. When analyzing Casanova's adventures , the traditional psychopathology ironically reveals the seducing women failures rather than criticizing his predisposition to emotionally abuse them through the seduction and then sudden abandonment. We ca see here that the feminist theory of men entitlement through education or the discrimination culture is fully covered in the way that the psychopathologists have reflected the histrionic behavior abuses. Although the consumerist culture promotes this image, in reality there are very few women who appreciate the Casanova man with his endless attempts to have intimate relationships with as many women as possible. Well, the complaints of both radical and moderate feminism must change this popularized perception build by the neo-slavery mentality intention to make men work more so to have more women. So the description I did later was simply a reminder of those voluminous treatises broad descriptions found in the radical feminism accusations. I believe that the description I made of the hysteroid man should be adopted by the summary descriptions psychopathology treatises such as DSM or ICD. So in this case their generally unfounded accusations also have a beneficial part.

The antifeminism: a social privileged ones strategy to undermine the feminist movement


The main purpose of perpetuating the classical slavery, today modified into a false free trade relationship   , is exactly what the most radical feminism describes. It pointed out that there is a media education into the disguised prostitution culture supported by the social privileged ones. And indeed, those who run the society not only do not take efficient actions to stop these crimes causes but perversely encourage and promote them, just as the radical feminists say. Through this prostitution culture promoted among the common mentality, the socially privileged ones want to put into practice in the future their sadistic impulses (including murderous), and get away with it. At the top of the social pyramid, the sexual harassment is practiced at an imperceptible level, where even the most radical feminists fail to see it. Then, such a mentality paves the way for fleeting relationships with married or unmarried women for the social top pyramid businessmen. Hence, the feminism critique (including the radical one) is fully justified when applied globally and not individually to a particular man.

The social pyramid top does not want to give up these abusive privileges. Based on certain errors, especially at the political level, the Marxism and feminism are generally recognized as harmful by these sadistic interests’ mentalities. In the same way the sophists had their excesses, as how the Marxism had. But the sophists were authentic visionaries   even if the history of philosophy and science ignored their decisive contribution. In the same way, the social exploitation theory with which Marxism was identified remains valid during the new type of slavery practiced by the neo-liberalist society, even if it is also taken over from the ancient sophists. The block rejection of sophist, Marxist and feminist theories, without detailed analysis of their proposals, is explained precisely by the interest of the socially privileged ones not to lose their abusers advantages over the rest of society.

So, for leading me to these clues, I think that the radical feminism is also doing a good job, although we are still opponents of the issues outlined above. For the friendship I have with some of them, I am willing to support in the short term some radical ideas including those I criticized here on a purely theoretical level. The purpose of such a thing is exclusively to draw attention to the inequitable society in which we live today, which is a danger to women. But, I repeat, I do not support these long-term solutions proposed by them because of the arguments I have already set out in this study and others that I will set out later in the next chapter. Many might as well become aware of the problems and risks to which women are exposed. From this point of view, I am also a radical feminism excesses supporter. However, I do not know if it is more beneficial to even involuntarily draw his attention to the crimes tolerated by the sadistic social system on women or is rather negative the rejection reaction towards the moderate feminism wrongly mistaken with the radical one excesses. But that's another topic of debate. This was the chapter on feminism. In the following one I will describe the long-term solutions to stop the general criminality and that against women in particular . 

Popular Posts

Labels